|
|
Administrative Tribunal (TRIBAD)
Administrative Tribunal (TRIBAD)
  •  

Documents

Advanced search

SearchClear

This Search uses AND operators, it only returns documents with ALL the keywords you entered/selected.

Enrique Méndez v. Secretary General of the Organization of American States

Document Code (Number)55
Category:Judgment
Year:1980
Language:English
Keywords: Decision, Formal requirements, Abolition of post, Offer, Quashing, Reassingment, Breach, Executive Head, Procedural flaw, Termination, Advisory body, Advisory opinion, Evidence, Lack of evidence, Reinstatement, Staff reduction, Recommendation, Contract, Equality of conditions, Priority, Qualifications, Seniority, Vacancy, Statute - article VII.2, Flaw, Grade, Post, Duty to comply, Reconstruction of career, Reduction in force, Staff Rules - rule 110.4 (b)(i), Staff Rules - rule 110.6, Staff Rules - rule 110.6 (i)(i), Staff Rules - rule 110.6 (i)(ii)
Documents to download:

Alvaro Galván v. Secretary General of the Organization of American States

Document Code (Number)46
Category:Judgment
Year:1979
Language:English
Keywords: Decision, Post classification, Abolition of post, Application, Quashing, Reassingment, Breach, Discretion, Executive Head, Practice, Advisory opinion, Appraisal of evidence, Burden of proof, Evidence, Internal Appeal Body, Internal remedies exhausted, Lack of evidence, Reinstatement, Terms of appointment, Legitimate expectation, Recommendation, Expert inquiry, Post description, Reorganization, Report, Negligence, Promotion, Internal appeal, Creation of post, Non-existing post, Grade, Staff member's duties, Assignment, Expert, Internal remedies, Post, Post held by complainant, Staff member, Title of post
Documents to download:

Frank Hebblethwaite, Thomas J. Stone, Carmen Castro, Teresa Findlay, Diana Martínez, and Marvin Broadbent v. Secretary General of the Organization of American States Judgment ,2077,2083,2110,2121,213

Document Code (Number)30
Category:Judgment
Year:1977
Language:English
Keywords: Decision, Competence, Abolition of post, Quashing, Reassingment, Breach, Complaint allowed in part, Definition, General principles, Injury, Notification, Termination, Appraisal of evidence, Evidence, International civil service principles, Reinstatement, Staff reduction, Amendment, Domestic law, Terms of appointment, Post description, Testimony, Contract, Law of contract, Balance of contractual obligations, General Standards - article 17 (b) (1973), Priority, Security of tenure, Seniority, Acceptance, ILO Administrative Tribunal - Judg. 61 (1962), International civil servant, Permanent, Transfer, Flaw, non-retroactivity, Suspensive action, Staff Rules - rule 110.6 (1975), General Assembly - AG/RES.249 (VI-O/76), Budgetary reasons, General Assembly - AG/RES.258 (VI-O/76), General Standards - article 16 (a) (1976), Non-existing post, Staff Rules - rule 105.2 (a) (1975), Staff Rules - rule 105.2 (b) (1975), Statute - article II
Documents to download:

Paul J. Chrétien v. Secretary General of the Organization of American States

Document Code (Number)29
Category:Judgment
Year:1977
Language:English
Keywords: Abolition of post, Reassingment, Complaint allowed in part, Damages, Discretion, Executive Head, Injury, Procedural flaw, International civil service principles, Patere legem, Reinstatement, Staff reduction, Omission, Reorganization, International civil servant, Limits, Statute - article VII.2, Procedure, Staff Rules - rule 110.6 (1975), Executive Order No. 76-2, General Assembly - AG/RES.249 (VI-O/76), General Standards - article 11 (1976), General Standards - article 12 (1976)
Documents to download:

Ralph E. Getz v. Secretary General of the Organization of American States

Document Code (Number)26
Category:Judgment
Year:1976
Language:English
Keywords: Competence, Reassingment, Complaint allowed in part, Executive Head, Termination, Reinstatement, Staff reduction, Vacancy, Staff Rules - rule 105.2 (1975), Transfer, Staff Rules - rule 110.6 (1975)
Documents to download:

Carlos J. Mendoza v. Secretary General of the Organization of American States

Document Code (Number)9
Category:Judgment
Year:1974
Language:English
Keywords: Post classification, Competence, Abolition of post, Interpretation, Reassingment, Definition, Discretion, Equal treatment, General principles, Injury, Organization's interests, Appraisal of evidence, Evidence, International civil service principles, Lack of evidence, Lack of injury, Staff reduction, Amendment, Acquired right, Rules of Procedure - article 14.1 (1972), Post description, Testimony, Law of contract, Balance of contractual obligations, Competition, Disclosure of evidence, Equality of conditions, General Standards - article 17 (1973), General Standards - article 17 (b) (1973), General Standards - article 38 (1973), General Standards - article 51 (b) (1973), Priority, Qualifications, Reorganization, Repeal, Security of tenure, Seniority, Staff Rules - rule 109.5 (b)(iii) (1971), Staff Rules - rule 109.5 (j) (1971), Vacancy, Working relations
Documents to download:

Herbert N. Krebs G. v. Secretary General of the Organization of American States

Document Code (Number)3
Category:Judgment
Year:1973
Language:English
Keywords: Competence, Offer, Reassingment, Staff Rules - rule 109.5 (h) (1971), Breach, Cause of action, Charter of the OAS - article 119, Complaint allowed, Damages, Discretion, Executive Head, General principles, Injury, Procedural flaw, Termination, Advisory body, Advisory opinion, Appraisal of evidence, Burden of proof, Evidence, Internal Appeal Body, Internal remedies exhausted, International civil service principles, Lack of evidence, Lack of injury, Moral injury, Organization's duties, Patere legem, Protective principle, Reinstatement, Staff reduction
Documents to download:

Jorge Almada Morrison v. Secretary General of the Organization of American States

Document Code (Number)1
Category:Judgment
Year:1972
Language:English
Keywords: Competence, Abolition of post, Application, General Assembly - AG/RES.35 (I-O/71), Interpretation, Offer, Permanent Council - CP/doc.126/71, rev.1, Quashing, Reassingment, Staff Rules - rule 109.5 (h) (1971), Staff Rules - rule 109.5 (i) (1971), Statute - article II.4, Statute - article II.6, Successive contracts
Documents to download:
12