ANNUAL REPORT OF THE OFFICE OF THE SPECIAL RAPPORTEUR FOR
FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION
2010
Access to report in PDF or in WORD
INDEX
TABLE OF ACRONYMS AND REFERENCES
INTRODUCTION
CHAPTER I GENERAL INFORMATION
A. Creation of the Office of the Special Rapporteur for Freedom of Expression and Institutional Support
B. Mandate of the Office of the Special Rapporteur
C. Principal Activities of the Office of the Special Rapporteur
1. Individual Case System: Strategic Litigation on Freedom of Expression within the inter-American System
2. Precautionary Measures
3. Public Hearings
4. Official Visits
5. Seminars and Workshops with Strategic Actors in the Region
6. Annual Report and development of expert knowledge
7. Special statements and declarations: using the bully pulpit
D. Staff of the Office of the Special Rapporteur
E. Funding
CHAPTER II EVALUATION OF THE STATE OF
A. Introduction and methodology
B. Evaluation of the state of freedom of expression in the Member States
1. Argentina
2. Bahamas
3. Belize
4. Bolivia
5. Brazil
6. Canada
7. Chile
8. Colombia
9. Costa Rica
10. Cuba
11. Ecuador
12. El Salvador
13. United States
14. Guatemala
15. Guyana
16. Haiti
17. Honduras
18. Jamaica
19. Nicaragua
20. Panama
21. Paraguay
22. Peru
23. Dominican Republic
24. Suriname
25. Trinidad y Tobago
26. Uruguay
27. Venezuela
28. Mexico: 2010 Special Report on Freedom of Expression in Mexico
29. Proposed Categories and Standards for the Special Country Reports of the Office of the Special Rapporteur for Freedom of Expression of the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights
CHAPTER III ACCESS TO INFORMATION ON HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS
The right of the victims of human rights violations to access information in state archives on such violations
1. Do the victims of serious human rights violations or their relatives have the right to access information on such violations when it is in the archives of State security forces?
2. The positive obligations of the State in relation to access to information on mass human rights violations
3. The obligation to adapt States’ normative framework to international obligations
4. The Court’s judgment in the case of Gomes Lund et al (Guerrilha do Araguaia) v. Brazil and the right of access to information
CHAPTER IV JUDICIAL BEST PRACTICE WITH RESPECT TO ACCESS TO INFORMATION
IN THE
A. Introduction
B. Judicial best practice with respect to human rights
C. National Decisions that Constitute Judicial Best Practice with respect to Access to Information
1. Case law on the nature and scope of the right of access to information as a fundamental autonomous right
2. Case law on universal entitlement to the right of access to information
3. Case law on the principle of maximum disclosure
4. Case law on the application of the principle of maximum disclosure to order access to information on government advertising
5. Case law on access to information regarding the funding of political parties
6. Case law on the right to know salaries or incomes paid from public funds
7. Case law on the publicity of statistical data
8. Case law on access to personal information on the beneficiaries of social programs
9. Case law on the principle of maximum disclosure as a guarantee of participation and citizen oversight in a democratic State
10. Principle of maximum disclosure as a limit to banking and stock exchange secrecy when public funds are involved
11. Case law on the obligation to have a simple, prompt, and free administrative procedure for access to information
12. Case law on access to information and the duty to create and maintain archives
13. Case law on the State’s duty to justify any denial of a request for access to information
14. Case law on the right of access in the event of a request for information that is especially burdensome to the State
15. Case law on access to personal information: definition of "personal information"
16. Case law on access to public records and archives containing the requester’s information
17. Case law on the right of access to information on individuals who are or have been government employees
18. Case law on restrictions to the right of access to information: general system of limitations to the right of access to information
19. Case law on the requirements that limitations be set forth by law
20. Case law on the requirement that the confidentiality of information be set for limited and reasonable periods of time
21. Case law on proof of harm and the need to perform a strict proportionality test when the confidentiality of information is invoked
22. Case law on the restrictive application of the concept of national security
23. Case law on access to information contained in documents directly related to the commission of violations of human rights and international humanitarian law.
CHAPTER V PRINCIPLES ON THE REGULATION OF GOVERNMENT ADVERTISING IN THE INTER-AMERICAN SYSTEM FOR THE PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS
A. The case of government advertising
B. Guiding principles on government advertising
1. Establishment of specific, clear, and precise laws
2. Legitimate objectives of government advertising
3. Criteria for the allocation of government advertising
4. Adequate planning
5. Contracting mechanisms
6. Transparency and access to information
7. External oversight of the allocation of government advertising
8. Media pluralism and government advertising
CHAPTER VI CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
APPENDIX