|
|
THIRD
REGULAR MEETING
OF
THE ASSEMBLY OF THE CITEL
August
12-16, 2002
Washington,
DC. United States
|
OEA/Ser.L/XVII.2.3
CITEL/inf.
267/02
12
August 2002
Original:
English
|
|
|
|
|
REMARKS
OF AMBASSADOR LUIGI R. EINAUDI, ASSISTANT SECRETARY GENERAL OF THE
ORGANIZATION OF AMERICAN STATES AT THE OPENING OF THE III REGULAR
ASSEMBLY OF CITEL
WASHINGTON,
D.C. AUGUST 12, 2002
Mr.
Chairman of the OAS's Permanent Council, Ambassador Roger Noriega
Mr. Chairman of COM/CITEL, José Pileggi Veliz
Sr. Marcelo
Kohan, Secretario de Comunicaciones de la República Argentina
Mr. General
Secretary of the ITU , Yoshio
Utsumi
Mr. Executive Secretary of CITEL, Clovis Baptista
Messrs. Chairmen and Vice Chairmen of the Working Groups and of
the Permanent Consultative Committees
Distinguished Delegates, ladies and gentlemen
It
is very gratifying for the OAS General Secretariat to host this
III Regular Assembly of CITEL in this beautiful Hall of the
Americas. Let me begin by reconfirming to you, Mr. Chairman, and
with you all of the members of this unusual and highly effective
regional body, the high regard which the Secretary General and I
have for CITEL, its work and its accomplishments.
Exactly forty
years ago, in July of 1962, here in this building, the Secretariat
hosted a meeting of fourteen telecommunications experts to draw up
proposals for enhancing telecommunications in the region following
the recommendations that issued
from the Charter approved
by the Heads of State and Governments attending the Summit
at Punta del Este, Uruguay. That Charter recognized that
inadequate communications constitute an obstacle to economic
growth in the hemisphere. Of those fourteen experts, ten were from
Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, Mexico, Peru, the
United States, Uruguay and Venezuela, original Member States of
this Organization.
They
were assisted, even then, by experts from the International
Telecommunications Union, the World Bank, and the Inter-American
Development Bank.
The experts
made a series of recommendations on the planning and operations of
a telecommunication network that would link all OAS member
countries.
The
recommendations included a draft Statute on the establishment of
an OAS commission, which they called the "Inter-American
Telecommunication Commission" more commonly now
known by its acronym, CITEL.
Much has changed since then. I am pleased to note the
participation, defined in terms of Member States in this III
Regular Assembly has doubled and all regional groupings are now
represented.
This is
a sign not only of the independence of the English Speaking
Caribbean and with it the growth in number of OAS Member States,
but also of the recognition by everyone of the importance of
telecommunications to development.
CITEL is in fact an unusual and perhaps unique example of
effective integration in the Hemisphere of our governments and the
private sector.
CITEL
has over 200 Associate Members from the private sector, working
with us as partners to further the development of the region's
telecommunications sector.
Acting
as a catalyst for Member States, CITEL has facilitated the
presentation in the International Telecommunication Union (ITU)
and other international fora of common Inter-American proposals
benefiting both states and the private sector.
The
excellent working relationship, in fact, between CITEL and the ITU
is an important phenomenon to be commended.
I would like to personally express the appreciation of the
OAS for the continued participation of the ITU in our activities
in the Americas. This cooperation was important forty years ago
when CITEL was founded and it is obviously even more so today, in
the increasingly global context in which we live.
The
publication in the year 2000 by CITEL with ITU and the AHCIET (Asociación
Hispanoamericana de Centros de Investigación y Empresas de
Telecomunicaciones) entitled Services for all: Universal
service in the Americas is evidence of how this
cooperation can work to our common benefit.
I have
taken a look at the agenda for this Assembly.
As an outsider, it appears comprehensive and ambitious.
I think there is probably no more important element in it
than the Agenda for Connectivity in the Americas
that was set forth by the Heads of State and Government gathered
in the Summit of the Americas in Quebec in 2001.
We in the OAS recognize the strategic importance of Summits
for setting a common framework and direction for us and of
telecommunications in attempting meet the challenges of the
twenty-first century.
CITEL must combine the introduction of state-of-the-art
technologies that ensure the efficient handling of information
with the adoption of policies, strategies and programs that will
foster development of the telecommunications sector in ways that
raise the standard of living and reinforce the skills and know-how
of all citizens in the Hemisphere.
To make
the Agenda for Connectivity a reality, we are relying heavily on
you to influence the development of the telecommunications
infrastructure and services essential to free and fair competition
in the services.
The
Plan of Action of Quito is the initial step in the
implementation of the Agenda for Connectivity.
With it, CITEL has provided OAS member states with a set of
regional strategies to enable all the people of the Americas to
develop the tools to access and share knowledge that will allow
them to participate more fully in the Information Age.
As a politically oriented person, I commend particularly,
the strong focus of CITEL members on strategies to ensure
universal coverage of telecommunication services among all
population groups in the Hemisphere.
From the days of Jean-Jacques Rousseau's concern that
citizenship was most meaningful within the confines of a city
state where an orator's voice could reach all citizens, to modern
studies of nationalism and social communication, the interaction
between politics and communication has raised central issues for
democracy.
Your
commitment to support the process of democratization in this
hemisphere to effectively expand telecommunications service
coverage, giving priority to the delivery of service to isolated
regions and to the most vulnerable population groups under the
principal of universal service is a recognition of communication
as an essential human right.
Mr.Chairman, Chairs of Working Groups and of the Permanent
Consultative Committees, delegates, I know you have much work
ahead of you to establish CITEL's framework for the four years
until your next assembly.
Based on your past achievements, I am sure that not only
are you going prove up to the task, but that you will exceed
expectations. It is not by chance that I said that you are one of
the most effective bodies in the Hemisphere. You have our best
wishes for the success of your deliberations.
Thank you Mr. Chairman.
|
|