On November 28, 2024, the IACHR identified that the risk persists with respect to four persons who were beneficiaries of precautionary measures through Resolution 8/2015, Resolution 7/2019, and Resolution 64/2019. It also decided to protect 14 additional persons who are members of the same organization. The IACHR regretted the lack of information and implementation of protection measures by the State, which reportedly places the beneficiaries in a situation of lack of protection in the context of the country.
Upon analyzing the available information, the Commission decided:
The Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR) adopted on November 25, 2024 the Follow-up and Modification Resolution 89/2024 in relation to the situation of María Corina Machado Parisca in Venezuela (PM-125-19). The IACHR considered that the risk that has been observed since the granting of the PM against the beneficiary continues, and has increased in the post-electoral period of the 2024 presidential election, without the State having adopted protection measures in her favor. After analyzing the allegations of fact and law, in the terms of Article 25 of its Rules of Procedure, the Commission concluded that the situation of Mrs. María Corina Machado Parisca persists, and decided as follows:
a) Continue to monitor the situation of María Corina Machado Parisca in Venezuela;
b) Not to extend the precautionary measures in relation to the requested persons;
c) Modify the scope of these precautionary measures and to require that the State:
i. adopt the necessary measures to protect the rights to life and personal integrity of Ms. María Corina Machado Parisca;
ii. implement the necessary measures to guarantee that the beneficiary can continue to carry out her political participation activities without being subjected to threats, harassment, or acts of violence in the exercise thereof; In particular, to formally inform the beneficiary about the existence of any investigation against her, including at least: the facts under investigation, the alleged offenses, the prosecutor’s office in charge of the investigation, and the competent judicial authority overseeing the case. The State must allow the beneficiary and/or her representation to have access to the entire criminal file against her, if it exists, thereby allowing her to submit the corresponding appeals and guaranteeing her security in the processing of the file;
iii. consult and agree upon the measures to be adopted with the beneficiary and her representation; and
iv. report on the actions taken to investigate the alleged events that led to the adoption of these precautionary measures, so as to prevent such events from reoccurring. In particular, the State is requested to conduct an investigation with due diligence into the threats and acts of violence reported, including those that could have been against the beneficiary at the hands of State officials and/or agents.
The Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR) adopted on November 25, 2024 the Follow-up, Modification and Extension Resolution 87/2024 regarding the situation of Franklin Caldera Cordero in Venezuela (PM-125-19). The IACHR considered that the risk that places the beneficiary at risk has been observed since the granting of the precautionary measure, continues, and has been extended to his son, Franklin Caldera Martínez, as well as to his wife, Yuraima Martínez. Upon analyzing the submissions of fact and law, in the terms of Article 25 of its Rules of Procedure, the Commission concluded that the situation of Franklin Alfredo Caldera Cordero remains and it is extended to his son, Franklin Caldera Martínez, as well as to his wife, Yuraima Martínez. Consequently, the IACHR decided:
a) To continue to follow up on the situation of Franklin Alfredo Caldera Cordero;
b) To extend the precautionary measures in favor of Franklin Caldera Martínez (son) and Yuraima Martínez;
c) To modify the scope of these precautionary measures, and require that the State of Venezuela:
i. adopt the necessary measures to protect the rights to life and personal integrity of Franklin Alfredo Caldera Cordero, Franklin Caldera Martínez and Yuraima Martínez. In the case of Franklin Caldera Martínez, the measures must include those necessary to also protect his right to health;
ii. adopt the necessary measures to guarantee that Franklin Alfredo Caldera Cordero can continue to carry out his work as a human rights defender without being subjected to threats, intimidation, harassment or acts of violence in the exercise of his duties. In particular, it must formally inform the beneficiary of the existence of any investigation process against him, including at least: the facts under investigation, the crimes he is accused of, the prosecutor’s office in charge of the investigation, and the competent judicial authority in charge of the investigation. The State must allow the beneficiary and/or his representatives to have access to the entire criminal file against him, if it exists, allowing him to file the corresponding appeals and guaranteeing his security in its processing;
iii. implement the necessary measures to ensure that the conditions of detention of Franklin Caldera Martínez (son) are compatible with the applicable international standards on the matter, among them: guarantee that he is not subjected to violence, threats, intimidation, aggression and torture inside the prison; guarantee access to adequate and specialized medical care, as well as to the necessary treatment and medication, and immediately carry out a comprehensive medical assessment of his health situation; and evaluate the possibility of granting alternative measures to the deprivation of liberty given the impossibility of protecting his rights in light of the current conditions of detention;
iv. consult and agree upon the measures to be adopted with the beneficiaries and their representation; and
v. report on the actions taken to investigate the alleged facts that gave rise to the adoption and validity of these precautionary measures, so as to prevent such events from reoccurring. In particular, the State is requested to conduct an investigation with due diligence into the threats, allegations of torture and other acts of violence reported, including those that could have taken place by State officials and/or agents against the beneficiaries.
The Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR) adopted on August 21, 2024, the Follow-up and Extension Resolution 53/2024 regarding the situation of the authorities and members of the Gonzaya and Po Piyuya reservations of the Siona Indigenous People in Colombia (PM-395-18).
In the Resolution, the IACHR analyzed the information provided by the parties, positively evaluating the actions implemented by the State and considered that a risk identified in 2018 persists with respect to the reservations of the Siona Indigenous People. The Commission understands that the reported events are part of the actions of the illegal armed groups to consolidate their presence in the reservations and impose themselves on the indigenous authorities. The Commission also analyzed the situation of the human rights defender L.M.E.V., who has been the object of death threats from armed groups operating in the territory of the Indigenous Reservations. The Commission considered that the beneficiary is in a situation posing a serious risk to her rights to life and personal integrity. After analyzing the submissions of fact and law, the Commission considers that the risk has not ceased and, therefore, in accordance with the terms of Article 25 of the Rules of Procedure, the Commission:
On August 17, 2024, the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR) adopted Follow-up and Modification Resolution 51/2024 regarding the situation of Américo de Grazia in Venezuela (PM-359-16). The IACHR expressed particular concern about the continued risk faced by the beneficiary since the granting of the PM, without the State having adopted protection measures in his favor, and that the risk has increased after his official whereabouts have been unknown since August 8, 2024, following his alleged arbitrary detention by State agents in Caracas, Venezuela. The IACHR took note of complaints filed before different bodies regarding these facts. Upon analyzing the submissions of fact and law, in light of the context of repression in the post-election protests in Venezuela, the Commission believes that the current situation of Américo de Grazia is part of a cycle of events against him that seek to remove him from public debate. Therefore, under the terms of Article 25 of the Rules of Procedure, the IACHR requests that the State of Venezuela:
The Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR) adopted on August 14, 2024, the Follow-up and Modification Resolution 49/2024 in relation to the situation of Williams Dávila in Venezuela (PM-533-17). The IACHR expressed particular concern about the ongoing risk faced by the beneficiary since the granting of the PM, without the State having adopted protection measures in his favor, and that the risk has increased after his whereabouts have been unknown since August 8, 2024, following his alleged arbitrary detention by State agents in the Plaza de Los Palos Grandes, in Caracas, Venezuela. The IACHR took note of public information that a criminal complaint for “forced disappearance” was filed with the Public Prosecutor’s Office, highlighting the health situation of the beneficiary and recalling his status as an elderly person. After analyzing the submissions of fact and law, in light of the context of repression in the post-electoral protests in Venezuela, the Commission believes that the current situation of Williams Dávila is part of a cycle of events against him that seek to remove him from public debate. Therefore, pursuant to Article 25 of the Rules of Procedure, the IACHR requests that the State of Venezuela:
a) adopt the necessary measures to guarantee the life and personal integrity of Mr. Williams Dávila;
b) take the necessary measures to guarantee that Mr. Williams Dávila can carry out his activities as a member of the National Assembly without being subjected to threats, harassment, or acts of violence in the exercise of his functions;
c) report whether the beneficiary is in the custody of the State and his circumstances, or the measures to determine his whereabouts or fate;
d) consult and agree upon the measures to be implemented with the beneficiary and his representatives; and
e) report on the actions taken to investigate the alleged facts that led to the adoption of this resolution, so as to prevent them from reoccurring.
The Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR) adopted on May 6, 2024 the Follow-up Resolution 27/2024, in relation to the situation of José Daniel Ferrer García, who is being held in inadequate conditions of deprivation of liberty in Cuba (PM-484-11). The IACHR expressed particular concern about the State’s unwillingness to engage in dialogue, noting that, on the contrary, all the information available, both in the instant matter and through the monitoring of the situation in the country, allows this Commission to affirm that State agents are taking actions that intensify the situation that places the beneficiary at risk, instead of mitigating it. Consequently, the Commission decided as follows:
On April 29, 2024, the IACHR decided to follow up and extend precautionary measures in favor of members of the Venezuelan Program of Education-Action on Human Rights in Venezuela. According to the request, the members of PROVEA are at risk in the context of their work as human rights defenders in the current situation of Venezuela, considering the visibility of the institution and its coordinators, the frequent stigmatizing remarks made by high-ranking State authorities in the media, and the surveillance and monitoring by State agents. Consequently, under the terms of Article 25 of its Rules of Procedure, the IACHR decided to require that Venezuela:
The Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR) decided to issue the present Resolution on Follow-up of precautionary measures in accordance with the terms of Article 25 of its Rules of Procedure. The Commission evaluated the actions taken by the State in favor of the beneficiaries and considered that a situation of risk persists, as well as making assessments regarding the scope of the measures. Consequently, in accordance with Article 25 of the IACHR Rules of Procedure, the Commission decided as follows: