|
|
Administrative Tribunal (TRIBAD)
Administrative Tribunal (TRIBAD)
  •  

Documents

Advanced search

SearchClear

This Search uses AND operators, it only returns documents with ALL the keywords you entered/selected.

Miguel Tejada Bailly v. Secretary General of the Organization of American States

Document Code (Number)102
Category:Judgment
Year:1989
Language:English
Keywords: Decision, Competence, Formal requirements, Judicial review, Right of appeal, Interpretation, Quashing, Breach, Costs, Definition, Discretion, Executive Head, Organization's interests, Termination, Appraisal of evidence, Burden of proof, Evidence, Internal Appeal Body, Internal remedies exhausted, Lack of evidence, Precedence of rules, Health reasons, Time bar, Joinder, Nullity, Omission, Bias, Contract, Decision-maker, Formal flaw, Working relations, Grounds, Administration, Limits, Negligence, Disciplinary measure, Judicial economy, General Standards - article 53, Internal appeal, Transfer, Work appraisal, Due process, Resignation, Abuse of process, Staff member's duties, Right, Staff member's right, Right to replay, Duty to comply, Disciplinary Body, Disciplinary procedure, General principle, Misconduct, Summary dismissal, Unsatisfactory service, Staff regulations and rules, Dissenting opinion, Employment relationship, Supervisor, Staff Rules - rule 110.5, Headquarters, Enforcement, Vexatious complaint, Serious misconduct, Insubordination, Staff Rules - rule 110.5 (a), Expert opinion, Identical claims, Identical facts, Identical parties, General Standards - article 20, American Convention on Human Rights, Like circumstances, Staff Rules - rule 105.2 (e), Staff Rules - rule 105.9, Staff Rules - rule 105.9 (f), Staff Rules - rule 107.1 (a)(viii), Staff Rules - rule 110.4 (c)
Documents to download:

María Eugenia Thomae-Forgues v. Secretary General of the Organization of American States

Document Code (Number)100
Category:Judgment
Year:1988
Language:English
Keywords: Decision, Competence, Judgment, Judicial review, Right of appeal, Abolition of post, Interpretation, Reassingment, Breach, Charter of the OAS - article 119, Complaint allowed, Complaint allowed in part, Costs, Damages, Discretion, Executive Head, Injury, Offensive expressions, Organization's interests, Procedural flaw, Receivability, Payment, Internal remedies exhausted, Organization's duties, Reinstatement, Time limit, Rules of Procedure - article 12.3, Acquired right, Legitimate expectation, Joinder, Previous question, Nullity, Bias, Binding character, Contract, Decision-maker, Non-renewal, Competition, Reorganization, Repeal, Working relations, General Standards - article 17 (b), Fitness, Grounds, Administration, Administrative delay, Disciplinary measure, Fixed term, Judicial economy, New claim, Internal appeal, Procedure, Transfer, Work appraisal, Due process, New plea, Provision, Suspensive action, Creation of post, General Standards - article 11, Budgetary reasons, Consent, Lack of consent, Statute - article VI, No provision, Staff member's duties, Terminal entitlements, Right, Staff member's right, Staff Rules - rule 104.2, Internal remedies, Staff member, Staff Rules, Statute, Duty to comply, General Standards, Warning of Tribunal, Execution, General Standards - article 56 (d), General principle, Staff member's interest, Claim, General Standards - article 1, General Standards - article 17, International civil service, Staff regulations and rules, Complaint, Charter of the OAS, General Standards - article 16, OAS, Supervisor, Staff Rules - rule 110.5, Staff Rules - rule 104.3, Enforcement, Statute - article VI.1, Statute - article VI.1 (b), Conduct, Reckoning, Absence, Direct appeal, Final decision, Misuse of authority, Budget, Insubordination, Organization, Rules of Procedure, Rules of Procedure - article 12, Internal competition, General Standards - article 57, General Standards - article 58, Charter of the OAS - article 13, Extension, General Standards - article 16 (b), General Standards - article 17 (b)(vi), General Standards - article 18, General Standards - article 49, General Standards - article 56, General Standards - article 59, General Standards - article 72, Identical claims, Identical facts, Identical parties, Respect, Rules of Procedure - article 10, Staff Rules - rule 101.7, Staff Rules - rule 110.2
Documents to download:

Marijane E. Peplow v. Secretary General of the Organization of American States

Document Code (Number)88
Category:Judgment
Year:1985
Language:English
Keywords: Decision, Post classification, Competence, Formal requirements, Judicial review, Right of appeal, Statute - article I, Interpretation, Offer, Reassingment, Breach, Costs, Discretion, Equal treatment, Executive Head, Injury, Organization's interests, Termination, Appraisal of evidence, Burden of proof, Evidence, Organization's duties, Staff reduction, Recommendation, Mistake, Testimony, Nullity, Binding character, Contract, Decision-maker, Competition, Disclosure of evidence, Equality of conditions, Priority, Qualifications, Seniority, Vacancy, Working relations, General Standards - article 17 (b), Fitness, Report, Administration, Limits, Disciplinary measure, Internal appeal, Adversarial proceeding, Transfer, Work appraisal, Due process, Flaw, New plea, Budgetary reasons, Staff member's right, Right to replay, Post, Audit, International career service, General principle, Staff member's interest, Unsatisfactory service, Staff Rules - rule 110.6, International civil service, Staff regulations and rules, Staff Rules - rule 105.2, Double jeopardy, Statement of intent, Waiver, Staff Reduction Board, General Standards - article 17 (a) (v), Staff Rules - rule 110.6 (m), General Assembly - AG/RES.561 (XI-O/81), Personnel file, Administrative act, Case law, Confirmatory decision, Independence, Intent, Misuse of authority, Performance report, Plea, Procedural economy, Staff Rules - rule 110.4
Documents to download:

Isabel Chaly Caserta v. Secretary General of the Organization of American States

Document Code (Number)14
Category:Judgment
Year:1975
Language:English
Keywords: Competence, Interpretation, Cause of action, Charter of the OAS - article 119, Complaint allowed in part, Damages, Discretion, Executive Head, Notification, Receivability, Advisory body, Advisory opinion, Appraisal of evidence, Burden of proof, Evidence, Internal Appeal Body, International civil service principles, Lack of evidence, Recommendation, Rules of Procedure - article 22.1 (1972), Candidate, Decision-maker, Internal candidate, Competition, Equality of conditions, General Standards - article 17 (1973), General Standards - article 17 (b) (1973), General Standards - article 38 (1973), Priority, Qualifications, Vacancy, Grounds, Charter of the OAS - article 121, Charter of the OAS - article 126, General Standards - article 11 (b) (1973), General Standards - article 35 (1973), Geographical distribution, International civil servant, Intervention, Limits, Negligence, Promotion, Selection Board, Staff Rules - rule 104.1 (1971), Staff Rules - rule 104.1 (b) (1971), Staff Rules - rule 104.11 (b) (1971), Statute - article VII
Documents to download:

Edmund V. Uehling v. Secretary General of the Organization of American States

Document Code (Number)8
Category:Judgment
Year:1974
Language:English
Keywords: Offer, Successive contracts, Breach, Complaint allowed in part, Damages, Extension of services, General principles, Injury, Notification, Evidence, Lack of evidence, Organization's duties, Terms of appointment, Legitimate expectation, Annual leave, Bias, Binding character, Candidate, Contract, Conversion, Decision-maker, Formal flaw, Good faith, Intention, Internal candidate, Law of contract, Material injury, Non-renewal, Permanent appointment, Staff Rules - rule 104.2 (f) (1971)
Documents to download: