|
|
Administrative Tribunal (TRIBAD)
Administrative Tribunal (TRIBAD)
  •  

Documents

Advanced search

SearchClear

This Search uses AND operators, it only returns documents with ALL the keywords you entered/selected.

Hernán Frías Morán v. Director General of the Inter-American Institute of Agricultural Sciences Judgment ,2139,2168,2177,2193,2204,2209,2224,2228,2238,2259,2266,2305,2314,2336,2362,2364,2373,2392,244

Document Code (Number)31
Category:Judgment
Year:1977
Language:English
Keywords: Competence, Formal requirements, Interpretation, Breach, Complaint allowed in part, Costs, Damages, Discretion, Executive Head, General principles, Termination, Internal Appeal Body, Lack of evidence, Post description, Nullity, Contract, Non-renewal, Report, Salary, Disciplinary measure, Internal appeal, Permanent, Procedure, Due process, Equity, IICA - Staff Administration Manual, Two-year review (IICA)
Documents to download:

Antonio Planells v. Secretary General of the Organization of American States

Document Code (Number)27
Category:Judgment
Year:1976
Language:English
Keywords: Interpretation, Complaint allowed in part, Costs, Termination, Lack of evidence, Reinstatement, Annual leave, Contract, Conversion, Law of contract, Non-renewal, Permanent appointment, Fixed term, Permanent, Staff Rules - rule 104.5 (b)(ii) (1976), Staff Rules - rule 105.9 (d)(iv) (1975), Vague claim
Documents to download:

Juan F. Bauta v. Secretary General of the Organization of American States

Document Code (Number)25
Category:Judgment
Year:1976
Language:English
Keywords: Competence, Exception, Formal requirements, Application, Interpretation, Quashing, Age limit, Breach, Cause of action, Contributory service, Discretion, Executive Head, General principles, Injury, Notification, Procedural flaw, Receivability, Retirement and Pension Plan, Appraisal of evidence, Burden of proof, Internal Appeal Body, Internal remedies exhausted, International civil service principles, Lack of evidence, Lack of injury, Patere legem, Amendment, Class action, Pension, Analogy, Nullity, Candidate, Formal flaw, Competition, Equality of conditions, Priority, Qualifications, Vacancy, International civil servant, Intervention, Limits, Selection Board, New claim, Permanent, Probation, Procedure, Due process, Effective date, Executive Order No. 75-9, Flaw, Locus standi, Medical examination, New plea, non-retroactivity, Provision, Staff Rules - rule 104.3 (b) (1975), Suspensive action
Documents to download:

Luis F. Ramírez Velarde v. Retirement and Pension Committee of the General Secretariat of the Organization of American States

Document Code (Number)22
Category:Judgment
Year:1976
Language:English
Keywords: Exception, Interpretation, Age limit, Compulsory retirement, Contributory service, Discretion, Extension of services, Notification, Organization's interests, Retirement, Retirement and Pension Committee, Retirement and Pension Plan - section VI, Lack of injury, Language of rule, Fitness, Staff Rules - rule 110.3 (c) (1971)
Documents to download:

Isabel Chaly Caserta v. Secretary General of the Organization of American States

Document Code (Number)14
Category:Judgment
Year:1975
Language:English
Keywords: Competence, Interpretation, Cause of action, Charter of the OAS - article 119, Complaint allowed in part, Damages, Discretion, Executive Head, Notification, Receivability, Advisory body, Advisory opinion, Appraisal of evidence, Burden of proof, Evidence, Internal Appeal Body, International civil service principles, Lack of evidence, Recommendation, Rules of Procedure - article 22.1 (1972), Candidate, Decision-maker, Internal candidate, Competition, Equality of conditions, General Standards - article 17 (1973), General Standards - article 17 (b) (1973), General Standards - article 38 (1973), Priority, Qualifications, Vacancy, Grounds, Charter of the OAS - article 121, Charter of the OAS - article 126, General Standards - article 11 (b) (1973), General Standards - article 35 (1973), Geographical distribution, International civil servant, Intervention, Limits, Negligence, Promotion, Selection Board, Staff Rules - rule 104.1 (1971), Staff Rules - rule 104.1 (b) (1971), Staff Rules - rule 104.11 (b) (1971), Statute - article VII
Documents to download:

Alberto Vesprémy Bangha v. Secretary General and Retirement and Pension Committee of the General Secretariat of the Organization of American States

Document Code (Number)12
Category:Judgment
Year:1975
Language:English
Keywords: Decision, Competence, Exception, Interpretation, Offer, Age limit, Breach, Cause of action, Complaint allowed, Compulsory retirement, Contributory service, Damages, Executive Head, Extension of services, Medical fitness, Notification, Organization's interests, Receivability, Retirement, Retirement and Pension Committee, Retirement and Pension Plan - section VI, Staff Rules - rule 109.3 (h) (1971), Staff Rules - rule 109.4 (a) (1971), Termination, Appraisal of evidence, Lack of injury, Organization's duties, Patere legem, Terms of appointment, Acquired right, Legitimate expectation, Recommendation, Staff Rules - rule 109.3 (1971), Mistake, Staff Rules - rule 109.3 (e) (1971), Contract, Acceptance, Duty to substantiate decision, Fitness, Grounds, ILO Administrative Tribunal - Judg. 61 (1962), Report
Documents to download:

Carlos J. Mendoza v. Secretary General of the Organization of American States

Document Code (Number)9
Category:Judgment
Year:1974
Language:English
Keywords: Post classification, Competence, Abolition of post, Interpretation, Reassingment, Definition, Discretion, Equal treatment, General principles, Injury, Organization's interests, Appraisal of evidence, Evidence, International civil service principles, Lack of evidence, Lack of injury, Staff reduction, Amendment, Acquired right, Rules of Procedure - article 14.1 (1972), Post description, Testimony, Law of contract, Balance of contractual obligations, Competition, Disclosure of evidence, Equality of conditions, General Standards - article 17 (1973), General Standards - article 17 (b) (1973), General Standards - article 38 (1973), General Standards - article 51 (b) (1973), Priority, Qualifications, Reorganization, Repeal, Security of tenure, Seniority, Staff Rules - rule 109.5 (b)(iii) (1971), Staff Rules - rule 109.5 (j) (1971), Vacancy, Working relations
Documents to download:

Isabel L. Victory v. Secretary General and Retirement and Pension Committee of the General Secretariat of the Organization of American States

Document Code (Number)7
Category:Judgment
Year:1974
Language:English
Keywords: Decision, Formal requirements, Interpretation, Age limit, Cause of action, Complaint allowed, Complaint allowed in part, Compulsory retirement, Contributory service, Costs, Damages, Executive Head, Extension of services, Medical fitness, Procedural flaw, Receivability, Retirement, Retirement and Pension Committee, Retirement and Pension Plan, Retirement and Pension Plan - section VI, Staff Rules - rule 109.3 (h) (1971), Internal remedies exhausted, Organization's duties, Time bar, Language of rule, Recommendation, Retirement and Pension Plan - section I, Statute - article VI.1 (a), Correction of complaint, Liability, Liquidation of benefits, Nullity, Omission
Documents to download:

Rodolfo T. García, Helena de Méndez, Lucila Prieto de Zambrana, Beatriz de Mendoza and Modesto Lucero v. Secretary General of the Organization of American States

Document Code (Number)6
Category:Judgment
Year:1974
Language:English
Keywords: Post classification, Application, Interpretation, Quashing, Cause of action, Complaint allowed, Definition, Advisory body, Advisory opinion, Appraisal of evidence, Burden of proof, Evidence, Internal Appeal Body, Lack of evidence, Classification standards, Expert inquiry, Joinder, Post description, Previous question, Staff Rules - rule 102.2 (d) (1971), Staff Rules - rule 102.3 (1976), Staff Rules - rule 102.3 (b) (1971), Testimony
Documents to download:

Sixto Alfredo Aquino Padrón v. Secretary General and Chairman of the Retirement and Pension Committee of the General Secretariat of the Organization of American States

Document Code (Number)11
Category:Judgment
Year:1974
Language:English
Keywords: Decision, Competence, Exception, Interpretation, Age limit, Charter of the OAS - article 119, Complaint allowed in part, Compulsory retirement, Contributory service, Executive Head, Extension of services, Notification, Organization's interests, Policies and Procedures, Receivability, Retirement, Retirement and Pension Committee, Retirement and Pension Plan - section VI, Staff Rules - rule 109.3 (h) (1971), Staff Rules - rule 109.4 (a) (1971), Termination, Internal remedies exhausted, Acquired right, Legitimate expectation, Retirement and Pension Plan - section I, Staff Rules - rule 109.3 (1971), Statute - article VI.1 (a), General Standards - article 11 (1973), Mistake, Staff Rules - rule 109.3 (e) (1971)
Documents to download:
1234