|
|

Documents

This Search uses AND operators, it only returns documents with ALL the keywords you entered/selected.

Miguel Tejada Bailly v. Secretary General of the Organization of American States

Document Code (Number)102
Category:Judgment
Year:1989
Language:English
Keywords: Decision, Competence, Formal requirements, Judicial review, Right of appeal, Interpretation, Quashing, Breach, Costs, Definition, Discretion, Executive Head, Organization's interests, Termination, Appraisal of evidence, Burden of proof, Evidence, Internal Appeal Body, Internal remedies exhausted, Lack of evidence, Precedence of rules, Health reasons, Time bar, Joinder, Nullity, Omission, Bias, Contract, Decision-maker, Formal flaw, Working relations, Grounds, Administration, Limits, Negligence, Disciplinary measure, Judicial economy, General Standards - article 53, Internal appeal, Transfer, Work appraisal, Due process, Resignation, Abuse of process, Staff member's duties, Right, Staff member's right, Right to replay, Duty to comply, Disciplinary Body, Disciplinary procedure, General principle, Misconduct, Summary dismissal, Unsatisfactory service, Staff regulations and rules, Dissenting opinion, Employment relationship, Supervisor, Staff Rules - rule 110.5, Headquarters, Enforcement, Vexatious complaint, Serious misconduct, Insubordination, Staff Rules - rule 110.5 (a), Expert opinion, Identical claims, Identical facts, Identical parties, General Standards - article 20, American Convention on Human Rights, Like circumstances, Staff Rules - rule 105.2 (e), Staff Rules - rule 105.9, Staff Rules - rule 105.9 (f), Staff Rules - rule 107.1 (a)(viii), Staff Rules - rule 110.4 (c)
Documents to download:

Hugo D. Valverde et al. v. Secretary General of the Organization of American States

Document Code (Number)91
Category:Judgment
Year:1985
Language:English
Keywords: Competence, Formal requirements, Judicial review, Right of appeal, Interpretation, Breach, Cause of action, Costs, Discretion, Executive Head, Receivability, Internal remedies exhausted, Time bar, Time limit, Previous question, Nullity, Omission, Binding character, Contract, Formal flaw, Intention, Law of contract, Parity with United Nations, Salary, Scale, Limits, Flaw, Budgetary reasons, Statute - article II, Abuse of process, General Assembly, Settlement out of court, Collective bargaining, General principle, Statement of intent, Waiver, General Assembly - AG/RES.383 (VI-E/78), General Assembly - AG/RES.498 (X-O/80), General Assembly - AG/RES.562 (XI-O/81), Staff Union Agreement, General Assembly - AG/RES.632 (XII-O/82), Power of attorney, Reckoning, Case law, Further submissions, Comparator system, Cost-of-living adjustment, Fraud, Further material, General Assembly - AG/RES.652 (XIII-O/83), Permanent Council - CP/doc.1177/81 add. 1, Referendum, Staff Rules - chapter XII, Statute - article IX
Documents to download:

Judgment No

Document Code (Number)36
Category:Judgment
Year:1978
Language:English
Keywords: Post classification, Abolition of post, Application, Interpretation, Quashing, Breach, Complaint allowed in part, Discretion, Executive Head, General principles, Injury, Notification, Procedural flaw, Appraisal of evidence, Internal Appeal Body, Organization's duties, Patere legem, Post description, Nullity, Competition, Vacancy, Selection Board, Due process, Abuse of process, Competition cancelled, General Standards - article 17 (a) (1977), No provision, Request for quashing, Staff Rules - rule 102.3 (e) (1976), Staff Rules - rule 104.3 (1976)
Documents to download: