|
Social conditions
The basin's population has traditionally maintained
strong social and commercial ties across the border and it is common
to find family relationships among them. However, as in many parts
of the region, population growth over the last 20 years on both
sides of the border brings in “outsiders” and change—not all of
it positive. All quality-of-life indicators are lower than their
respective national averages in both parts of the basin . The cantons
of Upala, Los Chiles, Guatusos, and La Cruz in Costa Rica have significantly
lower social development indicators in housing, education, electrification,
sewage, communications, and health—the last even deteriorating in
recent years. While the Nicaraguan portion of the basin has 18.4%
of the national population, it also has 36% of the poor population
and 43.2% of the nation's indigents.
Costa Rican Sector: Costa Rica’s “Social
Development Index” is based on a number of variables including education
infrastructure, access to special education programs, infant mortality,
deaths between the ages of zero and five relative to the general
death rate, height of the population entering the first grade, average
monthly use of electricity and births to unwed mothers. The index
can vary between 0 and 100 with the higher numbers indicating better
social conditions. For the cantons in the SJRB, index figures average
28.7 with a high of 45.5 and a low of 8.9. Four of the cantons fell
below 30 and three were above 40 (Table 3).
Table 3: Social Development Index
for Costa Rican Sector of the SJRB.
| Canton |
Population |
Extension (km²) |
SDI |
| San Carlos |
107,194 |
3,347.98 |
45.5 |
| Upala |
39,760 |
1,580.67 |
17.4 |
| Los Chiles |
22,292 |
1,358.86 |
8.9 |
| Guatuso |
14,968 |
758.32 |
40.5 |
| San Carlos |
42,848 |
2,140.54 |
28.5 |
| Sarapiquí |
14,830 |
1,383.90 |
16.4 |
| Pococí |
99,856 |
2,403.49 |
43.8 |
Because of job scarcity in Nicaragua, laborers
tend to migrate from Nicaragua to Costa Rica, where more work opportunities
exist. This flow of migrants is highest during the sugar cane harvest
periods and, since many of these become permanent immigrants, an
agreement between both countries regulates the phenomenon.
Still, the population in the Costa Rican sector
has doubled in the last 20 years. Now, the rural population represents
85% of the total and the economically active population is 44%.
The primary sector, where payment tends to be made according to
productivity, employs nearly 73% of these. In the last decades,
except for agriculture, real salaries have tended to decrease and
they are seldom sufficient to satisfy basic needs.
Population in rural areas is scattered and the
majority lack basic services and sanitation. Ninety-nine percent
of the homes in population centers have public water supply. By
contrast, only 62% of the homes in rural areas have water supply
service. Water in the SJRB is supplied through storage tanks and
a distribution system, springs, drilled and hand dug wells, rain
catchments (cisterns), or directly from a river. Only the first
source is of guaranteed quality; the remaining sources are risky
at best.
Sixty-one percent of the population uses septic
tanks and the remainder use latrines and cesspools. Any of these
systems are susceptible to overflow during flooding with the rainy
season (especially in the low-lying areas) causing contamination
of wells, streams and rivers and resulting in intestinal and other
parasitic illnesses, and propagation of disease vectors that can
cause epidemics of dengue fever, and malaria.
Solid waste collection services are available
to just 32% of the urban population and 0% of the rural population.
Consequently, almost all solid waste eventually ends up in the river.
Basic education is limited—there are approximately
640 primary and 40 intermediate level education centers in the entire
Costa Rican portion of the basin. Because of this, and the need
to begin work at an early age, the literacy rate is 84.6%, high
for many parts of the world, but low for Costa Rica.
Health coverage is also deficient with just 24
confinement centers (clinics and hospitals) for a population of
nearly 290,000 inhabitants. The area has additional rural health
posts, children's centers that offer full health attention and health
education and nutrition centers that provide outpatient services.
Nicaraguan Sector: A significant population
increase has also occurred in the Nicaraguan sector in the last
30 years, from 300,000 inhabitants in 1971 to an estimated 780,000
currently. Unemployment and underemployment rates in the basin are
higher than in the rest of the nation. Nearly one-half of the population
is under 15 years of age.
All social indicators show significantly low values
(Table 4). Approximately 93% of the urban population and 39% of
the rural population are provided with potable water service— mainly
from groundwater sources because of the population centers east
of Lake Nicaragua. Water is provided through urban and rural piped
distribution systems and manually pumped wells. A reduction in service
can occur during intensely dry periods.
Twenty-two percent of the urban population is
served by sewage disposal systems. Much of the rural population
uses latrines—between 38 and 79% depending on the area, although
the San Juan River Department has a coverage rate of just 17%. Solid
waste is collected only in urban areas, but is limited with respect
to equipment and efficient operation.
The average literacy rate is approximately 80%,
but in the rural areas it reaches only 55%. Health services are
deficient; the average ratio is 710 inhabitants/bed but, again,
the San Juan River Department, at 1,362 inhabitants/bed is far below
the remainder of the basin. The average number of inhabitants per
home is six.
Table 4: Selected social indicators
from the Nicaraguan Sector of the SJRB.
| Indicators |
Rivas |
Granada |
Masaya |
Boaco |
Chontales |
San Juan |
% |
| Schooling (%) |
20.1 |
25.1 |
28.1 |
10.85 |
10.9 |
16.8 |
18.2 |
| Preschool |
86.7 |
87.3 |
99.6 |
73.7 |
61.6 |
76.0 |
80.4 |
| Primary School |
21.1 |
18.9 |
38.8 |
16.6 |
16.4 |
7.0 |
25.0 |
| Secondary School |
n.d. |
1.3 |
0.05 |
0.2 |
0.5 |
0.4 |
0.7 |
| Health |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Mal nutrition |
27.8 |
26.6 |
31.8 |
31.4 |
23.2 |
18.1 |
26.0 |
| Infant |
603 |
470 |
887 |
308 |
687 |
1.362 |
710 |
| Inhabitants/bed |
n.d. |
n.d. |
n.d. |
n.d. |
n.d. |
n.d. |
n.d. |
| Sewage Treatment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Urban |
41 |
20 |
41 |
53 |
|
1 |
31.2 |
| Rural |
86 |
64 |
85 |
69 |
77 |
17 |
66.3 |
| Water Connection |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Urban |
92 |
103 |
92 |
92 |
75 |
64 |
96.3 |
| Rural |
31 |
44 |
59 |
25 |
35 |
15 |
34.8 |
| Housing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Occupants/Hshld |
5.7 |
5.8 |
5.7 |
5.9 |
6.3 |
5.9 |
5.9 |
|