1.
Background
The Sixth Inter-American Specialized Conference on
Private International Law (CIDIP-VI) was convoked by
the General Assembly of the Organization of American
States at its twenty-sixth regular session, through
resolution AG/RES. 1393 (XXVI-O/96).
In that resolution, the General Assembly instructed
the Permanent Council of the Organization to approve
the rules of procedure and agenda for the Sixth
Inter-American Specialized Conference on Private
International Law, to be presented to the governments
of the Member States for approval.
As it had for earlier specialized
conferences, the General Assembly also entrusted the
General Secretariat to prepare the technical documents
and information necessary to facilitate preparations
for the Conference, and to carry out all necessary
activities related to the preparatory phase of
CIDIP-VI.
In 1997, the General Assembly, through resolution
AG/RES. 1472 (XXVII-O/97), urged the Permanent Council
to continue its study of the agenda items for
CIDIP-VI, and urged Member States to provide their
comments and observations on the draft agenda.
The draft agenda for CIDIP-VI was adopted by
the General Assembly at its twenty-eighth regular
session, through resolution AG/RES. 1558
(XXVIII-O/98), in which the General Assembly also
instructed the Permanent Council to convene a meeting
of experts designated by Member States to define the
scope of the agenda items and to begin the preparatory
work for CIDIP-VI.
On October 21, 1998, the Permanent Council through
resolution CP/RES. 732 (1173/98) convened a Meeting of
Experts on CIDIP-VI.
The results of that meeting, held in December
1998, were published as document RE/CIDIP-VI/doc.9/98.
In accordance with the mandate from the General
Assembly, the Permanent Council, through resolution
CP/RES. 744 (1185/99), approved the draft agenda for
CIDIP-VI.
In its first plenary session held on February
4, 2002, the Conference adopted its agenda, unchanged
from that proposed by the Permanent Council and
approved by the General Assembly [AG/RES. 1613
(XXIX-O/99)]:
I.
Standardized commercial documentation for
international transportation, with special reference
to the 1989 Inter-American Convention on Contracts for
the International Carriage of Goods by Road, with the
possible incorporation of an additional protocol on
bills of lading.
II.
International loan contracts of a private nature, in
particular, the uniformity and harmonization of
secured transactions law.
III.
Conflict of laws on extracontractual liability, with
an emphasis on competency of jurisdiction and
applicable law with respect to civil international
liability for transboundary pollution.
Work on these topics was begun by three working groups
established at the Meeting of Experts convened at OAS
headquarters in Washington D.C., from February 14-18,
2000, pursuant to the provisions of AG/RES. 1613
(XXIX-O/99) and CP/RES. 744 (1185/99).
Chairs of each of these working groups were
named at the Meeting of Experts, the report of which
was published as REG/CIDIP-VI/doc.6/00 corr. 2.
The U.S. Chair of the working group for Topic I
prepared the draft ,
CIDIP-VI/doc.5/02.
The co-chairs of the working group for Topic
II, the U.S. and Mexico, prepared the draft Model
Inter-American Law on Secured Transactions,
CIDIP-VI/doc.4/02.
The Chair of the working group for Topic III,
Uruguay, prepared the draft Inter-American Convention
On Applicable Law and Proper International
Jurisdiction In Matters Of Civil Liability For
Cross-Border Pollution, CIDIP-VI/doc.8/02.
The General Secretariat, through its Secretariat for Legal Affairs (SLA), prepared the technical and informative
documents and provided Secretariat services to the
Conference, as well as the CIDIP background document,
CIDIP-VI/doc.11/02.
The Permanent Council assigned its Committee on
Juridical and Political Affairs the work of preparing
and coordinating the documents to be used in CIDIP-VI.
The Inter-American Juridical Committee prepared a
report on “CIDIP-VII and Beyond,” CIDIP-VI/doc.10/02,
based on responses to a questionnaire it circulated to
a broad range of academics, jurists, and legal experts
from throughout the Americas.
Document CIDIP-VI/doc.19/02 rev. 2 contains a list of
accredited delegations and other participants in the
Conference.
2.
Secretariat of the Conference
The General Secretariat was represented by Dr. Enrique
Lagos, Assistant Secretary for Legal Affairs. The
Technical Secretariat was headed by Dr. Jean-Michel
Arrighi, Director of the Department of International
Law of the Secretariat for Legal Affairs (SLA) of the OAS.
The General Secretariat appointed Ms. Linda Poole as
the Coordinator of Conference Services and Dr.
Reinaldo Rodríguez as Secretary of the Plenary.
3.
Sessions and Organization of the Conference
a.
Inaugural session
The inaugural session was held on February 4, 2002, at
9:30 a.m. and was presided over by the Conference’s
Interim Chair, Ambassador Raúl Ricardes, Chair of the
Committee on Juridical and Political Affairs.
Addresses were given by Ambassador Luigi
Einaudi, Assistant Secretary General of the OAS, and
by Ambassador Raúl Ricardes, Permanent Mission of
Argentina to the OAS, Chair of the Committee on
Juridical and Political Affairs.
b.
First plenary session
The first plenary session of the Conference was held
on February 4 at 11:00 a.m. and was presided over by
the Conference’s Interim Chair, Ambassador Raúl
Ricardes, Permanent Mission of Argentina to the OAS,
Chair of the Committee on Juridical and Political
Affairs.
In accordance with Article 16 of the draft Rules of
Procedure of the Conference, the plenary adopted
decisions on the following matters:
election of the Chair, agenda, rules of
procedure, working committees, the deadline by which
delegations were to present amendments to or
substitute wording for the draft instruments, and the
approximate duration of the Conference.
i.
Chair of the Conference
His
Excellency Ambassador Didier Opertti, Minister of
Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Uruguay and Head of
Delegation, was elected Chair of the Conference by
acclamation.
It was resolved, in accordance with Article
13 of the Rules of Procedure, that the heads of
delegation in attendance would act as vice chairs of
the Conference in the order of precedence established
by the Permanent Council at its meeting on November 7,
2001.
ii.
Rules of Procedure
The Conference approved, without amendment, the draft
Rules of Procedure adopted by the Permanent Council in
resolution CP/RES. 800 (1299/01) and published as
document CIDIP-VI/doc.6/02.
iii.
Organization of the Committees
In accordance with Article 41 of the Rules of
Procedure, the Conference, in its first plenary
session, decided to organize three working committees,
designated as Committee I, Committee II, and Committee
III. The Committee I was assigned Topic I:
Standardized commercial documentation for
international transportation, with special reference
to the 1989 Inter-American Convention on Contracts for
the International Carriage of Goods by Road, with the
possible incorporation of an additional protocol on
bills of lading. The Committee II was assigned Topic
II:
International loan contracts of a private
nature, in particular, the uniformity and
harmonization of secured transactions law.
Committee III was assigned Topic III:
Conflict of laws on extracontractual
liability, with an emphasis on competency of
jurisdiction and applicable law with respect to civil
international liability for transboundary pollution.
iv.
Deadline for submitting proposals and
amendments
The Conference agreed to set Wednesday, February 6, at
5:00 p.m. as the deadline for the delegations to
submit proposals, amendments, draft resolutions, and
all other documents relating to the business of the
Conference.
v.
Duration of the Conference
It was agreed that the Conference would have a
duration of five working days and would conclude on
Friday, February 8, 2002.
c.
Officers of the Working Committees
The following officers for the working committees were
elected:
Committee I |
Chair |
Mary Helen Carlson |
United States |
Vice Chair |
Heads of Delegation |
By order of precedence |
Rapporteur |
Cecilia Fresnedo |
Uruguay |
Technical Secretariat |
Sergio Biondo |
|
|
Timothy Rudy |
|
Committee II |
Chair
|
José Luis Siqueiros Prieto |
Mexico
|
Vice Chair |
Boris Kozolchyk |
United States
|
Rapporteur
|
Ronald Herbert |
Uruguay
|
Technical Secretariat |
Kathleen Lannan |
|
|
Elizabeth García |
|
Committee III |
Chair
|
Juan Manuel Castulovich
|
Panama
|
Vice Chair |
Berta Feder |
Uruguay
|
Rapporteur
|
Rafael Veintimilla Chiriboga |
Ecuador
|
Technical Secretariat |
Luis Toro |
|
|
Gerónimo Frigerio |
|
d.
Second plenary session
The Conference held its second plenary session on
February 7, 2002.
The session was convened to study the present
and the future of the Inter-American Specialized
Conferences on Private International Law (CIDIPs).
In addition to the special guests and permanent
observers, the session was attended by members of the
Inter-American Juridical Committee (CJI).
The following reference documents were made
available to the session:
CIDIP-VII and Beyond (CIDIP-VI/doc.10/02),
submitted by the CJI; The History of the CIDIP Process
(CIDIP-VI/doc 11/01), submitted by the Secretariat for Legal Affairs (SLA); and The Present and Future of CIDIP
(CIDIP-VI/doc.18/02), submitted by Diego P. Fernández
Arroyo, a special guest of the OAS.
The delegations’ comments will be transcribed in the
minutes of the session.
e.
Third plenary session
The third plenary session was held on February 8, 2002. The session heard the reports submitted by the rapporteurs of
the working committees and adopted the Final Act and the
corresponding resolutions.
The delegations’ comments will be transcribed
in the minutes of the session.
f.
Closing session
The closing session was held on Friday, February 8,
2002, at 5:00 p.m.
The Chair of the Conference, His Excellency
Ambassador Didier Opertti, Minister of Foreign Affairs
of Uruguay, invited the Member State delegations
accredited to participate in CIDIP-VI to sign the Final
Act.
The
Chair of the Conference then made a few remarks, saying
how pleased he was at the success of the Conference,
which adopted a model law and a uniform document in
private international law.
He summarized the work accomplished by the
Conference and highlighted the significance of the
agreements concluded.
Following his remarks, he officially declared
the Sixth Inter-American Specialized Conference on
Private International Law adjourned. |