|
63rd
REGULAR SESSION
August
4-29, 2003
Rio de
Janeiro, Brazil |
OEA/Ser.Q
CJI/RES.59 (LXIII-O/03)
13 August
2003
Original:
English |
CJI/RES.59 (LXIII-O/03)
THE APPLICABLE LAW AND COMPETENCY OF INTERNATIONAL
JURISDICTION WITH RESPECT TO EXTRACONTRACTUAL CIVIL
LIABILITY
(presented by Dr. Carlos Manuel Vázquez and Ana Elizabeth
Villalta Vizcarra)
THE INTER-AMERICAN JURIDICAL COMMITTEE,
RECALLING that, in resolution CP/RES. 815 (1318/02), the
Permanent Council instructed the Inter-American Juridical
Committee “to examine the documentation on the topic
regarding the applicable law and competency of international
jurisdiction with respect to extracontractual civil
liability, and to issue a report on the subject, drawing up
recommendations and possible solutions, all of which are to
be presented to the Permanent Council as soon as
practicable, for its consideration and determination of
future steps;”
BEARING IN MIND that CIDIP-VI/RES.7/02, which the Permanent
Council instructed the Inter-American Juridical Committee to
treat as a guideline, contemplated a “preliminary study”, to
be submitted to a Meeting of Experts, identifying specific
areas revealing progressive development of regulation in
this field through conflict of law solutions, as well as a
comparative analysis of national norms currently in effect;”
RECALLING that at its 62nd regular session, the
Inter-American Juridical Committee concluded, on the basis
of studies by rapporteurs Drs. Ana Elizabeth Villalta
Vizcarra and Carlos Manuel Vázquez, that “because of the
complexity of the subject and the wide variety of diverging
forms of responsibility encompassed within the category of
‘non-contractual civil liability,’ it would be more
appropriate to recommend initially the adoption of
inter-American instruments to regulate jurisdiction and
choice of law with respect to specific sub-categories of
non-contractual civil liability, and only afterwards, should
the proper conditions exist, pursue the adoption of a
general inter-American instrument to address jurisdiction
and choice of law for the entire field of non-contractual
liability” (CJI/RES.55 (lxii-o/03));
HAVING BENEFITTED from a thorough discussion of this subject
at its current regular session,
RESOLVES:
1. To welcome the additional studies presented by the co-rapporteurs,
Dr. Ana Elizabeth Villalta Vizcarra (Applicable Law and
Competency of International Jujrisdiction with Respect to
Extracontractual Civil Liability, CJI/doc.130/03) and Dr.
Carlos Manuel Vázquez (Jurisdiction And Choice Of Law For
Non-Contractual Obligations – Part II: Specific Types Of
Non-Contractual Liability Potentially Suitable For Treatment
In An Inter-American Private International Law Instrument,
CJI/doc.133/03).
2. To reaffirm its conclusion that, because of the
complexity of the subject and the wide variety of diverging
forms of responsibility encompassed within the category of
“non-contractual civil liability,” it would be more
appropriate to recommend initially the adoption of
inter-American instruments to regulate jurisdiction and
choice of law with respect to specific sub-categories of
non-contractual civil liability, and only afterwards, should
the proper conditions exist, pursue the adoption of a
general inter-American instrument to address jurisdiction
and choice of law for the entire field of non-contractual
liability.
3. To conclude that:
(a) favorable conditions currently exist for the elaboration
of an Inter-American instrument addressing jurisdiction and
applicable law with respect to non-contractual obligations
arising out of traffic accidents.
(b) favorable conditions currently exist for the elaboration
of an Inter-American instrument addressing jurisdiction and
applicable law with respect to non-contractual liability of
manufacturers and others for defective products (product
liability), although the elaboration of such an instrument
would be more challenging than the elaboration of an
instrument addressing jurisdiction and choice of law for
non-contractual obligations arising out of traffic
accidents.
(c) the elaboration of an inter-American instrument
addressing jurisdiction and choice of law with respect to
non-contractual liability arising out of transboundary
environmental damage would be considerably more challenging
than the elaboration of an instrument addressing
jurisdiction and applicable law for non-contractual
obligations arising out of traffic accidents and for
non-contractual liability of manufacturers and others for
defective products (product liability).
(d) favorable conditions do not currently exist for the
elaboration of an inter-American instrument addressing
jurisdiction and applicable law with respect to
non-contractual liability resulting from acts occurring in
cyberspace.
4. To transmit to the Permanent Council, along with this
resolution, the reports presented to the Committee by the
rapporteurs on this topic at the 61st, 62nd and 63rd regular
sessions, and to recommend that this resolution and the
accompanying reports be made available, as contemplated by
CIDIP-VI/RES.7/02, to the Meetings of Experts that may be
convened to study possible topics to be included in the
agenda of CIDIP-VII.
5. To convey to the Permanent Council its continuing desire
to support the work of the Organization relating to the
harmonization and development of private international law
in the Hemisphere as the Permanent Council may request.
This resolution was unanimously adopted at the session held
on 12 August 2003, in the presence of the following members:
Drs. João Grandino Rodas, Brynmor Thornton Pollard, Antonio
Gómez-Robledo, Ana Elizabeth Villalta Vizcarra, Jonathan T.
Fried, Carlos Manuel Vázquez, Luis Herrera Marcano and
Felipe Paolillo.
Annexes:
1. CJI/doc.97/02 – Recommendations and Possible Solutions
Proposed to the Topic Related to the Law Applicable to
International Jurisdictional Competence with Regard to
Extracontractual Civil Responsibility.
2. CJI/doc.104/02 Rev.2 - The Desirability of Pursuing the
Negotiation of an Inter-American Instrument on Choice of Law
and Competency of International Jurisdiction with Respect to
Non-Contractual Civil Liability: A Framework for Analysis
and Agenda for Research.
3. CJI/doc.105 -
4. CJI/doc.119/03 - The Applicable Law and Competency of
International Jurisdiction in Relation to Extra-Contractual
Civil Liability.
5. CJI/doc.122/03 Corr.1 - Hemispheric Approaches to
Jurisdiction and Applicable Law for Non-Contractual Civil
Liability.
6. CJI/doc.130/03 - Applicable Law and Competence of
International Jurisdiction Concerning Non-Contractual Civil
Liability.
7. CJI/doc.133/03 – Jurisdiction and Choice of Law for
Non-Contractual Obligations – Part II:
Specific Types of Non-Contractual Liability Potentially
Suitable for Treatment in an Inter-American Private
International Law Instrument. |