The Bahamian International Cooperation Regime for Criminal
Matters
The Bahamian legal system is modeled on the common law system
inherited from the United Kingdom. In that regard in order for its
Courts to give effect to a Treaty signed by the Government of The
Bahamas, the Courts must have evidence that the provisions of the
treaty are reflected in domestic legislation.
The Bahamas is a Party to the 1988 United Nations Convention
against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic
Substances. The Criminal Justice (International Co-operation) Act
2000 (No. 42 of 2000), enables The Bahamas to implement some of the
provisions of the United Nations Convention against Illicit Traffic
in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances as it applies to
offences at sea on Bahamian registered ships or ships registered in
Convention States.
The Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters Treaty signed by
the Governments of The Bahamas and the United States of America on
12th June 1987 and 8th August 1987 respectively, is given domestic
effect by the Mutual Legal Assistance (Criminal Matters) Act 1988
(No.2 of 1988). The said legislation came into force on 20th August
1990. The Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty signed with Canada on the
13th March, 1990 is given domestic effect by the Mutual Legal
Asssistance Criminal Matters Act, 1988 (Amendment of Schedule)
Order, 1990 (S.I. No. 54 of 1990). Under both Treaties the Attorney
General of The Commonwealth of The Bahamas is the Central Authority
to whom requests for assistance should be addressed.
In the absence of a Treaty and its relevant domestic enabling
legislation, a foreign Court, tribunal or authority seeking
evidence or the disclosure of information in connection with
criminal proceedings that have been instituted, or a criminal
investigation that is being carried on, must apply to the Attorney
General for assistance pursuant to the provisions of the Criminal
Justice (International Co-operation) Act, 2000 (No.42 of 2000).
If the Attorney General is satisfied that an offence under the
law of the country has been committed or that there are reasonable
grounds for suspecting that such an offence has been committed and
that proceedings in respect of that offence have been instituted in
that country or that an investigation into that offence is being
carried on there, the Attorney General may, after consultation with
the Chief Justice, by written notice nominate a court in The
Bahamas to receive the evidence to which the request relates. Where
it appears to the Attorney General that the request relates
exclusively to a fiscal offence, he shall not exercise his powers
unless the request is made pursuant to a tax information exchange
treaty to which The Bahamas is a party.
Request for evidence or information, which is not within the
public domain, are subject to a court application. Such
applications are made by the attorneys within the Office of the
Attorney General. In order to proceed with a court application, the
request must be accompanied by:
- Official English translations where relevant
- A brief factual outline of the case and the offences/charges
involved, as a synopsis of the case will have to be included in the
Court documents which have to be prepared for the court
application;
- Certified copies of any and all documents referred to in the
letter of request as they are exhibited to the request.
- An indication from the requesting court, tribunal or authority
whether the evidence to be transmitted is to be accompanied by a
certificate, affidavit or other verifying documents.
In those instances where a foreign court, tribunal or authority
is requesting bank documents or that bank officials be questioned
relative to bank accounts and bank customers, the request must
clearly show:
- The name of the bank and/or the bank account number;
- Any evidence that the person(s) opened or caused the account(s)
to be opened or exercised control over the account(s);
- A list of relevant questions to be posted to the bank
official.
Sometimes the request may include a request that certain
individuals from the requesting state be present during the
examination of a witness. Foreign judicial officers and foreign
attorneys have no right of appearance before the Bahamian Court.
Should such persons wish to attend the examination of a witness,
permission must be sought from the Court. This information must be
included in documents which are to be presented to the Court.
The court documents which must be prepared to commence the court
application are an Ex Parte Summons which is accompanied by an Ex
Parte Affidavit. These documents are filed in the Registry of the
Supreme Court. The filing of the Ex Parte Summons and Ex Parte
Affidavit and the subsequent assigning of an action number by the
Supreme Court Registry officially commences the action in the Court
system. When the Ex Parte Summons and Ex Parte Affidavit have been
filed in the Supreme Court Registry, a date is obtained in order to
have the application heard by a Judge of the Supreme Court. Such
applications are heard by Judges in Chambers as opposed to open
court.
Attorneys from the Office of the Attorney General make all
formal submissions relative to the application and the request.
Once the Judge hears the application and accedes to it, a Court
Order is made relative to the application. The Court Order must be
perfected or signed by the Judge. It is then filed in the Supreme
Court Registry and served on the relevant parties.
If the request requires the questioning of a witness and that
the witness should produce certain documents at his/her
examination, a date must be obtained for an Examiner or some other
appropriate Officer authorized by the Court to proceed with the
questioning of the witness. Once a date has been obtained, then the
Court Order compelling the witness to appear to answer the question
on oath, together with a Notice of Trial advising of the date of
questioning must be served on the witness.
If during the examination of a witness an official from the
requesting state is present and requires additional questions
arising from any answers given in evidence by the witness, those
questions must be posed through the legal officer from the Office
of the Attorney General who must seek the permission of the
Examiner for the question(s) to be put to the witness. The actual
question is put to the witness by the Examiner. Any evidence given
during the hearing before the Examiner is taken down by a Court
stenographer. Sometimes a witness may have his/her attorney present
to protect his/her interest. That attorney is also allowed to
request the Court's permission for any additional questions which
may arise on examination of the witness. Under the Criminal Justice
(International Co-operation) Act, 2000, a witness may claim
privilege in certain circumstances defined in the Act. A new
amendment to the Rules of the Supreme Court provides for the
procedure which should be followed if a witness claims
privilege.
After the questioning of the witness the Examiner then prepares
the evidence taken in the appropriate form for eventual
transmission to the requesting Court, tribunal or authority.
The above procedure presupposes that the application for
obtaining the evidence is not challenged. If it is, then this may
involve additional applications and Chambers hearings before a
Supreme Court Judge. The evidence received by the Court pursuant to
a request is sent to the Attorney General for transmission to the
court, tribunal or authority which made the request.
In addition to the foregoing the establishment of the Financial
Intelligence Unit under the provisions of the Financial
Intelligence Unit Act (No. 39 of 2000) now means that the Financial
Intelligence Unit is responsible for receiving, analyzing,
obtaining and disseminating information which relates to or may
relate to the proceeds of crime under the provisions of the
Proceeds of Crime Act, 2000 (No. 44 of 2000) namely offences under
the Prevention of Bribery Act, drug trafficking offences, money
laundering offences, offences which may be tried on information
other than drug trafficking offences and offences committed
anywhere that if they occurred in The Bahamas would constitute
offences in The Bahamas. The Act provides the principal legal
mechanism for international cooperation with other foreign
Financial Intelligence Units and law enforcement authorities.
Pursuant to the Financial Intelligence Unit Act, the Unit may now
provide information relating to the commission of an offence
specified in the Proceeds of Crime Act, 2000 to any Foreign
Financial Intelligence Unit, subject to any conditions as may be
considered appropriate by the Director of the Financial
Intelligence Unit of The Bahamas. Under the Act, the Unit is given
power to enter into any agreement or arrangement, in writing, with
a Foreign Financial Intelligence Unit which the Director considers
necessary or desirable for the discharge or performance of the
functions of the Financial Intelligence Unit.
In addition, upon receipt of a request from a Foreign Financial
Intelligence Unit, the Unit may, without having to first obtain a
Court order, order any person to refrain from completing any
transaction for a seventy-two hour period. Additionally, upon
receipt of a request from a Foreign Financial Intelligence Unit or
law enforcement authority, the Unit may order any person to freeze
a person's bank account for a period not exceeding five days, if
satisfied that the request relates to the proceeds of an offence
specified in the Proceeds of Crime Act, 2000. If the Unit is acting
under this provision, an aggrieved person may apply to a Judge in
Chambers to discharge the asset freezing order. However, such an
application does not suspend the freezing order pending the
determination by the Court. The Unit also has the power to require
the production of information, excluding information subject to
legal professional privilege that the Unit considers relevant to
fulfill its function.
The Financial Intelligence Unit is also responsible for the
receipt and analysis of suspicious transaction reports required to
be made under the provisions of the new Financial Transactions
Reporting Act, 2000 (No.40 of 2000). Under the Financial
Transactions Reporting Act, 2000 financial institutions within The
Bahamas are now required under penalty of law to verify the
identification of customers and to report suspicious transactions
which they know, suspect or have reasonable grounds to suspect
involves proceeds of criminal conduct as defined in the Proceeds of
Crime Act, 2000, or any offence under the Proceeds of Crime Act,
2000, or an attempt to avoid the enforcement of any provision of
the Proceeds of Crime Act to the Financial Intelligence Unit. For
purposes of the Financial Transactions Reporting Act, a `financial
institution is broadly defined as a bank or trust company licensed
under the Banks and Trust Companies Regulation Act, 2000; a company
carrying on life assurance business as defined in the Insurance
Act; a co-operative society registered under the Co-operative
Societies Act; a friendly society enrolled under the Friendly
Societies Act; a licensed casino operator within the meaning of the
Lotteries and Gaming Act; a broker-dealer within the meaning of the
Securities Industry Act; a real estate broker for the purpose of
settling real estate transactions; a trustee or administration
manager or investment manager of a superannuation scheme; a mutual
fund administrator or operator within the meaning of the Mutual
Funds act; any person whose business or a principal part of whose
business consists of borrowing or lending or investing money,
administering or managing funds on behalf of other persons, acting
as trustee in respect of funds of other persons, dealing in life
assurance policies, providing financial services that involve the
transfer or exchange of funds; counsel and attorney for the purpose
of deposit or investment, settling real estate transactions or for
holding in a client's account; an accountant who receives funds for
the purpose of deposit or investment.
Should the analysis of any suspicious transaction report or
other information by the Financial Intelligence Unit lead to a
decision that an investigation should take place, that information
is passed on to the Money Laundering and Asset Forfeiture Section
of the Drug Enforcement Unit of the Royal Bahamas Police Force.
That section is responsible for the investigation of suspected
cases of money laundering and other matters, which may lead to
asset forfeiture.
The Financial Intelligence Unit (Designation of Foreign
Financial Intelligence Units) Order 2001 when enacted would
designate all the Foreign Financial Units that are a part of the
Egmont Group.
The Proceeds of Crime Act, 2000 makes provisions for the search,
seizure and confiscating of the proceeds of crime and the
registration of foreign confiscation orders. The Proceeds of Crime
(Designated Countries and Territories) Order 2001 (S.I. No 6 of
2001) provides a system for the registration of external
confiscation orders by modifying the Proceeds of Crime Act for the
purposes of external confiscation orders only. The modified Act
which is set out in the Third Schedule defines an external
confiscation order as an order of a court in a Designated Country
or Territory made for the purpose of recovering property gained as
a result of drug trafficking or any other relevant offence, or
depriving a person of a pecuniary advantage similarly gained. The
enforcement of an external confiscation order may be facilitated by
any of the Orders available to a Bahamian Court under the Proceeds
of Crime Act, 2000 for domestic purposes. In addition, property
recovered under an external confiscation order is paid to the Court
to be applied towards satisfaction of the external confiscation
order.
The Proceeds of Crime (Designated Countries and Territories)
Order 2001, sets out a list of Designated Countries and Territories
from which external confiscation orders may be registered and
enforced in The Bahamas. As a result of The Proceeds of Crime
(Designated Countries and Territories) Order 2001 confiscation
orders made in any designated country can be registered in The
Bahamas as an external confiscation order and any property owned by
the person against whom the confiscation order is made may be
confiscated in The Bahamas if the Court accedes to the order. The
Order sets out the procedural steps which must be taken in the
various Designated Countries and Territories in order for
proceedings to have been commenced in accordance with the Proceeds
of Crime Act, 2000. Property potentially the subject of an external
confiscation order may be restrained pending the completion of
criminal proceedings in the designated country. In addition the
Order sets out in relation to each Designated Country and Territory
the authority therein competent to issue a registrable and
enforceable external confiscation order. Where the order does not
specify an appropriate authority for a Designated Country or
Territory, the Attorney General of The Bahamas may supply the
Bahamian Court with a certificate stating that the issuing
authority of the external confiscation order is the appropriate
one.
The Order provides that any judgment or order purporting to bear
the seal of a court in a Designated Country or Territory or to have
been signed by a judge or magistrate of a Designated Country or
Territory will be deemed without further proof to be the signed or
sealed document which it purports to be. Certified copies of these
documents are treated in the same manner.
Certificates from Designated Countries and Territories
purporting to have been issued by the appropriate authority and
stating that proceedings have been or are to be commenced there;
the Defendant has been notified of the proceedings or contemplated
proceedings; sums remain payable under the external confiscation
order, which is in force and not subject to appeal; any other
person affected has been notified; and an order has been or will be
made, which will have the purpose of recovering payments or other
rewards, shall be accepted as being what they purport to be, and
the statements contained therein will be taken as evidence of their
truth.
|