Each year the OAS Secretary General publishes a proposed Program-Budget for the coming calendar year. The OAS General Assembly meets in a Special Session to approve the Program-Budget. Find these documents from 1998-2013 here.
Each year in April, the OAS Board of External Auditors publishes a report covering the previous calendar year’s financial results. Reports covering 1996-2016 may be found here.
Approximately six weeks after the end of each semester, the OAS publishes a Semiannual Management and Performance Report, which since 2013 includes reporting on programmatic results. The full texts may be found here.
Here you will find data on the Human Resources of the OAS, including its organizational structure, each organizational unit’s staffing, vacant posts, and performance contracts.
The OAS executes a variety of projects funded by donors. Evaluation reports are commissioned by donors. Reports of these evaluations may be found here.
The Inspector General provides the Secretary General with reports on the audits, investigations, and inspections conducted. These reports are made available to the Permanent Council. More information may be found here.
The OAS has discussed for several years the real estate issue, the funding required for maintenance and repairs, as well as the deferred maintenance of its historic buildings. The General Secretariat has provided a series of options for funding it. The most recent document, reflecting the current status of the Strategy, is CP/CAAP-3211/13 rev. 4.
Here you will find information related to the GS/OAS Procurement Operations, including a list of procurement notices for formal bids, links to the performance contract and travel control measure reports, the applicable procurement rules and regulations, and the training and qualifications of its staff.
The OAS Treasurer certifies the financial statements of all funds managed or administered by the GS/OAS. Here you will find the latest general purpose financial reports for the main OAS funds, as well as OAS Quarterly Financial Reports (QFRs).
Every year the GS/OAS publishes the annual operating plans for all areas of the Organization, used to aid in the formulation of the annual budget and as a way to provide follow-up on institutional mandates.
Here you will find information related to the OAS Strategic Plan 2016-2020, including its design, preparation and approval.
The OAS-CARICOM Joint Electoral Observation Mission (JEOM) calls on the National Bureau for Electoral Complaints and Challenges (BCEN) to carry out their responsibilities with integrity and impartiality
April 14, 2011
The efforts to improve the second round of the presidential and legislative elections affect not only the organization of Election Day and the tabulation of votes but also the complaints and challenge phase of the electoral process. Accordingly, two documents containing recommendations to improve the procedural aspects of the complaints and challenge phase have been considered by the Provisional Electoral Commission (CEP). The first document is entitled “Application of the innovative procedure for the complaints and challenges related to the results of the second round of the elections of 20 March 2011”, and the second, “Applicable procedure for the electoral complaints and challenges bureaux”. These two documents were posted on the CEP web site on 2 April 2011 and were the basis for the training on 28 March 2011 of the Presidents of the Department Electoral Bureaux (BEDs) and later the CEP Commissioners.
The essential objective of this innovative procedure is to establish the formal conditions that should be observed in receiving the submissions addressed to the complaints and challenges bureaux, to describe briefly the handling of the dispute during the public sessions, and to explain how the validity of the challenge submitted by the complainant is determined. The intent of these procedural rules is to guarantee a minimum of procedural impartiality and, as a consequence, to confer greater legitimacy to those elected and to the overall electoral process.
Notwithstanding the above, taking into account the number of decisions taken to refer matters to the National Bureau for Electoral Complaints and Challenges (BCEN), it would appear that a large proportion of the Departmental Bureaux for Electoral Complaints and Challenges (BCEDs) acted as registration offices for the requests submitted instead of seeking to establish the veracity of the allegations made by the complainant and taking a decision which could be overturned by the higher instance.
The Mission calls on the members of the National Bureau for Electoral Complaints and Challenges (BCEN) to carry out the disputes process with integrity and transparency in order to guarantee procedural fairness. To attain these objectives it would be useful to implement a lottery draw to determine the selection of judges for the two electoral tribunals. In like manner, the verification of the results-sheets questioned by the complainant would help increase the credibility and legitimacy of the process while at the same time guaranteeing the neutrality and fairness of those involved. The quality of the decisions taken by the BCEN would in this way validate the efforts undertaken to improve the organization of the second round of the presidential and legislative elections and the tabulation of the votes.
For more information, please visit the OAS Website at www.oas.org.