I. BACKGROUND
At
the first plenary session of the Sixth Inter-American
Specialized Conference on Private International Law (CIDIP-VI), held on February 4, 2002, Committee I was
assigned Topic I of the agenda: “Standardized
commercial documentation for international transportation,
with special reference to the 1989 Inter-American Convention
on Contracts for the International Carriage of Goods
by Road, with the possible incorporation of an additional
protocol on bills of lading.”
The
Committee began its first meeting on February 4, 2002,
with the delegate of Bolivia serving as Provisional
Chair, as his delegation was first in the order of precedence.
The delegation of Canada nominated the delegate of the
United States, Mary Helen Carlson, to serve as Committee
Chair. The delegation of Brazil seconded the nomination,
and the Chair was elected by acclamation.
The
Committee decided that the Vice Chair of the Committee
should be held by the delegations according to their
order of precedence at the Conference. The delegation
of the United States nominated the delegate of Uruguay,
Cecilia Fresnedo, to serve as Rapporteur. She
was elected by acclamation.
II.
WORKING PAPERS
In
its working meetings, the Committee considered document
CIDIP-VI/doc.5/02 rev. 1, prepared by the delegation
of the United States, which had chaired the Working
Group established on this topic at the Meeting of Experts
on February 14-18, 2000, at OAS headquarters in Washington,
D.C. This version of the draft Inter-American
Uniform Through Bill of Lading for the International
Carriage of Goods by Road was the one that the delegations
used as the basic working paper for discussion of the
topic. The Committee also considered documents
CIDIP-VI/doc.12/02, “Draft Inter-American Uniform Through
Bill of Lading for the International Carriage of Goods
by Road–Terms and Conditions”; CIDIP-VI/doc.13/02, “Draft
General Terms and Conditions for the Inter-American
Uniform Through Bill of Lading for the International
Carriage of Goods by Road”; and CIDIP-VI/doc.14/02,
“Statement of Reasons for the Draft Inter-American Through
Bill of Lading for the International Carriage of Goods
by Road.” All three documents were presented by
the delegation of Uruguay.
III.
PROCEDURE
At
the start of the Committee’s first meeting, the Chair
proposed that the Committee’s consideration of this
topic begin with introduction of document CIDIP-VI/doc.5/02
rev. 1, by Mr. Ken Hoffman, an expert on the subject
and a member of the United States delegation.
She proposed that the Committee could then proceed to
an article-by-article examination of the Draft Inter-American
Uniform Through Bill of Lading for the International
Carriage of Goods by Road. These proposals were
agreed to by the Committee.
When
the United States delegate completed his presentation
of the document, the Uruguayan delegation requested
the floor to make a number of general observations on
some aspects of the topic under consideration.
After this the Chair declared the Committee’s first
meeting adjourned.
IV.
ANALYSIS OF THE TOPIC - SUMMARY OF THE WORK
During the meetings that followed, the Committee continued
its discussion of the draft. The delegate of Brazil
proposed that a Working Group be formed to consider
the law applicable to liability resulting from the international
carriage of goods by road. He proposed that, while
the group should be open to all delegations, it was
important that delegates from member states representative
of different legal traditions participate in its work.
The Committee agreed to the proposal and the Chair asked
the delegate of Brazil, Mr. Guido Fernando Silva
Soares,
to chair the Group. The delegation of Uruguay
seconded the Chair’s proposal, whereupon the Chair of
the Working Group was elected by acclamation.
The
Committee continued its article-by-article examination
of the Draft Inter-American Uniform Through Bill of
Lading for the International Carriage of Goods by Road
(document CIDIP-VI/doc.5/02 rev. 1). The delegations
of the United States, Uruguay, Brazil, the Dominican
Republic, Peru, Colombia, Canada, Guyana, and Mexico
took the floor to make observations during the discussion
of this document. The Chair also recognized Mr.
François Rouette, a Canadian attorney, accredited at
the Conference as a special guest.
The
delegations had a number of observations on the draft,
particularly centering on analysis of the questions
of the applicable law, jurisdiction, liability regime,
the negotiable or non-negotiable nature of the Bill
of Lading, and the scope of application. On the
last point, there was lengthy discussion of whether
the scope of application of the bill of lading under
consideration was restricted to road transport or covered
multimodal transport. The Committee requested
that those issues also be examined in the working group
already established. The Chair informed the Committee
that in addition to the meetings already scheduled for
the Conference, an informal meeting would be held on
Thursday morning, February 7. She also told the
Committee that it would meet formally that afternoon
to review the proposals and agreements already decided.
At
the meeting held on Thursday, February 7, 2002, the
Chair of the Working Group informed the Committee that
the Working Group had arrived at an agreement whereby
two draft bills of lading–one non-negotiable and the
other negotiable–would be presented to the Committee
to consider and would eventually be recommended to the
plenary for approval. The Chair said that that
the interests expressed by different delegations would
therefore be taken into account. The Chair indicated
that one was a draft presented by the delegation of
the United States and the other a draft presented by
the delegation of Uruguay, and that both proponents
had consulted with the other members of the Working
Group regarding the content of the drafts.
The
Chair invited the Committee to consider the two drafts
and asked the proponents to make their respective introductions.
The delegations made comments and sought clarification,
and the Committee adopted both drafts by consensus.
The
delegation of Mexico suggested that the Committee include
a recommendation in the draft resolution to be presented
to the plenary of the Conference to the effect that
the member states of the OAS should consider signing
or ratifying, as appropriate, the Inter-American Convention
on the Law Applicable to International Contracts.
The delegations of the United States, Canada, Brazil,
and Uruguay requested the floor to comment on the suggestion.
The Chair observed that the Committee did not appear
to be prepared to approve the recommendation by consensus,
and asked the delegation of Mexico to consider making
its proposal to the plenary directly, in order to allow
the Committee to continue to work on the topics assigned
to it.
The
Chair then introduced the draft resolution that the
Committee would present to the plenary. The delegations
made some comments and adopted the draft by consensus.
The
Chair thanked the delegations for their work, and the
delegate of Brazil, speaking on behalf of the delegations
on the Committee, thanked and congratulated the Chair
for her work. The Chair expressed thanks to the
General Secretariat for the services provided and noted
that the Committee had completed its work.