CONTENTS

Page

AG/DEC. 20 (XXIX-O/99) Support for Paraguayan Democracy and for the Strengthening and Normalization of its Institutions.......................................................................... 1

AG/DEC. 21 (XXIX-O/99) Declaration on the Question of the Malvinas Islands...................... 3

AG/DEC. 22 (XXIX-O/99) Support for the Peace Process in Colombia................................... 5

AG/RES. 1607 (XXIX-O/99) Inter-American Convention on Transparency in Conventional Weapons Acquisitions................................................................................ 7

AG/RES. 1608 (XXIX-O/99) Inter-American Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Persons with Disabilities................................................. 23

AG/RES. 1609 (XXIX-O/99) Inter-American Declaration on Freedom of Expression................ 31

AG/RES. 1610 (XXIX-O/99) Proposed American Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Populations 33

AG/RES. 1611 (XXIX-O/99) The Human Rights of All Migrant Workers and Their Families..... 35

AG/RES. 1612 (XXIX-O/99) Meeting of Government Representatives on Electoral Campaign Contributions................................................................................................ 37

AG/RES. 1613 (XXIX-O/99) Sixth Inter-American Specialized Conference on Private International Law (CIDIP-VI)............................................................................... 39

AG/RES. 1614 (XXIX-O/99) Free Trade and Investment in the Hemisphere............................. 41

AG/RES. 1615 (XXIX-O/99) Meeting of Ministers of Justice or of Ministers or Attorneys General of the Americas.................................................................................. 43

AG/RES. 1616 (XXIX-O/99) Annual Report of the Inter-American Juridical Committee............ 45

AG/RES. 1617 (XXIX-O/99) Inter-American Program for the Development of International Law 49

AG/RES. 1618 (XXIX-O/99) Legal Development of Integration............................................... 51

AG/RES. 1619 (XXIX-O/99) Promotion of and Respect for International Humanitarian Law..... 53

Page

AG/RES. 1620 (XXIX-O/99) Program of Education for Peace in the Hemisphere..................... 57

AG/RES. 1621 (XXIX-O/99) Inter-American Convention against the Illicit Manufacturing of and Trafficking in Firearms, Ammunition, Explosives, and Other Related Materials... 59

AG/RES. 1622 (XXIX-O/99) Consolidation of the Regime Established in the Treaty for the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons in Latin America and the Caribbean (Treaty of Tlatelolco)................................................................................................ 61

AG/RES. 1623 (XXIX-O/99) Confidence- and Security-Building in the Americas...................... 63

AG/RES. 1624 (XXIX-O/99) Inter-American Support for the Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production, Stockpiling and Use of Chemical Weapons and on Their Destruction................................................................................................ 67

AG/RES. 1625 (XXIX-O/99) Status of Women in the Americas and Strengthening and Modernization of the Inter-American Commission of Women...................................... 69

AG/RES. 1626 (XXIX-O/99) First Biennial Report on Compliance with Resolution AG/RES. 1456 (Xxvii-O/97), “Promotion of the Inter-American Convention on the Prevention, Punishment, and Eradication of Violence against Women ‘Convention of Belém Do Pará’”................................................................................. 73

AG/RES. 1627 (XXIX-O/99) Appointment of Women to Senior Management Positions at the OAS 75

AG/RES. 1628 (XXIX-O/99) Fellowship and Training Programs.............................................. 77

AG/RES. 1629 (XXIX-O/99) Cooperation between the General Secretariat of the Organization of American States and the General Secretariat of the Central American Integration System................................................................................................ 79

AG/RES. 1630 (XXIX-O/99) Study on the Scale of Quota Assessments................................... 81

AG/RES. 1631 (XXIX-O/99) Quota Payments........................................................................ 83

AG/RES. 1632 (XXIX-O/99) Strengthening of National Systems and International Cooperation in the Area of International Adoptions.............................................................. 85

Page

AG/RES. 1633 (XXIX-O/99) Evaluation of the Workings of the Inter-American System for the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights with a view to Its Strengthening and Improvement................................................................................................ 91

AG/RES. 1634 (XXIX-O/99) Procedures for Preparing and Adopting Inter-American Legal Instruments within the Organization of American States........................................... 93

AG/RES. 1635 (XXIX-O/99) American Declaration of the Rights and Duties of Man................ 97

AG/RES. 1636 (XXIX-O/99) Inter-American Program of Culture............................................ 99

AG/RES. 1637 (XXIX-O/99) Permanent Specific Fund to Finance Activities Related to OAS Electoral Observation Missions............................................................... 101

AG/RES. 1638 (XXIX-O/99) The Panama Canal.................................................................. 105

AG/RES. 1639 (XXIX-O/99) Cooperation between the Organization of American States and the United Nations System.................................................................................... 107

AG/RES. 1640 (XXIX-O/99) Special Security Concerns of Small Island States....................... 109

AG/RES. 1641 (XXIX-O/99) Support for the Mine-Clearing Program in Central America........ 113

AG/RES. 1642 (XXIX-O/99) Proliferation of and Illicit Trafficking in Small Arms and Light Weapons 117

AG/RES. 1643 (XXIX-O/99) Work Program of the Committee on Hemispheric Security in Preparation for the Special Conference on Security................................................ 121

AG/RES. 1644 (XXIX-O/99) The Western Hemisphere as an Antipersonnel-Land-Mine-Free Zone 123

AG/RES. 1645 (XXIX-O/99) Support for the Committee on Hemispheric Security................... 129

AG/RES. 1646 (XXIX-O/99) Report of the Board of External Auditors.................................. 133

AG/RES. 1647 (XXIX-O/99) Personnel Policy Reform.......................................................... 135

AG/RES. 1648 (XXIX-O/99) Promotion of Representative Democracy.................................. 137

Page

AG/RES. 1649 (XXIX-O/99) Enhancement of Probity in the Hemisphere and Follow-up on the Inter-American Program for Cooperation in the Fight against Corruption............. 141

AG/RES. 1650 (XXIX-O/99) Hemispheric Cooperation to Prevent, Combat, and Eliminate Terrorism 145

AG/RES. 1651 (XXIX-O/99) The Prevention of and War on Crime........................................ 157

AG/RES. 1652 (XXIX-O/99) Observations and Recommendations on the Annual Report of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights............................................................ 159

AG/RES. 1653 (XXIX-O/99) Plan of Action of the General Secretariat to extend the Special Fellowships for the Caribbean Program to Other States........................................... 161

AG/RES. 1654 (XXIX-O/99) Annual Report of the Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission (CICAD)............................................................................................... 163

AG/RES. 1655 (XXIX-O/99) Technical Analysis by the Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission (CICAD) on the Study of the Advisability of Preparing a Draft Inter-American Convention to Combat Money Laundering................................. 165

AG/RES. 1656 (XXIX-O/99) Amendments to the Model Regulations Concerning Laundering Offences Connected to Illicit Drug Trafficking and Related Offences of the Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission.............................................. 167

AG/RES. 1657 (XXIX-O/99) Recommendations to promote Alternative Development Programs in the Member States of CICAD..................................................................... 169

AG/RES. 1658 (XXIX-O/99) Amendments to the Model Regulations to Control Chemical Precursors and Chemical Substances, Machines, and Materials of the Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission....................................................... 171

AG/RES. 1659 (XXIX-O/99) Support for and Follow-up to the Summits of the Americas Initiatives...... 173

AG/RES. 1660 (XXIX-O/99) Observations and Recommendations on the Annual Report of the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights.................................................. 177

Page

AG/RES. 1661 (XXIX-O/99) The Organization of American States and Civil Society.............. 181

AG/RES. 1662 (XXIX-O/99) Consideration of the Situation of the Permanent Observers and Their Participation in the Cooperation Activities and Programs of the Organization... 183

AG/RES. 1663 (XXIX-O/99) Inter-American Program for the Promotion of Human Rights..... 185

AG/RES. 1664 (XXIX-O/99) Celebration of the 30th Anniversary of the American Convention on Human Rights (Pact of San José, Costa Rica) and the 20th Anniversary of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights............................................. 219

AG/RES. 1665 (XXIX-O/99) Support for the Work of the Inter-American Institute of Human Rights 221

AG/RES. 1666 (XXIX-O/99) Creation of the Committee to Coordinate Cooperation Programs of the Inter-American System.................................................................... 223

AG/RES. 1667 (XXIX-O/99) Inclusion of Children’s Issues on the Hemispheric Agenda......... 225

AG/RES. 1668 (XXIX-O/99) Strengthening Cooperation between Governments and Civil Society 227

AG/RES. 1669 (XXIX-O/99) Observations and Recommendations on the Annual Reports of the Organs, Agencies, and Entities of the Organization................................. 229

AG/RES. 1670 (XXIX-O/99) Support for the Work of Defenders of the People, Defenders of the Population, Human Rights Attorneys, and Human Rights Commissioners (Ombudsmen) in the Context of Strengthening Democracy in the Hemisphere............ 231

AG/RES. 1671 (XXIX-O/99) “Human Rights Defenders in the Americas”

Support for the Individuals, Groups, and Organizations of Civil Society Working to Promote and Protect Human Rights in the Americas.................. 233

AG/RES. 1672 (XXIX-O/99) Special Program of Support for Guatemala................................ 235

AG/RES. 1673 (XXIX-O/99) Parliamentary Network of the Americas................................... 237

Page

AG/RES. 1674 (XXIX-O/99) Climate Change in the Americas............................................... 239

AG/RES. 1675 (XXIX-O/99) Cooperation between the General Secretariat of the Organization of American States and the General Secretariat of the Caribbean Community. 241

AG/RES. 1676 (XXIX-O/99) Special Program of Support to Countries Affected by “El Niño”. 243

AG/RES. 1677 (XXIX-O/99) Annual Report of the Inter-American Council for Integral Development 245

AG/RES. 1678 (XXIX-O/99) Mechanisms for Implementing the Inter-American Dialogue on Partnership for Development........................................................................... 247

AG/RES. 1679 (XXIX-O/99) Inter-American Program of Education....................................... 253

AG/RES. 1680 (XXIX-O/99) Inter-American Science and Technology Program..................... 255

AG/RES. 1681 (XXIX-O/99) Specialized Conferences........................................................... 257

AG/RES. 1682 (XXIX-O/99) OAS Natural Disaster Reduction and Response Mechanisms..... 259

AG/RES. 1683 (XXIX-O/99) Congratulations to Ecuador and Peru on Signing the Peace Agreements 263

AG/RES. 1684 (XXIX-O/99) Participatory Democracy.......................................................... 265

AG/RES. 1685 (XXIX-O/99) Modernization of the OAS and Renewal of the Inter-American System 267

AG/RES. 1686 (XXIX-O/99) Inter-American Agency for Cooperation and Development......... 269

AG/RES. 1687 (XXIX-O/99) Place and Date of the Thirty-third Regular Session of the General Assembly............................................................................................... 271

AG/RES. 1688 (XXIX-O/99) Venue and Date of the Thirty-fourth Regular Session of the General Assembly............................................................................................... 273

AG/RES. 1689 (XXIX-O/99) Trade and Integration in the Americas....................................... 275

Page

AG/RES. 1690 (XXIX-O/99) The Museum of the Americas and OAS Conference Facilities.... 279

AG/RES. 1691 (XXIX-O/99) International Abduction of Minors by One of Their Parents........ 281

AG/RES. 1692 (XXIX-O/99) The Financial and Budgetary Situation of the Organization.......... 283

AG/RES. 1693 (XXIX-O/99) The Situation of Refugees and Returnees in the Americas.......... 285

AG/RES. 1694 (XXIX-O/99) Dividends for Peace................................................................. 287

AG/RES. 1695 (XXIX-O/99) World Conference against Racism, Racial Discrimination, Xenophobia, and Related Intolerance.................................................................. 289

AG/RES. 1696 (XXIX-O/99) Strengthening Representative Democracy................................. 291

AG/RES. 1697 (XXIX-O/99) The Program-Budget of the Organization for 2000 Quotas and Contributions to the Voluntary Fund for 2000........................................................... 293

AG/RES. 1608 (XXIX-O/99)

INTER-AMERICAN CONVENTION ON THE ELIMINATION OF ALL FORMS OF DISCRIMINATION AGAINST PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES

(Resolution adopted at the first plenary session,

held on June 7, 1999)

THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY,

HAVING SEEN the report of the Permanent Council on the draft Inter-American Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Persons with Disabilities (CP/CAJP-1532/99);

CONSIDERING that, during its twenty-sixth regular session, the General Assembly, in resolution AG/RES. 1369 (XXVI-O/96), “Panama Commitment to Persons with Disabilities in the American Hemisphere,” instructed the Permanent Council to prepare, through the appropriate working group, a “draft Inter-American Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination by Reason of Disability”;

BEARING IN MIND that disability can lead to situations of discrimination, and that it is necessary therefore to encourage actions and measures to bring about a substantial improvement in the situation of persons with disabilities in the Hemisphere;

RECALLING that the American Declaration of the Rights and Duties of Man proclaims that all human beings are born free and equal, in dignity and in rights, and that the rights and freedoms of every person must be respected without distinction of any kind;

TAKING INTO CONSIDERATION that the Additional Protocol to the American Convention on Human Rights in the area of Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights, or “Protocol of San Salvador,” recognizes that “everyone affected by a diminution of his physical or mental capacities is entitled to receive special attention designed to help him achieve the greatest possible development of his personality”; and

NOTING that resolution AG/RES. 1564 (XXVIII-O/98) reiterates “the importance of adopting an Inter-American Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Persons with Disabilities” and, in addition, requests that every necessary effort be made to ensure that this legal instrument is adopted and signed at the twenty-ninth regular session of the General Assembly,

RESOLVES:

To adopt the following Inter-American Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Persons with Disabilities:

INTER-AMERICAN CONVENTION ON THE ELIMINATION OF ALL FORMS

OF DISCRIMINATION AGAINST PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES

THE STATES PARTIES TO THIS CONVENTION,

REAFFIRMING that persons with disabilities have the same human rights and fundamental freedoms as other persons; and that these rights, which include freedom from discrimination based on disability, flow from the inherent dignity and equality of each person;

CONSIDERING that the Charter of the Organization of American States, in Article 3.j, establishes the principle that “social justice and social security are bases of lasting peace”;

CONCERNED by the discrimination to which people are subject based on their disability;

BEARING IN MIND the agreement of the International Labour Organisation on the vocational rehabilitation and employment of disabled persons (Convention 159); the Declaration of the Rights of Mentally Retarded Persons (UN General Assembly resolution 2856 (XXVI) of December 20, 1971); the Declaration on the Rights of Disabled Persons (UN General Assembly resolution 3447 (XXX) of December 9, 1975); the World Programme of Action concerning Disabled Persons (UN General Assembly resolution 37/52 of December 3, 1982); the Additional Protocol to the American Convention on Human Rights in the area of Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights, “Protocol of San Salvador” (1988); the Principles for the Protection of Persons with Mental Illness and for the Improvement of Mental Health Care (UN General Assembly resolution 46/119 of December 17, 1991); the Declaration of Caracas of the Pan American Health Organization; resolution AG/RES. 1249 (XXIII-O/93), “Situation of Persons with Disabilities in the American Hemisphere”; the Standard Rules on the Equalization of Opportunities for Persons with Disabilities (UN General Assembly resolution 48/96 of December 20, 1993); the Declaration of Managua (December 1993); the Vienna Declaration and Programme of Action, adopted by the UN World Conference on Human Rights (157/93); resolution AG/RES. 1356 (XXV-O/95), “Situation of Persons with Disabilities in the American Hemisphere”; and AG/RES. 1369 (XXVI-O/96), “Panama Commitment to Persons with Disabilities in the American Hemisphere”; and

COMMITTED to eliminating discrimination, in all its forms and manifestations, against persons with disabilities,

HAVE AGREED as follows:

ARTICLE I

For the purposes of this Convention, the following terms are defined:

1. Disability

The term “disability” means a physical, mental, or sensory impairment, whether permanent or temporary, that limits the capacity to perform one or more essential activities of daily life, and which can be caused or aggravated by the economic and social environment.

2. Discrimination against persons with disabilities

a. The term “discrimination against persons with disabilities” means any distinction, exclusion, or restriction based on a disability, record of disability, condition resulting from a previous disability, or perception of disability, whether present or past, which has the effect or objective of impairing or nullifying the recognition, enjoyment, or exercise by a person with a disability of his or her human rights and fundamental freedoms.

b. A distinction or preference adopted by a state party to promote the social integration or personal development of persons with disabilities does not constitute discrimination provided that the distinction or preference does not in itself limit the right of persons with disabilities to equality and that individuals with disabilities are not forced to accept such distinction or preference. If, under a state's internal law, a person can be declared legally incompetent, when necessary and appropriate for his or her well-being, such declaration does not constitute discrimination.

ARTICLE II

The objectives of this Convention are to prevent and eliminate all forms of discrimination against persons with disabilities and to promote their full integration into society.

ARTICLE III

To achieve the objectives of this Convention, the states parties undertake:

1. To adopt the legislative, social, educational, labor-related, or any other measures needed to eliminate discrimination against persons with disabilities and to promote their full integration into society, including, but not limited to:

a. Measures to eliminate discrimination gradually and to promote integration by government authorities and/or private entities in providing or making available goods, services, facilities, programs, and activities such as employment, transportation, communications, housing, recreation, education, sports, law enforcement and administration of justice, and political and administrative activities;

b. Measures to ensure that new buildings, vehicles, and facilities constructed or manufactured within their respective territories facilitate transportation, communications, and access by persons with disabilities;

c. Measures to eliminate, to the extent possible, architectural, transportation, and communication obstacles to facilitate access and use by persons with disabilities; and

d. Measures to ensure that persons responsible for applying this Convention and domestic law in this area are trained to do so.

2. To work on a priority basis in the following areas:

a. Prevention of all forms of preventable disabilities;

b. Early detection and intervention, treatment, rehabilitation, education, job training, and the provision of comprehensive services to ensure the optimal level of independence and quality of life for persons with disabilities; and

c. Increasing of public awareness through educational campaigns aimed at eliminating prejudices, stereotypes, and other attitudes that jeopardize the right of persons to live as equals, thus promoting respect for and coexistence with persons with disabilities;

ARTICLE IV

To achieve the objectives of this Convention, the states parties undertake to:

1. Cooperate with one another in helping to prevent and eliminate discrimination against persons with disabilities;

2. Collaborate effectively in:

a. Scientific and technological research related to the prevention of disabilities and to the treatment, rehabilitation, and integration into society of persons with disabilities; and

b. The development of means and resources designed to facilitate or promote the independence, self-sufficiency, and total integration into society of persons with disabilities, under conditions of equality.

ARTICLE V

1. To the extent that it is consistent with their respective internal laws, the states parties shall promote participation by representatives of organizations of persons with disabilities, nongovernmental organizations working in this area, or, if such organizations do not exist, persons with disabilities, in the development, execution, and evaluation of measures and policies to implement this Convention.

2. The states parties shall create effective communication channels to disseminate among the public and private organizations working with persons with disabilities the normative and juridical advances that may be achieved in order to eliminate discrimination against persons with disabilities.

ARTICLE VI

1. To follow up on the commitments undertaken in this Convention, a Committee for the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Persons with Disabilities, composed of one representative appointed by each state party, shall be established.

2. The committee shall hold its first meeting within the 90 days following the deposit of the 11th instrument of ratification. Said meeting shall be convened by the General Secretariat of the Organization of American States and shall be held at the Organization’s headquarters, unless a state party offers to host it.

3. At the first meeting, the states parties undertake to submit a report to the Secretary General of the Organization for transmission to the Committee so that it may be examined and reviewed. Thereafter, reports shall be submitted every four years.

4. The reports prepared under the previous paragraph shall include information on measures adopted by the member states pursuant to this Convention and on any progress made by the states parties in eliminating all forms of discrimination against persons with disabilities. The reports shall indicate any circumstances or difficulties affecting the degree of fulfillment of the obligations arising from this Convention.

5. The Committee shall be the forum for assessment of progress made in the application of the Convention and for the exchange of experience among the states parties. The reports prepared by the committee shall reflect the deliberations; shall include information on any measures adopted by the states parties pursuant to this Convention, on any progress they have made in eliminating all forms of discrimination against persons with disabilities, and on any circumstances or difficulties they have encountered in the implementation of the Convention; and shall include the committee's conclusions, its observations, and its general suggestions for the gradual fulfillment of the Convention.

6. The committee shall draft its rules of procedure and adopt them by a simple majority.

7. The Secretary General shall provide the Committee with the support it requires in order to perform its functions.

ARTICLE VII

No provision of this Convention shall be interpreted as restricting, or permitting the restriction by states parties of the enjoyment of the rights of persons with disabilities recognized by customary international law or the international instruments by which a particular state party is bound.

ARTICLE VIII

1. This Convention shall be open for signature by all member states in Guatemala City, Guatemala, on June 8, 1999, and, thereafter, shall remain open for signature by all states at the headquarters of the Organization of American States, until its entry into force.

2. This Convention is subject to ratification.

3. This Convention shall enter into force for the ratifying states on the 30th day following the date of deposit of the sixth instrument of ratification by a member state of the Organization of American States.

ARTICLE IX

After its entry into force, this Convention shall be open for accession by all states that have not signed it.

ARTICLE X

1. The instruments of ratification and accession shall be deposited with the General Secretariat of the Organization of American States.

2. For each state that ratifies or accedes to the Convention after the sixth instrument of ratification has been deposited, the Convention shall enter into force on the 30th day following deposit by that state of its instrument of ratification or accession.

ARTICLE XI

1. Any state party may make proposals for amendment of this Convention. Said proposals shall be submitted to the General Secretariat of the OAS for dissemination to the states parties.

2. Amendments shall enter into force for the states ratifying them on the date of deposit of the respective instruments of ratification by two thirds of the member states. For the remaining states parties, they shall enter into force on the date of deposit of their respective instruments of ratification.

ARTICLE XII

The states may enter reservations to this Convention when ratifying or acceding to it, provided that such reservations are not incompatible with the aim and purpose of the Convention and relate to one or more specific provisions thereof.

ARTICLE XIII

This Convention shall remain in force indefinitely, but any state party may denounce it. The instrument of denunciation shall be deposited with the General Secretariat of the Organization of American States. The Convention shall cease to have force and effect for the denouncing state one year after the date of deposit of the instrument of denunciation, and shall remain in force for the other states parties. Such denunciation shall not exempt the state party from the obligations imposed upon it under this Convention in respect of any action or omission prior to the date on which the denunciation takes effect.

ARTICLE XIV

1. The original instrument of this Convention, the English, French, Portuguese, and Spanish texts of which are equally authentic, shall be deposited with the General Secretariat of the Organization of American States, which shall send a certified copy thereof to the United Nations Secretariat for registration and publication pursuant to Article 102 of the United Nations Charter.

2. The General Secretariat of the Organization of American States shall notify the member states of that Organization and the states that have acceded to the Convention of the signatures, deposits of instruments of ratification, accession, and denunciation, and any reservations entered.

AG/RES. 1620 (XXIX-O/99)

PROGRAM OF EDUCATION FOR PEACE IN THE HEMISPHERE

(Resolution adopted at the first plenary session,

held on June 7, 1999)

THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY,

HAVING SEEN the Annual Report of the Permanent Council (AG/doc.3830/99), and in particular the chapter on hemispheric security relating to the Program of Education for Peace in the Hemisphere (CP/CSH-184/99);

RECALLING its decision set out in resolution AG/RES. 1604 (XXVIII-O/98) to convene a meeting of experts from member states to design a draft Program of Education for Peace in the Hemisphere; and

BEARING IN MIND the recommendations by the Permanent Council with regard to the holding of the aforementioned meeting of experts,

RESOLVES:

1. To take note of the Report by the Permanent Council and its recommendations related to the Meeting of Experts to Design a Draft Program of Education for Peace in the Hemisphere.

2. To reiterate the importance of a Program of Education for Peace in the Hemisphere as a confidence- and security-building measure.

3. To reiterate its appreciation to the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) for its assistance in the development of this topic and in the holding of the said Meeting of Experts.

4. To thank the Government of Colombia for, and to accept, its generous offer to host the said Meeting of Experts in the city of Cartagena.

5. To set October 14 and 15, 1999 as the dates for the said Meeting of Experts.

6. To approve the following Draft Agenda for the said Meeting of Experts:

“Design a draft Program of Education for Peace in the Hemisphere, taking into account the following:

a. Education and peaceful settlement of conflicts

b. Education and the promotion of democratic values and practices

c. Education and the promotion of peace between states.”

7. To invite UNESCO and other pertinent institutions, including the Inter-American Defense College (IADC), the University for Peace, and the Latin American Faculty of Social Sciences (FLACSO), to participate in the said Meeting of Experts.

8. To instruct the Permanent Council to consider, through its Committee on Hemispheric Security, the draft Program on Education for Peace, to be designed by the said Meeting of Experts, and to take action aimed at the implementation of the said Program on Education.

9. To instruct the General Secretariat to continue lending its support to the Permanent Council and the Committee on Hemispheric Security in their execution of the mandates contained in this resolution.

AG/RES. 1621 (XXIX-O/99)

INTER-AMERICAN CONVENTION AGAINST THE ILLICIT MANUFACTURING

OF AND TRAFFICKING IN FIREARMS, AMMUNITION, EXPLOSIVES,

AND OTHER RELATED MATERIALS

(Resolution adopted at the first plenary session,

held on June 7, 1999)

THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY,

RECALLING resolution AG/RES. 1 (XXIV-E/97), in which it resolved to adopt and open for signature the Inter-American Convention against the Illicit Manufacturing of and Trafficking in Firearms, Ammunition, Explosives, and Other Related Materials;

WELCOMING the fact that the majority of member states of the Organization of American States have signed the Convention, which entered into force on July 1, 1998;

REAFFIRMING its determination to prevent, combat, and eradicate the illicit manufacturing of and trafficking in firearms, ammunition, explosives, and other related materials because of the harmful effects of these activities on the security of each state and the region as a whole, since they jeopardize the well-being of peoples, their social and economic development, and their right to live in peace;

STRESSING the urgent need for all states to take the appropriate measures to prevent, combat, and eradicate the illicit manufacturing of and trafficking in firearms, ammunition, explosives, and other related materials and to cooperate with one another in this area;

UNDERSCORING the importance of the Convention’s earliest possible entry into force in each of the member states of the Organization of American States as soon as possible; and

RECALLING that, under Article XXI of the Convention, the first regular meeting of the Consultative Committee shall be held within 90 days following deposit of the 10th instrument of ratification of the Convention; and emphasizing in this connection the importance of allowing the Consultative Committee to begin its work as envisaged in the Convention,

RESOLVES:

1. To urge all states that have not already done so to sign and/or ratify the Convention without delay.

2. To underscore the significance of the fact that the Convention has been taken as a model for negotiation of a Protocol to combat the illicit manufacturing of and trafficking in firearms, their parts and components, and ammunition within the framework of the negotiation of a convention against organized international crime, under the auspices of the United Nations.

3. To request the Secretary General to take the necessary steps to convene the first meeting of the Consultative Committee, pursuant to Article XXI of the Convention, as soon as he receives the 10th instrument of ratification.

4. To likewise request the Secretary General to present a report to the General Assembly at its thirtieth regular session on the status of signatures and ratifications of the Convention.

AG/RES. 1622 (XXIX-O/99)

CONSOLIDATION OF THE REGIME ESTABLISHED IN THE TREATY FOR
THE PROHIBITION OF NUCLEAR WEAPONS IN LATIN AMERICA
AND THE CARIBBEAN (TREATY OF TLATELOLCO)

(Resolution adopted at the first plenary session,

held on June 7, 1999)

THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY,

RECALLING its previous resolutions on this topic, especially resolutions AG/RES. 1499 (XXVII-O/97) and AG/RES. 1571 (XXVIII-O/98);

CONVINCED that the creation of nuclear-weapon-free zones is an important step, which significantly strengthens all aspects of the international nonproliferation regime, thus contributing to the maintenance of international peace and security;

CONVINCED ALSO that, as stated in the preamble to the Treaty of Tlatelolco, militarily denuclearized zones are not an end in themselves but rather a means for achieving general and complete disarmament at a later stage;

RECOGNIZING that the Treaty of Tlatelolco has become the model for the establishment of other nuclear-weapon-free zones in various regions of the world, such as the South Pacific (Treaty of Rarotonga), Southeast Asia (Treaty of Bangkok), and Africa (Treaty of Pelindaba), which, when they enter into force, will cover more than half the countries of the world and all the territories in the Southern Hemisphere;

NOTING WITH SATISFACTION that on August 21, 1998, Guatemala deposited its instrument of ratification of the amendment to the Treaty approved by resolution 267 (E-V) of the General Conference of the Agency for the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons in Latin America and the Caribbean (OPANAL);

NOTING WITH SATISFACTION ALSO that on January 18 and 20, 1999, respectively, Colombia and Costa Rica, deposited their instruments of ratification of the amendments to the Treaty approved by resolutions 267 (E-V), 268 (XII), and 290 (E-VII) of the General Conference of OPANAL; and

BEARING IN MIND that the Treaty of Tlatelolco is now in force for 32 sovereign states of the region,

RESOLVES:

1. To welcome the steps taken by a number of countries in the region to consolidate the regime established by the Treaty of Tlatelolco.

2. To urge the states of the region that have not yet done so to deposit their instruments of ratification of the Treaty of Tlatelolco, as well as of the amendments to the Treaty approved by the General Conference of the Agency for the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons in Latin America and the Caribbean (OPANAL) in resolutions 267 (E-V), 268 (XII), and 290 (E-VII).

3. To reaffirm the importance of strengthening OPANAL as the appropriate legal and political forum for ensuring unqualified observance of the Treaty in its zone of application and cooperation with the agencies of other nuclear-weapon-free zones.

4. To renew its appeal to those states that have not yet done so to negotiate, as soon as possible, multilateral or bilateral agreements with the International Atomic Energy Agency for application of that Agency’s safeguards to their nuclear activities, as stipulated in Article 13 of the Treaty of Tlatelolco.

5. To reaffirm its commitment to continue striving for a nonproliferation regime that is universal, genuine, and nondiscriminatory in every aspect.

6. To request the Secretary General to transmit this resolution to the Secretary General of OPANAL and to the Secretary-General of the United Nations.

AG/RES. 1623 (XXIX-O/99)

CONFIDENCE- AND SECURITY-BUILDING IN THE AMERICAS

(Resolution adopted at the first plenary session,

held on June 7, 1999)

THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY,

HAVING SEEN the Annual Report of the Permanent Council (AG/doc.3830/99) and, in particular, the section dealing with the Report of the Committee on Hemispheric Security (CP/CSH-180/99 rev. 3), which includes the subject “Confidence- and Security-Building in the Americas”;

BEARING IN MIND that, under Article 2 of the Charter of the Organization of American States, one of the essential purposes of the Organization is to strengthen the peace and security of the continent;

RECALLING its resolutions AG/RES. 1121 (XXI-O/91) and AG/RES. 1123 (XXI-O/91), on strengthening peace and security in the Hemisphere, and AG/RES. 1179 (XXII-O/92), AG/RES. 1237 (XXIII-O/93), AG/RES. 1284 (XXIV-O/94), AG/RES. 1288 (XXIV-O/94), AG/RES. 1353 (XXV-O/95), AG/RES. 1409 (XXVI-O/96), AG/RES. 1494 (XXVII-O/97), and AG/RES. 1566 (XXVIII-O/98), on confidence- and security-building measures;

EMPHASIZING the importance of the Declaration of San Salvador and the Declaration of Santiago on Confidence- and Security-Building Measures, which recommend that confidence- and security-building measures be applied in the manner deemed most appropriate;

RECOGNIZING the consolidation of democracy in the region, efforts to promote disarmament and international peace and security, and the willingness of states to continue strengthening confidence and security in the Hemisphere;

NOTING the significant progress made in identifying and applying confidence- and security-building measures since the adoption of the Declaration of Santiago, which has helped to reduce factors that generate distrust and has contributed to the promotion of transparency and mutual confidence, in keeping with the purposes and principles of the Charter of the Organization of American States, respect for international law, and the promotion of friendly and cooperative relations among states in the region;

NOTING with satisfaction the request made by the Governments of Argentina and Chile on July 30, 1998, to the United Nations Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC) that it develop a common methodology in order to facilitate the comparison of military expenditures of the two countries;

NOTING likewise with satisfaction the entry into force on December 26, 1997, of the Framework Treaty on Democratic Security in Central America and the Declaration of the Presidents of Central America and the Dominican Republic and the Representative of the Prime Minister of Belize on the Non Participation in the Acquisition of Strategic High-Technology and High-Cost Weapons of Mass Destruction, on November 6, 1997;

NOTING the results of the Conference of Defense Ministers of the Americas held in Cartagena de Indias from November 29 to December 3, 1998; and

REAFFIRMING:

That respect for international law, faithful adherence to treaties, the peaceful settlement of disputes, respect for state sovereignty and the principle of nonintervention, and prohibition of the use or threat of use of force, as set forth in the Charters of the OAS and the United Nations (UN), are the basis for peaceful coexistence and security in the Hemisphere and constitute the framework for the development of confidence- and security-building measures; and

That the application of confidence- and security-building measures, through practical and useful actions, will facilitate more far-reaching cooperation processes in the future in areas such as arms control and hemispheric security,

RESOLVES:

1. To urge member states to implement in the manner they deem most appropriate the recommendations of the Declaration of San Salvador and the Declaration of Santiago on Confidence- and Security-Building Measures and of resolution AG/RES. 1179 (XXII-O/92).

2. To call on all member states to continue to provide to the Secretary General, prior to April 15 each year, information on the application of confidence- and security-building measures, so as to facilitate the preparation of the complete and systematic inventory of these measures, in light of the provisions of the Declaration of San Salvador and the Declaration of Santiago and resolutions AG/RES. 1284 (XXIV-O/94) and AG/RES. 1288 (XXIV-O/94); and to commend member states that have regularly submitted their reports to that end.

3. To request the Secretary General to maintain and facilitate access to the comprehensive inventory of confidence- and security-building measures which the member states have submitted pursuant to the previous paragraph.

4. To urge member states once again to continue promoting transparency in matters related to defense policy, among other aspects, with regard to modernizing the armed forces, including changes in their structure and composition, and acquisition of equipment and materiel, in addition to presenting information that will make it possible to compare military expenditures in the region.

5. To request the Permanent Council to consider, through the Committee on Hemispheric Security, actions to promote the development and exchange of information concerning defense policies and doctrines.

6. To reiterate once again the importance of full participation by all member states in the United Nations Register of Conventional Arms, and of providing the required information for the preparation of the United Nations Standardized International Reporting of Military Expenditures, in accordance with the pertinent resolutions of the United Nations General Assembly; and to renew its request that member states provide said information to the Secretary General by June 15 of each year.

7. To request the Permanent Council to take the necessary steps, through the Committee on Hemispheric Security, to hold, no later than the first quarter of 2000, a meeting of parliamentarians on confidence- and security-building measures, as called for in the Declaration of San Salvador.

8. To urge member states once again to continue consultations and the exchange of ideas within the Hemisphere so as to make progress in the limitation and control of conventional arms in the region; and to instruct the Permanent Council to endeavor, through the Committee on Hemispheric Security, to advance the development of the most appropriate approach making it possible, at the regional level, to increase transparency and address questions related to conventional arms.

9. To recall the mandate set forth in resolution AG/RES. 1566 (XXVIII-O/98), which instructed the Permanent Council to hold each year a special meeting of the Committee on Hemispheric Security with the participation of experts dedicated to the analysis and exchange of information on confidence- and security-building measures in the region, especially those identified in the Declaration of San Salvador and the Declaration of Santiago.

10. To request the Secretary General to update each year, on the basis of information submitted by the member states, the roster of experts on confidence- and security-building measures, and to circulate it to the member states each year by June 1.

11. To instruct the Permanent Council to continue to support the participation of the Committee on Hemispheric Security in other regional forums, such as the Conference of Defense Ministers of the Americas.

12. Likewise to instruct the Permanent Council to continue to encourage the exchange of experience in the area of confidence- and security- building measures with other regions, which may include the exchange of information between the Committee on Hemispheric Security and other international organizations working on the subject, such as the United Nations, the Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE), and the Association of South-East Asian Nations (ASEAN) Regional Forum.

13. To instruct the Permanent Council to hold, through the Committee on Hemispheric Security, a seminar, attended by representatives of other regional organizations, for the exchange of experience on conflict resolution, the contribution of confidence- and security-building measures to conflict prevention, crisis management, and post-conflict reconstruction.

14. To request the Permanent Council to hold, through the Committee on Hemispheric Security, the next round of OAS-OSCE consultations in the year 2000 at the OAS.

15. To instruct the Permanent Council to consider, through the Committee on Hemispheric Security, the possibility of holding, in due course, another regional conference on confidence- and security- building measures.

16. To instruct the Permanent Council to carry out the activities mentioned in this resolution in keeping with resources allocated in the program-budget and other resources.

17. To renew its invitation to the Inter-American Defense to provide, pursuant to resolution AG/RES. 1240 (XXIII-O/93), advisory and consultative services in matters related to confidence- and security-building measures of a military nature; and to request it to keep an updated inventory of these measures.

18. To request the Permanent Council to report to the General Assembly on the implementation of this resolution.

19. To request the Secretary General to transmit this resolution to the Secretary-General of the United Nations and the Secretary General of the OSCE and to other pertinent regional organizations.

AG/RES. 1624 (XXIX-O/99)

INTER-AMERICAN SUPPORT FOR THE CONVENTION ON THE PROHIBITION OF THE DEVELOPMENT, PRODUCTION, STOCKPILING AND USE OF
CHEMICAL WEAPONS AND ON THEIR DESTRUCTION

(Resolution adopted at the first plenary session,

held on June 7, 1999)

THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY,

HAVING SEEN the Annual Report of the Permanent Council (AG/doc.3830/99) and in particular, the section dealing with the Report of the Committee on Hemispheric Security (CP/CSH-202/99 rev. 1) which includes the subject “Inter-American Support for the Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production, Stockpiling and Use of Chemical Weapons and on Their Destruction”;

REAFFIRMING that one of the essential purposes of the Organization of American States (OAS) is the strengthening of peace and security of the continent;

BEARING IN MIND the pledge of Heads of State and Government in the Santiago Declaration of the Second Summit of the Americas to continue promoting transparency in matters related to defense policy;

RECALLING its resolution on “Cooperation for Security and Development in the Hemisphere: Regional Contributions to Global Security” [AG/RES. 1236 (XXIII-O/93)] which recognized the efforts of the member states to contribute to regional and global security and which commended them for their accession to the principles of the Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production, Stockpiling and Use of Chemical Weapons and on Their Destruction;

RECALLING FURTHER that in its resolution AG/RES. 1236 (XXIII-O/93) it requested that the Special Committee on Hemispheric Security consider, inter alia, “the prevention of all forms of proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and their delivery systems by the adoption of appropriate controls on the exportation of dual-use goods and technologies, taking due account of their legitimate use for peaceful purposes”;

WELCOMING the fact that the majority of member states of the Organization of American States signed the Convention, which entered into force on April 29, 1997;

BEARING IN MIND that the Convention is now in force for 20 of the 35 member states of the Organization of American States;

EMPHASIZING the urgent need for all states to take the necessary measures to prevent the spread and use of chemical weapons;

NOTING that universal adherence to and fulfillment of this Convention is the best defense against the proliferation and use of chemical weapons;

UNDERSCORING the importance of the Convention entering into force in each of the member states of the Organization of American States as soon as possible;

NOTING that the next Conference of States Parties of the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons takes place in The Hague from June 28 to July 2, 1999; and

FURTHER NOTING that as of April 29, 2000, the chemicals listed in Schedule 2 of the Convention shall only be transferred to or received from states parties, including for activities not prohibited by the Convention,

RESOLVES:

1. To reaffirm its commitment to the principles of the Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production, Stockpiling and Use of Chemical Weapons and on Their Destruction.

2. To welcome the specific steps taken by a number of member states of the Organization of American States to implement and consolidate the regime established by the said Convention.

3. To urge the governments of the region that have not yet done so, to ratify or accede to the Convention as soon as possible.

4. To request that the General Secretariat transmit this resolution to the Secretary-General of the United Nations and to the Director General of the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons.

AG/RES. 1625 (XXIX-O/99)

STATUS OF WOMEN IN THE AMERICAS AND STRENGTHENING AND
MODERNIZATION OF THE INTER-AMERICAN COMMISSION OF WOMEN

(Resolution adopted at the first plenary session,

held on June 7, 1999)

The General Assembly,

RECALLING its resolutions AG/RES. 1422 (XXVI-O/96), “Cooperation within the Inter-American System to Ensure Full and Equal Participation by Women in the Development Process”; AG/RES. 1432 (XXVI-O/96), “Status of Women in the Americas”; AG/RES. 1451 (XXVII-O/97) and AG/RES. 1586 (XXVIII-O/98), “Observations and Recommendations on the Annual Reports of the Organs, Agencies, and Entities of the Organization”;

BEARING IN MIND AG/RES. 1592 (XXVIII-O/98), “Status of Women in the Americas and Strengthening of the Inter-American Commission of Women,” presented by the mechanism for coordination of the topic "Status of Women in the Americas" of the Permanent Council, which invited the Inter-American Commission of Women to carry out a series of activities aimed at strengthening the Commission, including the preparation of a draft "Inter-American Program on the Promotion on Women's Rights and Gender Equity"; the promotion, in coordination with other inter-American organs, agencies, and entities, of forums, seminars, and meetings among the national authorities in the member states responsible for women's issues, and the holding of meetings among agencies of the inter-American system;

NOTING resolution CP/RES. 717 (1147/98), “70th Anniversary of the Establishment of the Inter-American Commission of Women (CIM)”;

NOTING WITH SATISFACTION resolution CIM/RES. 209 (XXIX-O/98) “Strengthening and Modernization of the Inter-American Commission of Women,” of the CIM Assembly of Delegates which, among other things, urges the governments of the member states to support the activities of the CIM delegates; urges the permanent representatives of the member states to the OAS to appoint, if one does not exist, an official from their respective missions with whom the CIM Permanent Secretariat may maintain contact to reinforce involvement by the principal delegates in the CIM's activities; requests inclusion on the agenda of the General Assembly of the item “Inter-American Program on the Promotion of Women’s Rights and Gender Equity”; and resolves to encourage and agree upon, within the OAS, a meeting of ministers or of the highest-ranking authorities responsible for policies for the advancement of women in the member states, with the participation of the CIM delegates;

CONSIDERING that the CIM Strategic Plan of Action establishes strategies for ensuring and guaranteeing the role of women to the year 2000 and assigns, for the five-year period, priority to the participation of women in power and decision-making structures, and to education, the elimination of violence, and the eradication of poverty;

BEARING IN MIND the plans of action of the First and the Second Summit of the Americas, which set forth the need to: (a) strengthen policies and programs to improve and broaden the participation of women in all spheres of political, social, and economic life; (b) strengthen and establish, where they do not exist, national mechanisms and governmental agencies charged with promoting legal equality and equal opportunities for women and men, focused on gender equity, and provide them with adequate and timely financial resources, and (c) further strengthen the Inter-American Commission of Women;

HIGHLIGHTING the resolutions approved at the Twenty-ninth Assembly of Delegates of the CIM, held in November 1998, and in particular resolution CIM/Res. 198 (XXIX-O/98), “CIM Plan of Action for the Participation of Women in Power and Decision-Making Structures,” and CIM/RES. 195 (XXIX-O/98), “Declaration of Santo Domingo,” which states that the rights of women, throughout their lives, are an inalienable, integral, and indivisible part of universal human rights, and that it is imperative to ensure full observance of the human rights of women so as to eliminate all discriminatory situations and recognize women’s legal capacity and equality under the law;

RECOGNIZING that the CIM, established in 1928 by a resolution of the Sixth International Conference of American States, was the first intergovernmental organization in the world founded expressly to fight for the civil and political rights of women in the Hemisphere;

UNDERLINING that the purpose of the CIM is to promote and protect the rights of women and support the member states in their efforts to ensure full access to civil, political, economic, social, and cultural rights, which will permit women and men to participate under equal conditions in all aspects of social life, so that they may enjoy fully and equitably the benefits of development; and

AWARE that, to achieve its objectives, it is necessary to promote the institutional strengthening of the CIM, which requires the ongoing political support of the OAS member states, and to find a solution to the various budgetary matters confronting it,

RESOLVES:

1. To call a meeting of ministers or of the highest-ranking authorities responsible for the advancement of women in the member states, during the first three months of the year 2000, and to request that necessary funds from the year 2000 program-budget be assigned for holding that meeting.

2. To request the CIM, acting as coordinator for the aforementioned meeting, to prepare a draft agenda that will include, among other things, approval of the "Draft Inter-American Program on the Promotion of Women’s Rights and Gender Equity," and consideration of the commitments adopted by the Summit of the Americas.

3. To request the CIM to keep the Permanent Council informed of the progress made in the preparatory work of said meeting, taking into account any possible recommendations of that organ.

4. To urge the member states to support the activities being carried out by the CIM delegates to support and contribute to the holding of the aforementioned meeting.

5. To reiterate to the General Secretariat and the Permanent Council the contents of its resolution AG/RES. 1586 (XXVIII-O/98), with a view to improving the financial condition of the Inter-American Commission of Women.

6. To decide to include on the agenda of the thirtieth regular session of the General Assembly the item: Approval of the “Inter-American Program on the Promotion of Women’s Rights and Gender Equity,” and to request the Permanent Council to report on the implementation of this resolution to the General Assembly at its thirtieth regular session.

7. To support the initiative of the Twenty-ninth Assembly of Delegates of the CIM regarding the establishment of a system of communication and ongoing cooperation with nongovernmental organizations of civil society.

8. To encourage the CIM to continue developing the initiative of establishing an information network as the ideal mechanism to ensure effective coordination and the exchange of information both with the organs, agencies, and entities of the inter-American system and with the areas of the OAS General Secretariat and civil society organizations, and among delegates of the CIM and national cooperation committees.

APPENDIX

INTER-AMERICAN PROGRAM FOR THE PROMOTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS

1. INTRODUCTION

In 1997, the General Assembly, in its resolution “International Promotion of Human Rights in the Inter-American System” [AG/RES. 1489 (XXVII-O/97) of June 5, 1997], after welcoming the conclusions of the Committee on Juridical and Political Affairs (which is dealt with further on) resolved:

To request the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights to prepare, without reducing its protection activities and in collaboration and/or consultation with other pertinent organs and entities, a draft inter-American program for the international promotion of human rights, to be submitted to the Permanent Council for consideration before the twenty-eight regular session of the General Assembly, a task that should be carried out within the allocated resources approved in the program-budget and other resources.

The Commission, in consultation and coordination with other organs and entities, prepared the present draft program. Taken into account for this purpose were the valuable contributions of the governments of Costa Rica, Mexico, Peru, and Venezuela, made in response to a request by the Commission inviting observations on the development of the program. Also taken into consideration were written remarks from the governments of Argentina, Canada, United States, and Venezuela, provided to the Permanent Council’s Committee on Juridical and Political Affairs (OEA/Ser.G.,CP/doc.2909/97), as well as remarks made during the deliberations of those bodies on this matter. This draft program was considered and approved by the Commission at its 98th session, to be submitted to the Permanent Council, in accordance with the request by the General Assembly.

2. PROGRAM GUIDELINES

This program will use as guidelines the essential principles established by the modern doctrine and practice of human rights, recognized by international instruments and by the inter-American system; in particular, the American Declaration on the Rights and Duties of Man, and the American Convention on Human Rights.

These program principles will guide the development of activities already delineated, as well as the future incorporation of new activities in the program. They will also provide the substantive framework for evaluating the implementation of those activities, their substantive results, and evaluation of the program’s achievements. These essential principles are:

a. That everyone is born free and equal, in dignity and in rights, and, being endowed by nature with reason and conscience, should conduct themselves fraternally one to another. It is the duty of the individual so to conduct himself in relation to others that each and every one may fully form and develop his personality.ⁱ

b. That the essential human rights are not derived from the fact the individual is a national of a certain state, but are based upon attributes of his human personality.ⁱⁱ

c. That juridical and political institutions, which regulate life in human society, have as their principal aim the protection of the essential rights of man and the creation of circumstances that will permit him or her to achieve spiritual and material progress and attain happiness, without distinction as to race, sex, language, or creed.ⁱⁱⁱ Priority shall be given to the protection of human rights and development of members of the weakest and more vulnerable groups in society. Extreme poverty and social exclusion are a violation against human dignity.^iv

d. All human rights, economic, social, cultural, civil and political, are universal, indivisible and interdependent and interrelated. While the significance of national and regional particularities and various historical, cultural and religious backgrounds must be borne in mind, it is the duty of the States, regardless of their political, economic and cultural systems, to promote and protect all human rights and fundamental freedoms.^v

e. That representative democracy is the sole political system which guarantees respect for human rights and the rule of law ; it safeguards cultural diversity, pluralism, respect for the rights of minorities, and peace within and among nations.^vi

f. That the right to development is an integral part of fundamental human rights, and should be fulfilled so as to meet equitably the developmental and environmental needs of present and future generations. While development facilitates the enjoyment of human rights, the lack of development may not be invoked to justify the abridgement of internationally recognized human rights.^vii

g. That the peoples and states of the Americas have the responsibility to end racism, intolerance and xenophobia, and discrimination for reasons of race or gender.^viii

h. That Indigenous and Afro-American peoples of the Americas constitute an organized, distinctive and integral segment of their population and are entitled to be part of the national identities of the countries, and have a special role to play in strengthening the institutions of the state and in establishing national unity based on democratic principles and full respect to the human rights for all.^ix

i. That violence against women is an offense against human dignity, a violation of human rights and a manifestation of the historically unequal power relations between women and men.^x That the child shall enjoy special protection, and shall be given opportunities and facilities, by law and by other means, to enable him to develop physically, mentally, morally, spiritually and socially in a healthy and normal manner and in conditions of freedom and dignity.^xi

j. An independent, impartial and effective administration of justice is a decisive part of full enjoyment of human rights, of democracy and of sustainable development.^xii The institutions of the member States and their agents, are the first and principal responsibles to respect, protect and defend human rights, and to administer justice for their eventual violations. Transparency and publicity of public actions are a requisite for a system respectful of human rights and democratic.

k. That international organs for promotion of the observance and defense of human rights, and in particular the Inter-American Commission and Court of Human Rights, act as mechanisms coadyuvant and complementary of the national action, and the States have formally committed themselves to respect and to support them in the fulfillment of their mandates.

l. Education shall strengthen respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms. Education in all its modalities shall include the subject of human rights and should promote understanding, tolerance, peace and friendly relations between the individuals, between the groups and between nations; as well as teach for peaceful conflict resolution, and for understanding and realization of the rights and duties of each person.^xiii

3. PROGRAM’S CONCEPTUAL AND INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK

In order to fulfill the General Assembly’s request it is necessary to define the concept of the promotion of human rights, as well as the institutional and functional framework of the Commission and other organs and entities in regard to this issue. The Charter of the OAS and the Convention, it establishes that the primary function of the Commission is to “promote the observance and defense of human rights.” This is confirmed by its historical practice of 38 years. That “promotion of observance and defense” can come about through a) “protection”, i.e., in particular, through the system of dealing with individual cases by the Commission and the Court, with its determinations of State responsibilities, and recommendations for redress; b) through the “establishing of international standards”, via proposed instruments, and the doctrine and jurisprudence of the system; c) the investigation of general situations, and recommendations to States in this regard; and d) activities involving education and dissemination of information.

“Protection” activities by means of the system of individual cases, the establishing of international standards, and the investigation of general situations and corresponding recommendations, are the Commission’s primary mandate. These are also the most effective and practical ways for the Commission to fulfill its main function of “promoting the observance and defense of human rights.”

Additionally, the Commission is responsible for making every possible effort to disseminate through other means (educational means such as seminars, publications, etc.) information about the nature and operation of the inter-American system of human rights. As is described further on, the Commission has done and continues to do this with existing resources.

Lastly, as this program has attempted to reflect, the Commission can help to mobilize all of the resources and abilities of the various members, organs and entities of OAS to collaborate in other ways and through other means in the task of “fostering an awareness of human rights in the peoples of the Americas.”

Primary Functions of the Commission. “Protection and defense”

The Convention and its rules of procedure establish the overriding importance of the Commission’s role in “promoting observance and defense” in prescribing, as mechanisms of paramount importance in carrying this out, the system of “protection”, through the processing of individual communications, the system for monitoring and reporting on general situations, mechanisms for precautionary and preventive measures, and recommendations and studies carried out by the Organization and its members.

“Protection and defense” are vitally important functions in the Convention and in the practical reality of the Americas and the inter-American system. As a matter of fact protection and defense have promoted human rights, as shown by the thousands of cases submitted to the system by persons and institutions of all levels and from every social and geographic sector. This is demonstrated by the coverage given by the various media to decisions and actions of the Commission and of the Court. This is also proved by the impact and mobilizing of civil society and state organs as a result of reports of the Commission and its on-site visits.

Establishing of international standards is central to promoting observance and protection of human rights

As is indicated by the Convention and by the practice of the system, activities for “establishing standards of international human rights law” are a principal function and primary form of promoting the observance and protection of human rights.

The General Assembly has understood this in requesting that the Commission and other organs of the OAS cooperate in preparing new conventions, protocols, and declarations in the area of human rights, which have afterwards been adopted and ratified, and which are fully a part of the human rights which are in effect in the region – in some cases carrying juridical power, having been included as an integral part of the constitutions of the countries, in others having force through international commitments.^xiv

By the same token, jurisprudence, doctrine, and the interpretation of international instruments carried out by the Court and the Commission further promote the observance and protection of human rights through the establishing of “standards”. The best indicator of this is their growing inclusion in national jurisprudence and their impact on national legislative activity.

Promotion of human rights in a broad sense also includes direct education and Dissemination

“Promotion”, considered in a broad sense, includes other elements (basically, activities related to education, training, and dissemination of information) which go beyond the concept of promotion in a strict sense, brought about by protection and the establishing of international standards.

It is activities of this type, related to education and the dissemination of information, that the Permanent Council and the Assembly were referring to in speaking of “promoting human rights”, arising from the conclusions and recommendations of the Special Session of the Permanent Council’s Juridical and Political Committee in March of 1997 regarding Point 1, “International Promotion of Human Rights in the Inter-American System”, restated by the General Assembly in its resolution, which can be summarized as follows:

· That in the current context of representative democracy, regional promotion should be stimulated, in order to foster a culture of tolerance, peace and development; and that the ratification and success of inter-American instruments and jurisdictions contribute to this.

· That the promotion and protection of human rights interact and are mutually reinforcing, that regional efforts and efforts carried out internally are complementary, and that in terms of promotion the latter are of paramount importance.

· That the IACHR should seek a “more intense push for and proper handling of” the job of promotion, without decreasing protection activities.

· That education, dissemination of information, the offering of grants, internships, and exchange of experiences among the states are effective means of promotion, using all possible technological mediums. That in terms of content, all human rights, guarantees, and national and international procedures, as well as IACHR reports and jurisprudence of the Court, should be included.

· That the priority should be the most vulnerable sectors of the public, as well as law enforcement forces and public opinion leaders.

· That according to the inter-American instruments, the IACHR has the primary responsibility for the task of promoting observance and defense at a regional level. That it will carry out this mission in coordination with other competent OAS organs, and with other organs of the inter-American system, governmental organs, and others (for example, the IIHR).

In the opinion of the Commission, this draft should be viewed in accordance with the conceptual explanation given above, in the sense that protection is the primary function of the IACHR, as its mandate establishes, and that it should deal with informational and educational promotion without distracting resources or importance from its protection activities. As a necessary corollary, and as the General Assembly resolution indicates, other organs of the inter-American system, states organs, NGOs, etc., should coordinate their action in this respect, as a premise of the inter-American program to be prepared.

The Commission and other inter-American and national organs and entities are already conducting activities for the educational promotion of human rights

The countries and their public and private institutions, and the organs of the inter-American system of protection, as well as other private organizations and notably the Inter-American Institute of Human Rights (IIHR), are carrying out, and have increased in recent years, the job of promotion, and especially of “education and dissemination of information”, as indicated in what follows.

4. CURRENT ACTIVITIES CONSISTENT WITH THE PROGRAM

Currently, valuable efforts in education and dissemination of information on human rights are being developed in the countries and in inter-American organizations of the region, covering various elements which this program should address and, where appropriate, include and aim to expand and strengthen.

The Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, within its limited resources, has also increasingly expanded its activities in “education and dissemination of information” aimed at making known, in a technical way, the nature, mechanisms and jurisprudence of the inter-American system.

To summarize, in the biennium 1996-1997, for example, the Commission has carried out:

· National seminars on the inter-American system (in Brazil, February of 1997; in Paraguay, also in 1997) with the assistance of several hundred professionals and officials of those countries and of countries that were invited to attend.

· The Commissioners meet regularly with the highest-level judicial and government authorities, in relation to inter-American human rights guidelines and their incorporation in national jurisprudence.

· The Commissioners, representing the Commission, and officials and attorneys of the Executive Secretariat participated as speakers in numerous technical and academic meetings, taught university courses, and training seminars and courses of various sorts.

· The Secretariat continued the “Rómulo Gallegos” fellowships program (with four grants in 1995-96 and six in 96-97, all for young attorneys in the region).

· In 1996-97 the Commission carried out activities for educational promotion and dissemination of information related to the preparation of the “Proposed American Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples,” fostering meetings for consultation and dissemination of information in fifteen countries in the region, and three regional meetings. For this, it coordinated with other systems and inter-American organs (UPD, III, IDB, Indigenous Fund, and the IIHR, among others) as well as state and nongovernmental organs.

· The Commission’s publications are without doubt a tool for education and dissemination of information. In the last biennium, the Commission published its Annual Reports in four languages, as well as the Special Reports on Brazil, Ecuador, and Haiti; this last one was also published in Creole.

· It also published the Basic Documents in the four languages; a pamphlet on “How to submit formal complaints to the inter-American system”, and several reference posters.

· With outside cooperation, the Commission supports the publication of the Inter-American Human Rights Yearbook, based on an arrangement with Nijhoff Publishers, Holland.

· Both the Commissioners and the members of the Executive Secretariat published numerous articles on technical subjects and dissemination of information regarding human rights.

· The Commission also uses electronic media for publishing and disseminating its public documents. All of the Annual Reports, other public documents and reports of the Commission are in the process of being placed electronically on a “site” which the Commission itself has on the Internet, accessible directly or through OAS’s “home page”.

· The Secretariat is continually carrying out working meetings with delegations of the member countries wishing to familiarize themselves with the system and its procedures. In this period, delegations of (among others) judges and judicial and police officials from Guatemala and Brazil, as well as from other countries, have been received; also, numerous delegations of indigenous leaders from several countries, and international experts.

· The Commission collaborates with American Human Rights Competition (Moot Court) begun in 1996, organized by the Washington College of Law, American University, in which nearly fifty teams from universities throughout the continent participate. Providing, in addition, assistance to other universities of the region wishing to replicate this activity in their countries.

The Inter-American Institute of Human Rights (headquartered in San José, Costa Rica) has a mandate based on teaching, research, and promotion of human rights and all related disciplines, with a multi-disciplinary emphasis that should take into account the needs and problems of Latin America.

To achieve these ends, the Institute has conducted, is carrying out, and has planned, activities such as:

· conferences, colloquia, courses, round tables, and seminars.

· research programs in human rights, both at the institutional level as well as with the cooperation of national or international institutions.

· Periodic publications in print and electronic (CD-ROM) form.

· shares responsibility for the Library jointly with the Inter-American Court of Human Rights.

· promotes and reports on human rights progress in Latin America through its Documentation Center.

· Advises governmental and civil entities on creating national programs to promote human rights.

In the biennium 96-97 the IIHR has carried out numerous projects through its different areas (education, public institutions, CAPEL for electoral development and observation, and civil society).

Other OAS organs, in particular the Inter-American Commission of Women (CIM), and the Unit for the Promotion of Democracy (UPD), have carried out, in this biennium, activities to promote human rights, within their specific programs. By way of example, CIM conducted seminars in Guatemala in August of 1997 on “Women and the Culture of Peace”; in Caracas in September on “Violence Against Women and the Family”.

Many current programs of the Unit for Promotion of Democracy serve to promote and strengthen respect for human rights and humanitarian goals:

· Monitoring elections and technical assistance: The OAS has monitored some 40 elections since 1989, and provides technical assistance to improve electoral administration and civic participation.

· Strengthening democratic institutions: The UPD supports efforts to strengthen legislative bodies, to teach democratic values and practices in schools, and to further develop municipal government and citizen participation at the local level. The UPD also supported a “human rights and democracy” course for Peruvian military and civilians.

· Peace building and national reconciliation activities: In Nicaragua, participated in the supervision of the demobilization of former combatants and supported their social reintegration . At the Special Mission to Suriname (1992 to 2000) monitored the peace process, the demobilization of combatants and demining. In Haiti, participated in the establishment of a human rights observation mission in 1992, later developed into the OAS/UN International Civilian Mission, still active in Haiti today. The UPD assistance to the Guatemalan peace process includes support for the reincorporation of former combatants into society; an innovative conflict prevention and resolution initiative; and legislative and electoral reform programs related to the implementation of the peace accords.

· Removing land mines: Since 1995, the UPD and the Inter-American Defense Board have been undertaking a major regional program to assist Central American countries in eliminating land mines in Costa Rica, Honduras, Nicaragua and Guatemala.

· Publications and information exchange: Along with Georgetown University and other partners, supports the Political Database of the Americas, a comprehensive compilation of the constitutions, electoral laws and other legislation of the Americas at the Internet. In collaboration with the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, organized two Democratic Fora, one in “Celebration of International Human Rights Day” (1995), and the other on “Democracy and Indigenous Rights” (1996). The IACHR and the UPD also collaborated in the organization of two regional meetings of the “Consultation on the draft American Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples,” held Guatemala and Ecuador in 1996. The UPD regularly publishes reports from its electoral missions, Democratic Forums and a quarterly newsletter.

The guidelines established for member countries, for the Inter-American Council for Integral Development (CIDI), have not included specifically the subject of “Human Rights” in its Strategic Plan now in effect. Nevertheless, in its activities related to the promotion of democracy in the educational and cultural spheres, activities connected with the practice of human rights is naturally included. Along these lines, CIDI has indicated that if countries have interest and are in agreement, and following its normal systems for decision-making and implementation, it will set up activities on this subject, relying on special or regular funding, as the case may be.

Bearing in mind the importance of recognizing human rights in reference to indigenous peoples, this program should also consider, in its development process, coordination with the activities planned by the Inter-American Indian Institute in its Inter-American Indigenous Cooperation Program, which was formed in response to the demand by these peoples, communities, and organizations, activities whose content is the defense of human rights. Included in these activities planned for the coming years, and which could be incorporated in this program, are the following:

· Permanent Forum of Indigenous Peoples within OAS (The “Human Rights” issue is a fundamental part of the forums planned for the period 1998-2001).

· Forum of Indigenous Women of the Americas

· Indigenous Communication Network of the Americas

· “Manuel Gamio” Information and Documentation Center for Indigenous Peoples of the Americas.

· Graduate and postgraduate training Grants for strengthening indigenous leadership.

Among other advances, national public institutions have introduced cognitive, emotional, and behavioral aspects of human rights as part of the curricula at many levels of formal education, though this is still a new area. There already exist in the region, and in the world, training programs, materials, and manuals which can be used to advantage. The armed forces and security forces are introducing those elements as part of their training and practice. Preparation of the National Human Rights Plans by countries has also provided an opportunity to carry out numerous activities to promote thought and education on the subject.

Many civil society initiatives–especially those in the most vulnerable sectors--are also designed to provide training in an awareness and the defense of human rights.

5. THE THREE OBJECTIVES OF THE PROGRAM

A. REINFORCING THE FUNCTION OF PROTECTION AND DEFENSE, BY DISSEMINATING INFORMATION ABOUT THE NORMS AND PROCEDURES OF THE INTER-AMERICAN SYSTEM

As indicated in the Charter of the OAS and in the American Convention on Human Rights, “promoting observance and defense” constitute the Commission’s primary function. Consequently, it will focus its participation strictly on this objective of the Inter-American Program for the Promotion of Human Rights, disseminating and conducting training and analysis activities on inter-American norms and on the system’s procedures.

B. STRENGTHENING OF NATIONAL INSTITUTIONS RESPONSIBLE FOR PROTECTING AND PROMOTING HUMAN RIGHTS

The program should provide the means for national institutions responsible for protecting and promoting human rights to improve their capabilities for action and protection. This second objective includes educating state institutions and their members to act with strict respect for human rights.

C. EDUCATING THE ENTIRE POPULATION AND, IN PARTICULAR, VULNERABLE GROUPS IN THE HEMISPHERE, ON HUMAN RIGHTS

The program should look to reinforcing the task carried out by international and national organizations to create an awareness and knowledge of human rights and on a culture of tolerance in different sectors of the population and, above all, those most vulnerable and the new generations.

6. THE PROGRAM’S EXECUTING AGENCIES

Executing agencies of this program will be the IACHR and other inter-American and national organs, both public and private.

The inclusion in this program of an institution as the executor of or collaborator in an activity, whether that activity is currently in execution or is proposed for the future, will be done with full respect for, and with the understanding that that inclusion shall not infringe in any way on the autonomy and decision-making mechanisms of the various institutions mentioned, including the Commission. In that same sense, the activities conducted within the framework of this program therefore shall be planned, negotiated, implemented, and evaluated according to the normal procedures dictated by the legal instruments and practices of the institutions involved. This includes both international and national, as well as governmental and state and nongovernmental institutions and entities.

Nature of the activities of the program’s various executing agencies:

With regard to the IACHR

In terms of content, the IACHR will focus its activities in this program on promoting the inter-American system, its instruments, procedures, and jurisprudence. In relation to those receiving the benefits of the program, the IACHR understands that its efforts should be directed, in the state sector, toward the areas most directly connected with its activity (officials dealing with provincial government, domestic and foreign relations; members of the judicial branch; ombudsmen); and in civil society, toward officials of nongovernmental organizations and those who defend human rights in general.

In terms of the methodology to be used in the program’s activities, that which the IACHR develops should be in the direction of technical education; i.e., it should center on the training of human resources in understanding and implementation of the inter-American instruments, and on the preparation of materials for disseminating information on the system’s regulations and standards.

Both in content and in the defining of techniques and strategies for activities within its purview, the IACHR should act with the same autonomy given to it and required of it by the Charter of the OAS, its Statute and the American Convention, and in such a way that the activities which may be carried out within this program complement and promote its central activities, in other words, “without diminishing protection activities”.

Coordination with other agencies and entities

The General Assembly resolution requests that the inter-American program be developed "in coordination with other competent OAS bodies and in cooperation with the agencies and entities of the inter-American system as well as the Inter-American Institute of Human Rights and other governmental and nongovernmental organizations and institutions.” [AG/RES. 1489 (XXVII/O-97) par. 2.11].

As mentioned earlier, these entities, and in particular the IIHR, the III, CIM, the UPD, and numerous national entities, are already carrying out programs and activities clearly aimed at the objectives of this program. Their participation shall be in accordance with their rules, their abilities, resources, priorities and their own characteristics.

7. THE THREE PROGRAM AREAS

In line with the objectives mentioned previously, the program will be subdivided in three broad areas which, in turn, will comprise sub-programs and specific activities. These three areas will be: 1) an area designed for activities aimed strictly at disseminating information on inter-American norms and the system’s mechanisms, as well as training in these topics; 2) an area designed to strengthen national institutions, both state and private, concerned with respect for and defense of human rights; 3) an area dealing with education, spreading and disseminating information on the human rights subject and its practices.

The Commission will focus its action in the first of these areas, as well as elements of the second area, to the extent that they have a direct relation to the norms and mechanisms of the system; in both cases, according to its resources and “without diminishing its protection activity.” Other national and inter-American agencies and entities, as each case warrants, will primarily have a role in the second and third areas, participating also in the activities of dissemination and training on regulations and mechanisms of the inter-American system (1st area).

I. AREA ON NORMS AND MECHANISMS OF THE INTER-AMERICAN SYSTEM

General Objective of the Area: Provide information and training on the norms and mechanisms of the inter-American system, in particular its system of claims and individual cases, procedures of the Commission and of the Inter-American Court, its jurisprudence and decision-making process; the content and nature of its recommendations and decisions; the roles and powers of the system’s various participants; its actions in developing new international standards; and analysis of its capabilities and limitations. The public receiving the benefits of this program will be those in both the public sector and civil society who, because of their job or their situation, have the greatest need for dealing with the system or applying its standards and doctrine.

1. Program of courses and seminars on regulations and mechanisms of the inter-American system

a. IACHR seminar on the inter-American human rights system

(In execution)

Executing organ: IACHR

Objective: To train state officials with responsibilities in this area, as well as defenders of human rights from nongovernmental organizations, on the nature and operation of the system, and familiarize them with its basic jurisprudence.

Characteristics: Intensive advanced seminar for judges and attorneys. Duration 2 to 3 days. The different powers of the Commission are analyzed, and in particular the system of individual cases, their handling before the Commission and before the inter-American Court. Already carried out in Brazil, Argentina, and Paraguay.

Funding: Relying on resources from its regular budget, the Commission provides for the holding of the seminar twice per year, covering the costs of travel and lodging for teachers and support personnel. The country acting as headquarters, where the seminar takes place, must cover additional costs.

b. Annual IACHR course on the inter-American system

(New activity)

Executing organ: IACHR

Objective: To improve jurists, judges, and state officials in the management and jurisprudence of the organs of the inter-American system, and serve as a seminar for reflection on legal and substantive issues of the inter-American system’s regulations, and on the practices of its protective organs.

In a way similar to the seminar (see 1.a) the course would be aimed at professionals and state officials, and would include a more in-depth analysis. It would be conducted in Washington, D.C., for a period of one week, once per year. The course would be restricted to 30 to 50 participants.

The participants will be selected by IACHR, with 50% reserved for candidates submitted by the states, and the remainder chosen from among candidates whose application is submitted directly.

Estimated Cost: $200,000. (Requires additional funding)

c. Annual IACHR conference with high-level judicial magistrates of the Americas

(New activity)

Executing organ: IACHR with support from the supreme court or judicial organ of the country where the conference is headquartered.

Objective: Bring together once per year for two days members of the Commission and high-level judicial magistrates (including supreme court, constitutional courts, appeals courts, military judges, defenders of the people) to analyze the juridical and practical framework for applying the inter-American human rights instruments in domestic jurisprudential practice.

Funding: Commissioners’ travel expenses the responsibility of the regular IACHR budget. Remaining expenses that of the judicial agency of each and/or the host country.

d. IACHR/CARICOM seminar to familiarize ombudsmen of the English-speaking Caribbean with the inter-American system

(New activity)

Executing organ: IACHR with the cooperation of CARICOM

Objectives: As became evident in the meeting of ombudsmen of the English- speaking Caribbean (Antigua, March of 1998), there is an interest, on the part of the public defenders of human rights referred to, in gaining a knowledge of the system’s norms and mechanisms, an interest that this proposed seminar of a day and a half would attempt to fulfill. An additional objective is to facilitate reciprocal communication on jurisprudence and situations in the Caribbean for increasing people’s knowledge about the Commission.

Funding: The IACHR could cover with the regular budget the participation of commissioners and specialists, and the host country or organization would cover remaining costs.

e. Seminar on the Future of the Inter-American System for the Protection of Human Rights

(New activity)

Executing organ: IIHR

Objectives: Promote constructive dialogue in different inter-American forums on proposed revision and reform of the operation of the Inter-American System for the Protection of Human Rights.

Characteristics: Training course aimed at different people acting within various work areas related to the inter-American system. This will be conducted in October of 1998.

Funding: IIHR’s regular budget

f. Project involving regional or subregional workshops on the inter-American system

(In execution)

Executing organ: IIHR

Objective: Familiarize the community of attorneys and magistrates of the countries with the inter-American system, so that they gain a better knowledge of it and debate its future, as well as incorporating decisions and sentences made by organs of domestic law.

Funding: IIHR’s regular budget and special contributions.

2. Program of fellowships and internships related to the inter-American system

a. IACHR “Rómulo Gallegos” fellowship program

(In execution)

Executing organ: IACHR with the administrative cooperation of OAS’s Department of Fellowships.

Objectives: It has offered, since 1991, the opportunity for new attorneys from the OAS member states to gain familiarity with the activities of the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights.

Characteristics: Consists of internships of ten months at the headquarters of the Executive Secretariat, for young lawyers, selected by the Commission in an open competition. The work program includes: a) acting as intern in the tasks of the Commission’s Executive Secretariat, under the supervision of its specialists during the period of the grant; b) requires commitment to giving a course on the Inter-American System for the Protection of Human Rights in the year following the end of the grant at an institution in the grantee’s country. Affiliation with the bar association or relevant authority. The grantee shall submit a report at the end of the grant period.

Requirements: a) must be a graduate in law at an officially accredited university; b) must be registered as an attorney with the courts or the appropriate bar association; c) must have demonstrated professional interest in the legal area of human rights; d) must be bilingual in English and Spanish; e) must have received his or her diploma not more than five years prior to the grant; f) must be a citizen of an OAS member state; g) must submit a written essay on a human rights topic.

Benefits: The IACHR provides a total of US$18,000 to each fellow for the period covered by the internship grant; round-trip ticket from the country of origin, and health insurance.

Funding: The IACHR offers three grants and obtains external funding for additional grantees. In 1997-98, five grants were given, three using regular IACHR funds and the other two using funding from other institutions.

b. IACHR internship program

(In execution)

Executing organ: IACHR, within the Internship Program of OAS.

Program objectives: Familiarize young postgraduate students of universities in the region with the theory and practice of human rights and of the Commission, as well as with the general operation of OAS.

Characteristics: This is a program which has been carried out over the last decade, comprising short internships for postgraduate students with degrees in law to be carried out at the Commission’s Executive Secretariat, working under the direct supervision of specialists. They also participate in the OAS internship program’s general activities. The interns do not receive any funding from the Organization, although they may be supported by outside institutions. Duration: two to four months. Selection: three times per year. Number of internships: varying between 3 and 5 quarterly.

Funding: No special funding required.

3. Program of publications and dissemination of information on the inter-American human rights system

a. Regular publications of the IACHR

(In execution)

Executing organ: IACHR

Objective: To record and publicly disseminate the decisions and reports of the Commission. Currently, the Commission distributes its publications to hundreds of state entities, universities, NGOs, and experts through the mail. Systematic development of a program for sending material electronically, via e-mail, is also being proposed, in order to make distribution less expensive, faster, and more extensive.

Characteristics: The IACHR currently publishes and regularly distributes documents which include its reports and basic documents. These documents include the Annual Report, the Special Reports on the human rights situation in given countries, the updated basic documents of the Inter-American Human Rights System, and on special occasions, studies, research, and special reports. It will also include, starting in 1998-1999, the “Annual Report on Freedom of Expression in the Americas”. These are published in the four working languages and are distributed to a mailing list of more than a thousand recipients (universities, governmental and judicial organs, associations, experts, human rights organizations, and the press). In special cases, these are also published in the traditional language of the population to which the report refers (in Creole for Haiti; in Miskito for the Nicaraguan people, for example).

Funding: Preparation, translation, publication and distribution of these documents are carried out with funds from the regular budget for the publication of decisions and documents of the IACHR through a) Annual Reports; b) special reports; c) updated basic documents.

b. Inter-American Human Rights Yearbook

(In execution)

Executing organ: IACHR, with Nijhoff Publishers, Holland.

Published currently, it includes a summary of all of the system’s decisions and documents.

Funding: The publisher is in charge of publication, with contributing funds from the regular budget of IACHR in exchange for issues of the publication.

c. Manual for journalists specializing in the handling of news on cases and proceedings of the inter-American system

(New activity)

Executing organ: IACHR

Objective: This program would be conducted with the aim of achieving greater journalistic accuracy and clarity on activities of the inter-American system. In principle, it would consist of a small manual for journalists to facilitate their work and avoid their being used as a vehicle for erroneous news which could affect the prestige of their medium and of the system. It will be supplemented, in the future, by a specialized course.

Funding: Requires additional funding. Estimate of cost: performance contract for the preparation of the manual and its publication in four languages: $40,000.

d. Program for public electronic access to the document base of the IACHR

(In execution)

Executive organ: CIDH

Objective: Make accessible via the Internet the reports and other public documents of the Commission and facilitate the search for jurisprudence in the system.

Characteristics: Electronic site for the Commission on the Internet where all the documents published by the Commission can be consulted. It is already in operation, containing the annual reports since 1990, and the special reports published in that period, to which new documents are being added as they are published. The document base will be supplemented in 1998-99 with documents prior to 1990, and will be connected with supplementary databases of the Washington School of Law, American University, and the Inter-American Court.

The IACHR site also has the ability to allow keyword searches, as well as direct correspondence with the Commission; it also provides links to other selected sites, in particular the OAS home page, where the system’s legal instruments, among others, are included. A direct link with the site for the Court and with IIHR are also anticipated.

e. Program for electronic access and for a guide to procedures to follow in dealing with the inter-American human rights system, containing its jurisprudence and basic doctrine, as well as those of the European and United Nations systems

(Proposal for new activity)

Executing organ: IIHR

Objective: Make available to potential claimants and officials a tool that will serve as a practical guide for participation before the enforcement organs, and to facilitate their professional job at the domestic headquarters.

Characteristics: Systematized and updated information on the instruments and mechanisms for the protection of human rights, which will be included in IIHR’s electronic site. Also, the updating of a compact disk which contains, in addition, information on the domestic law of the American countries, and other international instruments.

Funding: Regular budget of IIHR

f. Project for disseminating the IIHR book, “The Future of the Inter-American System for the Protection of Human Rights”

(In execution)

Executing organ: IIHR

Objective: To distribute this book, which was published in March of 1998 by the IIHR with contributions from the main experts (including present and former members and officials of IIHR), among users of the system, diplomats, officials of organizations, etc., as a contribution to the debate on possible reform of the system.

Funding: Regular budget of IIHR

g. IIHR Magazine (Nos. 27 and 28)

(In execution)

Executing organ: IIHR

Objectives: Provide information on the work of institutions connected with the inter-American human rights system, such as the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, and the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights. Disseminate information about the doctrine and mechanisms of the inter-American human rights system.

Characteristics: These are regular publications, published every six months.

Funding: IIHR’s regular budget

II. AREA ON STRENGTHENING OF NATIONAL INSTITUTIONS

General objective of Area: Strengthen national institutions (human rights offices of different ministries, and of defenders of the people, attorney general’s office, organs that oversee the security forces, judicial branch, schools of law, training schools for the armed forces and security forces, legal defense and human rights agencies, etc.) and their members, on general subjects of human rights and of procedures for resolving judicial and extrajudicial conflicts at the domestic and international level.

1. Program for horizontal cooperation in strengthening national institutions

a. OAS-IACHR program for horizontal cooperation on human rights

(New activity)

Executing organ: OAS Fellowships Department, with technical advice from the IACHR.

Characteristics: Program of exchange between national organizations, for training or assistance. For example, the Human Rights Commission or similar institutions and a particular country could fund internships for officials of other national commissions or similar institution and in this way different institutions could offer or request that cooperation through the existing mechanism of horizontal cooperation at OAS.

Funding: Requires special funding, by the entities participating in the exchange (whether as sponsor or as recipient).

b. Activities for training and strengthening of national human rights institutions (New activity)

Executing organ: Tentatively the IIHR, with the concurrence of III and CIM.

To be defined according to the interest of the countries and the abilities of the executing institutions. In principle, it could contain different projects:

· Training in investigation techniques on individual cases or issues, at both the national and international level.

· Training in specific subject areas of human rights: indigenous rights, gender rights, rights of minorities.

Operation and funding: If agreed upon by IIHR, it would become part of its system of programming and of requesting countries’ participation. On this basis, a working plan and priorities would be developed, as well as seeking funds for financing it.

In this respect, CIM, together with two agencies (one from the United Nations, the other being the Center for Criminal Policy and Penal Reform) will promote a project for judicial training schools. The project’s objective will be to develop courses for those schools, aimed at strengthening respect for human rights and contributing to the prevention and eradication of violence against women.

Funding: Will require special funding.

2. IIHR program of courses and seminars to strengthen national institutions

a. Annual Inter-American meeting for government experts

(New activity)

Executing organ: On a rotating basis, one of the National Human Rights Councils (or similar entity) of the participant countries, under the sponsorship of the IACHR.

Objective: Foster exchange of initiatives on human rights issues between the delegates of governmental entities directly responsible for promoting and disseminating information about human rights in each of the countries. The meeting will allow for disseminating information about various promotional projects that the states are developing, and provide ample opportunity to develop new types of cooperation among the participants. The meeting could become a forum in which the various projects to promote human rights are presented, for the purpose of debating their advantages, drawbacks, and results, with a view to identifying which projects are most effective in promoting respect for and defense of human rights, so that they can also be developed in other countries in the region.

Funding: Will require special funding.

b. Annual IIHR interdisciplinary course

(In execution)

Executing organ: IIHR

The first Interdisciplinary Course on Human Rights was conducted three years after the institute was created, in 1983, and has come to represent the main forum of this type in Latin America.

After it was held, and after confirming the interest of Latin Americans in participating, the necessity was seen for making the course an annual and permanent activity of IIHR, with a view to promoting human rights through the various organizations that work in this field, an initiative that has come to be IIHR’s most important one.

With this aim, the course was designed to identify certain needs of the region related to the promotion of human rights, make possible the exchange of experiences among the participants, make known the work carried out by IIHR in this field, and establish cooperative links among the former students of IIHR’s interdisciplinary courses, in order to facilitate the development of national programs.

The general objectives of the course are:

· To promote the doctrine of human rights in the American hemisphere, with the aim of supporting democratic processes in the region through a unique interdisciplinary and intersectoral setting.

· To collaborate on the consolidation of democracy in Latin America through education on human rights.

· To strengthen Latin American civil society, training its representatives and promoting links between them and the IIHR.

The activity plans to train 120 persons who in turn become, in a multiplicative way, agents. Thus, elements of gender, proportionality in terms of the different sectors of society, as well as profession, the region the person comes from, and work area, are taken into account. As a result of this, representatives from government institutions, nongovernmental organizations, international organizations, universities, officials from the judicial branch, members from the area of women, indigenous peoples, handicapped, human rights activists, and educators are chosen.

The course lasts two weeks, and methodologies such as conferences, round tables, workshops, case studies, areas of special emphasis, and optional activities, are used.

In the course of its fifteen consecutive runnings, 1782 people have been trained, and the demand keeps increasing. In 1997, 868 applications were received, among which 112 participants were selected.

Funding: Regular IIHR budget and special contributions.

c. Specialized regional courses on human rights

(In execution)

Executing organ: IIHR

As a way of channeling the large number of applications received for the interdisciplinary course, it was thought necessary to set up an annual specialized regional course which would have the same objectives as the interdisciplinary course, but emphasizing the needs of the region of Latin America being dealt with.

Starting with the first specialized course on human rights, there has been invaluable support from the European Commission. This first activity was conducted in Santafé de Bogotá, Colombia, in 1993, for the Andes region. It included participants from Bolivia, Colombia, Ecuador, Peru, and Venezuela.

In 1994, the second specialized course was conducted for participants from the Southern Cone, i.e., Argentina, Chile, Paraguay, and Uruguay, with headquarters in Santiago, Chile.

For 1995, the specialized regional course was devoted entirely to Brazil, for two basic reasons: first, because of the size of the country, in order to allow participants from the various regions to attend, and from the two distinct sectors of the society; and second, for language reasons. The proposal was welcomed by the University of Brasilia and the Brazilian Ministry of Justice, who were counterparts in the project. Other institutions that supported the development of the course were: the International Committee of the Red Cross, the United Nations High Commission for Refugees, the Organization of American States, the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development, and the Attorney General’s Office of the Republic.

In 1996, the course was devoted to the countries of Mexico and Central America, which make up a region united both historically and culturally. On this occasion, the offer to act as headquarters for the activity was extended to all of the countries involved, but it was Guatemala that responded quickest and most enthusiastically in welcoming the project. At the same time, the special political situation of the country was a determining factor in carrying out the course. In 1998, two were held: one in Barbados, the fifth regional seminar for the English-speaking Caribbean (June); and the second specialized regional course on human rights for the Andes region to be held in Caracas in November.

The course lasts for one week, and methodologies such as conferences, round tables, workshops, case studies, areas of special emphasis, and optional activities, are used.

Funding: It is executed with regular funds from the IIHR budget and outside contributions.

d. Administration of justice and human rights

(In execution)

Executing organ: IIHR

Objectives: To train officials of the judicial branch and from other agencies in the incorporation and enforcement of human rights in the administration of justice.

Characteristics: Seminars, workshops, and other training activities in the field of administration of justice. Officials from the judicial branch or from other agencies dealing with the incorporation and practice of human rights in judicial activities are trained. These meetings take place at various times during the year in different countries of Latin America, such as Argentina, Honduras, and Mexico.

Among the activities carried out during 1998, are the following:

· International forum on access to justice. (second half of the year)

· Courses on enforcement of human rights in the domestic realm. (March-May)

· Seminar on the judicial career. (Nicaragua) (May)

· Seminar on Organic law, judicial branch (Nicaragua) (April-June)

Funding: institutional funds and outside support.

e. Ombudsmen and human rights

(In execution)

Executing organ: IIHR

Objectives: To train officials in Latin American Offices of the defenders of the people and Offices of the Prosecutor for Human Rights, on human rights and on international protection instruments.

Characteristics: Through various activities held in different places on the continent during the year, officials of offices of the defenders of the people and of offices of the Prosecutor for Human Rights will be trained on the topic of human rights, from various perspectives, so that they can utilize the knowledge in their daily work.

Among other activities, the following can be cited:

· Ombudsman course at the Universidad de Alcalá de Henares. (March 9-17)

· III General Assembly of the Ibero-American Federation of Ombudsmen.

· (September)

· II Inter-American course on Parliamentary Commissioners and Human Rights. (September)

· Initiation courses for officials of the offices of the defenders of the people, implemented recently. (November)

Funding: IIHR’s regular budget

f. Workshop on human rights and legal guarantees

(New activity)

Executing organ: IIHR

Objectives: Promote, with a group of select members of the Commission on Constitutional and Juridical Affairs, of the Popular Power National Assembly in Cuba, a debate on the various options offered by comparative constitutional practice in Latin America as concerns legal human rights guarantees.

Characteristics: The Office of Investigation and Development is responsible for this activity, and it falls within a broader plan aimed at promoting and strengthening human rights in Cuba. It will be conducted in the month of September.

Funding: institutional and other funds.

g. Inter-American course, civil society and human rights

(New activity)

Executing organ: IIHR

Objectives: Make available to organizations in the private sector working in the area of promoting and protecting human rights, a place for exchanging experiences, academic updating, and fostering relationships of mutual collaboration.

Characteristics: This is an activity designed to train members of organizations in the private sector on various issues related to human rights, with the intention of reinforcing the work they are carrying out in this area. In addition, it aims to conduct workshops for exchange of experiences in which the participants can enhance their work through the work carried out by others, as well as foster cooperation and coordination among the agencies they represent.

Funding: institutional and other funds.

h. IIHR internship program

(In execution)

Executing organ: IIHR

Program of internships lasting six months or one year, for students from different disciplines of the social sciences involved in the study and development of human rights: law, psychology, sociology, political science, among others.

IIHR is in charge of selection, based on applications submitted by students, who must be backed by funding from an academic organization or an organization connected with the practice of human rights. Number of internships: Maximum of 5 per year.

Funding: Financed within the regular budget of IIHR

3. Strengthening program on issues related to women’s rights

a. CIM Seminars on strengthening of national entities on “legal aspects of the fight against domestic violence”

(New activity)

Executing organ: CIM

To be carried out in the countries that are not signatories to the Convention of Belém do Pará, and in those that have not sanctioned domestic violence laws. These would be advanced-level seminars and would be aimed at legislators, judges, medical and police personnel, with the aim of making them aware of the problem, the need for appropriate legislation, and support services for victims of domestic violence.

Funding: Requires special funding.

b. CIM program for journalists on the role of women in today’s society

(New activity)

Executing organ: CIM

Objective: Orientation program on issues of gender for journalists and leaders of the media, to hasten cultural change with regard to the role and function of women, and to prevent the spread of reprehensible practices and gender stereotypes.

Funding: Requires special funds.

c. Strengthening of national institutions regarding the nature of the impact of migration on the human rights of women

(New activity)

Executing organ: CIM

Objective: Put into practice the project outline developed by UNESCO, CIM, and the International Migration Institute, in order to measure the effect of migrations on women in different regions, so as to be able to confront their negative consequences, especially those resulting from the consequences of armed conflict.

Funding: Requires special funding.

d. Additional protocol. Working Document. Convention on the Elimination of all forms of Discrimination against Women

(In execution)

Executing organ: IIHR

Objectives: Offer information, analytical rigor, and juridical basis to those who are within the systems of protection, governmental women’s offices, and women’s organizations in the Caribbean and Latin America. By the same token, the working document aims to serve as a useful and effective tool in the hands of our countries’ diplomatic offices, which should participate in developing the Additional protocol of the Convention on the Elimination of all forms of Discrimination against Women, which will soon be presented for consideration by the General Assembly.

Characteristics: Document that provides information on the background of the debate and approval process for a preliminary draft of the Additional Protocol and some strategies to assure an effective commitment on the part of all sectors involved in the ratification and approval of this document. Published in March, containing 182 pages.

Funding: Institutional funds.

e. Gender and Human Rights

(In execution)

Executing organ: IIHR

Objectives: To train women in the field of education, promotion, and mechanisms for the protection of human rights, through the production of training materials or activities.

Characteristics: During the year, IIHR’s Program for Gender and Human Rights has organized a series of regional and national activities, such as seminars and training workshops, with the goal of promotion and education in human rights for various women’s groups. Also, production and distribution of educational material aimed at women from various sectors and work areas has been proposed.

Funding: institutional and other funds.

4. Program on human rights in the armed forces and security forces

a. Security forces

(In execution)

Executing organ: IIHR

Objectives: Introduce the issue of human rights as an integral part of the education of members of the security forces, through production of materials and conducting of training activities and technical assistance.

Characteristics: During 1998, IIHR has planned various activities aimed at introducing the topic of respect for human rights in the daily activity of the security forces. For this purpose, different work methodologies have been designed, ranging from the publication of materials to technical assistance and developing of training forums.

Funding: IIDH’s regular budget

5. Program on freedom of speech

a. Meeting on freedom of speech and responsibility of the media

(In execution)

Executing organ: IIHR

Objectives: Bring together professional journalists, jurists, and politicians, to debate the promotion of more modern rules for protecting freedom of speech in the Americas, including adapting professionally to the rule in article 13 of the Convention. It also includes topics such as the interference of journalism in the functioning of the justice system and that of other state institutions. Three seminars have been conducted in 1997 in Cartagena, Santa Cruz de la Sierra, and Antigua, Guatemala. It is anticipated that three more will be conducted in the biennium 98-99.

Funding: Requires partial funding of new activities for the biennium 98-99.

b. Seminars on free speech

(In execution)

Executing organ: IIHR

Objectives: Promote freedom in the responsible practice of the media as an essential condition of the right to freedom of speech.

Characteristics: It will be held in the second half of 1998, and among the topics to be discussed will be revision of legislation on freedom of speech and information. In addition, technical advice will be given to the Inter-American Press Society (SIP), for the revision of the declaration of Chapultepec on freedom of the press.

Funding: institutional funds and support from other funding sources.

c. Promotional activities on freedom of speech

(New activity)

Executing organ: IACHR

Objectives: Conduct courses, workshops, conferences, and seminars on freedom of speech and of the press in the Americas, and methods of protection.

Funding: Requires additional funding.

6. Program for electoral consultation and promotion

a. IIHR-CAPEL Electoral consultation and promotion

(In execution)

Executing organ: IIHR

Objectives: Strengthen development of the election process in Latin America and the Caribbean, through training and technical assistance for officials of electoral agencies and others related to this area.

Characteristics: The IIHR, through the Center for Electoral Consultation and Promotion (CAPEL), has a broad program of activities throughout Latin America and the Caribbean, ranging from technical assistance to conducting training courses and seminars on election issues and issues of human rights. In addition, this initiative aims to foster exchange and cooperation between the different electoral organizations of the continent.

Among the activities which have been planned for this year are:

· Second Ibero-American Seminar on Freedom of Speech. (April)

· Seminar on the System for the Election of Deputies. (April)

· XII Conference on the Protocol of Tikal

· Parliamentary Computer Network Seminar. (June)

· VII Conference on the Protocol of Quito. (August)

· IV conference of the Union of Electoral Organizations. (December)

In addition, observation missions in Costa Rica, Paraguay, Ecuador, Colombia, Brazil, Venezuela, and the Dominican Republic have been conducted or will be conducted.

Funding: IIHR’s regular budget

7. Program on prison systems and human rights

a. Prevention and treatment for victims of torture: Seminars about the prison systems in Central America

(In execution)

Executing organ: IIHR

Objectives: Promote scrutiny and reform of the prison systems, from a human rights perspective.

Characteristics: Training and advice for those connected with the prison systems, with the aim of promoting reform that is in line with international instruments and domestic legislation on human rights. During 1998, work in this field will focus on Central America, through regional and national activities.

Funding: institutional and other funds.

8. IIHR publications and dissemination program

a. IIHR publications and dissemination program on human rights

(In execution)

Executing organ: IIHR

Objective: Produce publications on special human rights topics, and distribute information on mechanisms, rules, activities, and doctrinal materials. IIHR regularly produces, publishes, and distributes publications (see appendix) for different populations.

Funding: Regular IIHR budget and special contributions.

b. Network for exchange and electronic dissemination of information on economic, social, and cultural rights.

(In execution)

Executing organ: IIHR

Objective: IIHR has maintained its own web page since 1997 in order to serve as a stimulus and as a network for NGOs throughout the continent on economic, social, and cultural rights and their treatment by international financial institutions, and related topics.

Funding: Regular IIHR budget and special contributions.

III. AREA ON EDUCATION AND GENERAL TRAINING IN HUMAN RIGHTS

General objective of this Area: Courses aimed essentially at the most vulnerable sectors of the population, and at creating a culture of respect for human rights, tolerance, and democracy in the overall population.

a. IIHR project for university education on human rights

(In execution)

Executing organ: IIHR

The IIHR has begun a technical assistance project for certain universities in Latin America which are incorporating human rights in their academic programs. Specifically, a general cooperation agreement has been signed with the Universidad Rafael Landivar, in Guatemala, by which collaboration is taking place in the implementing of their Masters in Human Rights, to begin in June of 1998.

Funding: The IIHR activity with the Universidad R. Landivar has funding. Expanding this line of projects would require special funding.

b. UPD program for education in human rights

(New activity, approved by the Permanent Council)

Executing organ: UPD (is an area of its working plan approved by the Permanent Council.)

Objective: Intended to expand citizens’ ability to assert their rights.

CIM, with the collaboration of the UPD, can promote the holding of conferences on the full and equal participation of women.

Funding: Requires additional funds. In its working plan for 1998, approved by the Permanent Council, the UPD envisions developing, in 1998, in collaboration with the IACHR, this program for which it is proposed that outside funds be sought. (OEA/Ser.G/ CP/doc.2995/97 p.6).

c. Program to incorporate human rights in the practices and curricula of formal national educational systems. (Expansion of a program currently in execution by IIHR and other agencies)

Executing organ: IIHR, with the potential cooperation of other institutions.

The IIHR has agreements with Ministries of Education in several countries, through which it advises in the design of human rights curricula, in order to incorporate the subject in study plans at the primary and secondary school level, and it collaborates in the same vein with teachers’ associations. Through its Educational Resource Center (CRE), it generates teaching materials and guides for their use by teachers; these have been adopted by the educational authorities in several countries. This part of the program relies on there being interest on the part of the countries, in accordance with their specific commitments. In this program, plans and projects can be structured for improving curricula, training teachers, and developing related techniques and materials. There already exist in the region many initiatives of this type, both on the part of National Ministries and of institutions and experts. the IIHR has, during 1997, been active in stimulating the compiling of and debate on these initiatives at the “Conference Exhibition on Education in Human Rights” held in Costa Rica in December of 1997.

In this area, the IIHR has planned the following activities for 1998:

· Technical assistance in education on human rights in Central America.

· Forum on education in human rights for Guatemala.

· Project on education, human rights, and democracy for Central America.

· Seminar on education in human rights in Venezuela.

· Session on the rights of children in Peru and Guatemala.

· Evaluation of Programs on education in human rights in Nicaragua.

· Project on education, human rights, and democracy for Peru.

· Project for education, human rights, and democracy for Mexico.

· Project for education, human rights, and democracy for Chile, Paraguay, and Uruguay.

· Publication and validation of UNESCO’s manual of education in human rights.

· Publication and validation of the CRE portfolio of teaching materials. Argentine version.

· United Nations Decade for Education project.

Funding: The activities already planned by IIHR have funding. Special funding is required to expand their scope according to demand by the countries.

d. Indigenous peoples and human rights

(In execution)

Executing organ: IIHR

Objectives: Carry out activities and national and regional meetings with the aim of training indigenous participants on human rights issues, as well as on domestic and international instruments and mechanisms of protection. In addition, promote and strengthen their political participation and the development of juridical standards.

Characteristics: Training activities designed to meet the particular needs of the indigenous peoples in different countries. They also seek to foster respect for the human rights of these peoples. During 1998, special attention will be given to the case of Guatemala, with activities that will be conducted during May, June, and October.

Funding: institutional and other funds.

e. Migrant populations affected by violence

(In execution)

Executing organ: IIHR

Objective: Study concentrations of migrant populations, observance of their human rights, and the situation with regard to citizen safety and crime.

Characteristics: Series of studies providing means to identify the main problems of migrant populations. In particular, the migrant experiences of women will be analyzed, as a form of survival strategy in the face of systematic human rights violations. The result of these studies will be of great importance for future initiatives for research, education, and prevention in this field.

Funding: institutional funds and other sources of financing.

f. Inter-American monograph competition

(New activity)

Executing organ: To be selected

Objectives: Organize a monograph competition open to all those interested, the topic being the importance of human rights in the building of a peaceful and democratic society. (Proposal of the government of Peru).

Funding: Would require special funding.

g. Competition for postgraduate grants in the specialized field of human rights

(New activity)

Executing organ: OAS Department of Grants

Competition for grants to carry out postgraduate studies in the specialized field of human rights and, in particular, financial support for research and editing of doctoral dissertations in the field of human rights. Persons receiving grants or some type of financial support through this competition could be required to commit themselves to presenting the results of their research at various congresses and conferences organized under this program, as a condition of the grant. (Proposal of the government of Peru.)

Funding: Would require special funding.

NOTES

i. American Declaration of the Rights and Duties of Man, 1st Preamble and art. XXIX.

ii. American Declaration of the Rights and Duties of Man. Considering 3.

iii. idem, Considering.

iv. cf. World Conference on Human Rights, Final Declaration, par. 12, 13, and 25, Vienna, 1993, (A. Conf.157/24 Part I. 1993), Declaration on the Rights of the Child I-25; American Convention on the Prevention, Punishment, and Eradication of Violence Against Women.

v. cf. World Conference on Human Rights, Final Declaration, I-5, Vienna, 1993.

vi. Summit of the Americas. Declaration of Principles , Miami, 1994.

vii. cf. World Conference on Human Rights, Final Declaration, I-10 and I-11, Vienna, 1993.

viii. cf. World Conference on Human Rights, Final Declaration, par. 8, Vienna, 1996, and Proposed American Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, Preamble, 4; Annual Report 1996 IACHR.

ix. cf. Proposed American Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, Art. 1. Annual Report 1996 IACHR.

x. cf. Inter-American Convention on the Prevention, Punishment, and Eradication of Violence Against Women, 3rd. Preamble. OAS 1994.

xi. cf. Declaration on the Rights of the Child. Principle 2. U.N. 1959.

xii. cf. World Conference on Human Rights, Final Declaration, I-27, Vienna, 1993.

xiii. cf. World Conference on Human Rights, Final Declaration, I-33, Vienna, 1993.

xiv. The Inter-American Commission, together with other OAS organs, in particular the Inter-American Juridical Committee and the CIM, have played a central role in the preparation of the main instruments of the inter-American system (i.e., the American Convention on Human Rights, itself, and its Protocols, the Conventions on Torture and on Forced Disappearances of Persons, on Violence Against Women, the Proposed Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, etc.).

			2000 (US $1,000)
CHAPTER 1 - GENERAL ASSEMBLY AND OTHER ORGANS			11,958.1
10A	General Assembly (thirtieth regular session) Administrative Tribunal sessions		180.6
10B			79.9
10D	Board of External Auditors		164.0
10E	Secretariat of the General Assembly, the Meeting of Consultation and the Permanent Council		1,076.3
10G	Secretariat of Conferences and Meetings		4,879.0
10H	Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission		173.4
10K	Meetings of the Inter-American Council for Integral Development		144.4
10L	Regional and subregional programming meetings		105.0
10N	Non-permanent Specialized Committees		137.9
10O	Inter-American Commission on Human Rights		2,987.5
10P	Inter-American Juridical Committee		446.9
10Q	Inter-American Court of Human Rights		1,114.9
10V	Inter-American Committees		83.0
10W	OAS Conferences (see Table C)		300.1
10X	Unprogrammed (see Table C)			85.2

CHAPTER 2 – SPECIALIZED ORGANIZATIONS AND OTHER ENTITIES			5,471.1
20A	Inter-American Defense Board		2,159.2
20B	Inter-American Children’s Institute		1,528.3
20C	Inter-American Commission of Women		931.4
20D	Pan American Development Foundation		173.5
20J	Inter-American Telecommunication Commission		678.7

CHAPTER 3 – EXECUTIVE OFFICES OF THE GENERAL SECRETARIAT			9,316.0
30A	Office of the Secretary General		2,094.7
30B	Office of the Assistant Secretary General		991.7
30C	Department of Public Information		1,980.1
30D	Department of Legal Services		869.0
30E	Office of the Inspector General		695.1
30F	Museum of Art of the Americas		521.3
30G	Columbus Memorial Library		993.9
30H	Protocol Office		453.8
30I	Official Functions (SG/SGA/PC)		53.3
30J	Office of External Relations		328.8
30K	Office of Summit Follow-up		334.3
CHAPTER 4 – UNITS AND SPECIALIZED OFFICES			21,424.0
40A	Trade Unit		1,730.8
40B	Foreign Trade Information System (SICE)		429.6
41C	Unit for the Promotion of Democracy		3,493.2
42D	Intersectoral Tourism Unit and Caribbean Tourism Organization		729.2
43A	Executive Office of CICAD		1,653.4
44E	Unit for Sustainable Development and Environment		1,430.2
46F	Unit for Social Development and Education		1,381.4
47G	Office of Cultural Affairs		565.9
48H	Office of Science and Technology		961.6
49M	Department of Fellowships		9,048.7
CHAPTER 5 – EXECUTIVE SECRETARIAT FOR INTEGRAL DEVELOPMENT			2,779.1
55A	Office of the Executive Secretary for Integral Development		648.9
56A	Division of Operations and Technical Support Services		769.1
57A	Division of Planning and Evaluation		889.1
58A	Division of Program and Project Coordination		472.0
59X	Unprogrammed CIDI Cooperation Activities	0.0
CHAPTER 6 – OFFICES OF THE GENERAL SECRETARIAT IN THE MEMBER STATES			6,298.4
60G	Offices of the General Secretariat in the Member States		6,298.4

CHAPTER 7 – SECRETARIAT FOR LEGAL AFFAIRS			1,984.4
70A	Office of the Assistant Secretary for Legal Affairs		411.9
70B	Department of International Law		970.8
70G	Secretariat of the Administrative Tribunal		192.4
70H	Department of Cooperation and Legal Dissemination		409.3
CHAPTER 8 – SECRETARIAT FOR MANAGEMENT			9,839.3
80M	Office of the Assistant Secretary for Management		315.9
80N	Department of Financial Services		2,053.1
80P	Department of Program-Budget		1,144.9
80Q	Department of Material Resources		2,997.4
80R	Department of Human Resources		1,571.3
80S	Department of Management Systems and Information Technology		1,756.7

CHAPTER 9 – COMMON SERVICES			8,929.6
90B	Computer equipment and supplies		411.5
90C	Equipment and supplies		45.4
90D	Building management and maintenance		4,482.5
90E	General insurance		250.5
90F	Post audits		125.0
90G	Recruitment and transfers		168.8
90H	Terminations and repatriations		976.4
90I	Home leave		192.6
90J	Education and language allowance, medical examinations		127.0
90K	Pension for retired executives and health and life Insurance for retired employees		1,801.6
90L	Human resources development		121.4
90M	Contribution to the Staff Association		10.0
90Q	Management systems		216.9

II. FINANCING OF THE BUDGET APPROPRIATIONS

1. To set the quotas with which the governments of the member states will finance the program-budget of the Organization for the year 2000 corresponding to the Regular Fund, in accordance with resolution AG/RES. 1073 (XX-O/90) and the decision of January 19, 1955 (doc.C-I-269) on income tax reimbursements, using the scale and amounts shown in Table B.

2. To finance the year 2000 budget of the Regular Fund with the quotas of the member states, estimated interest income, rental income from space in the General Secretariat Building, and administrative and technical support contributions from the voluntary and specific funds, and all other miscellaneous income.

3. To authorize contributions for the voluntary fund portion of the program-budget of the Organization at the level approved for programming in the year 2000 by CEPCIDI for execution in 2001.

III. GENERAL PROVISIONS

A. BUDGETARY

1. Personnel

a. To continue the ceiling set for 1999-2000 on the number of posts financed by the program-budget of the Organization at 587.

b. To urge the Secretary General to observe the limit of 50% for personnel costs in object 1.a of the total of the Regular Fund and Voluntary Fund appropriations.

c. To instruct the Secretary General to ensure that, in executing the budget, early separations, transfers, and reassignment of personnel are carried out in such a manner as to not adversely affect the approved programs.

2. Quota Payments

To urge member states to pay in full their quota arrears, or alternatively they submit to the General Secretariat a payment plan for their arrears before January 1, 2000.

3. Specific Funds

a. In order to respond to the External Auditor's observation regarding the need to secure contributions from the Specific Funds to support the administrative and technical support incurred by the Regular Fund and FEMCIDI in relation to those Funds, to modify Article 72 of the General Standards as follows:

Article 72. Bank deposits and interest. The Secretary General shall designate the banking institutions in which the funds of the Organization shall be deposited. Interest received on such funds shall be considered as income of the corresponding fund; however, for each specific fund which is not governed by a donor agreement dictating how interest on the fund shall be credited, all such interest shall be credited to the corresponding fund (i.e. Regular Fund or FEMCIDI), for use in the administration of specific funds. The annual Financial Report of the General Secretariat to the Permanent Council shall state how the interest from each Specific Fund has been credited.

This modification shall remain in force indefinitely until otherwise modified or derogated.

b. To instruct the General Secretariat to complete a cost accounting system in order to document the costs of support services to specific funds so that once those costs have been documented and established, the Permanent Council may authorize charges for those services.

4. Financing Meetings Away from Headquarters with the OAS Regular Fund

To reiterate to the Permanent Council and the General Secretariat that, pursuant to AG/RES. 3 (XXV-E/98), the Regular Fund of the Organization will not be used to finance meetings in member states unless the member state is current in its payment of quotas to the Regular Fund or has established a schedule of payments with the General Secretariat and is complying with that schedule.

5. Travel

To instruct the Secretary General to continue with the policy to reduce travel costs and, whenever possible, reserve airline tickets at least 28 days in advance to ensure the lowest possible fares.

6. Conference Services

To instruct the General Secretariat to ensure that the resources assigned to the activities included in subprogram 10G Secretariat of Conferences and Meetings provide equitable services in support of all the bodies of the OAS, in accordance with resolution CP/RES. 718 (1150/98).

7. Contributions to the Regular Fund for Technical Supervision and Administrative Support from FEMCIDI and Other Funds

To request the Permanent Council to present its conclusions to the next regular session of the General Assembly on the study requested by resolution AG/RES. 1531 (XXVII-O/97) on comparing the administrative costs for technical supervision and administrative support to FEMCIDI and other funds of the OAS with those of other organizations and international cooperation agencies since 1990.

8. Studies in International Law

To instruct the General Secretariat to ensure that the resources assigned to the activity “Studies” included in subprogram 70B are utilized for studies by recognized experts on specific issues of juridical interest which will be defined by the Permanent Council in keeping with resolution AG/RES. 1471 (XXVII-O/97).

9. Offices in the Member States

To instruct the Secretary General to redouble his efforts to negotiate with the governments of the member states a 15% reduction in the overall cost of the national offices, where appropriate, taking into account, in particular, the costs of rent and security.

10. Overtime

To instruct the Secretary General to pay overtime in compensatory leave, as much as possible, in accordance with Staff Rule 103.8(e).

11. Unused Appropriations

To instruct the Permanent Council and the Secretary General that beginning January 1, 2000 unused appropriations may only be re-appropriated if they are fully funded with cash at the time they lapse into the Reserve Subfund. Unused appropriations unfunded at the time they lapse may not be used for any purpose. For programs specifically funded with unused appropriations, the Secretariat must show the Permanent Council that at the time the appropriations lapsed they were fully backed with cash. If that cannot be shown, then the Secretary General must ask the Permanent Council for specific authority to disburse from current funds.

12. Tributes to Departing Permanent Representatives

To implement the proposal of the Secretary General contained in CP/doc.3153/99 in order to reduce the cost of tributes to the departing permanent representatives.

13. Use of Conference and Meeting Facilities at Headquarters

a. To instruct the General Secretariat that during April and May priority should be given to meetings at headquarters related to preparation of the General Assembly. Other meetings should be scheduled before April 1 or after the regular session of the General Assembly.

b. To ask the General Secretariat to work closely with the chairs of the councils and their subsidiary bodies in order to implement the necessary measures to maximize the use of resources, both budgetary and time, and report to the councils on these on a quarterly basis.

14. Performance Contracts

To instruct the General Secretariat to submit to the Permanent Council every six months a report on CPR's funded by the Regular Fund. This report should include the source of funds used, the name of the CPR, the time frame of the contract, the amount of the contract, the area of the Secretariat requiring the CPR and a detailed justification for the need as well as a statement why on-board personnel cannot accomplish the task for which the CPR is needed.

The Permanent Council, through its Committee on Administrative and Budgetary Affairs, should examine the report on the CPRs, along with the results of the Working Group on Personnel Policy, in light of what the Organization should be doing and the mandates assigned to it.

15. Renovation Plan for the General Secretariat Building

To authorize the Permanent Council to approve a plan for the renovation of the General Secretariat Building that would permit more effective and efficient use of space by the General Secretariat and improve the value of the space that could be rented to third parties. The cost of the renovations shall be financed by a renewed mortgage on the building and this mortgage shall be amortized with the current level of appropriation for the mortgage on the building together with rental income from the space rented.

16. Américas Magazine

a. To instruct the General Secretariat to report all proceeds from the sale of the magazine during the year 2000 as income of the Organization and to include it in the proposed program-budget.

b. To authorize the General Secretariat to use any contribution it receives for the Magazine to publish it in the four official languages of the Organization, as a matter of priority.

c. To instruct the General Secretariat to give prior approval for all the magazine’s activities that requires use of the franking privilege.

d. To reaffirm that the editorial policy of the magazine shall be established by its Editorial Board, which shall ensure that the magazine, as an official publication of the OAS, gives particular attention to promoting the activities of the Organization, as outlined in Article 111 of the Charter.

17. OAS Conferences (10W)

a. To approve funding for items 2 and 4 of Subprogram 10W for 2000 (see Table C), requesting the Special Joint Working Group of the Permanent Council and the Inter-American Council for Integral Development on the Strengthening and Modernization of the OAS to study the criteria for convoking future meetings referred to in these items.

b. To also instruct the Special Joint Working Group of the Permanent Council and the Inter-American Council for Integral Development on the Strengthening and Modernization of the OAS to establish a policy framework for the frequency, duration, and services offered to ministerial meetings held under the auspices of the OAS.

18. Unprogrammed Funds (10X)

To instruct the Permanent Council to establish criteria for the use of subprogram 10X, Unprogrammed Funds (see Table C).

B. OTHER

1. Honoraria and Per Diem

a. To maintain the sum of $150 a day for honoraria paid to members of the following bodies entitled to such compensation: Administrative Tribunal, Board of External Auditors, Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, Inter-American Juridical Committee, and Inter-American Court of Human Rights.

b. The General Secretariat is authorized to pay the Chairman of the Human Rights Commission per diem and honorarium from the approved budget of the Commission in accordance with rates and rules of the General Secretariat when the Chairman is performing work of the Commission. However, a President serving as a “Resident President at Headquarters” will not be paid per diem for days worked in Washington, D.C., if he or she is domiciled within the Greater Washington Metropolitan Area or had established residence there within one year prior to assuming office.

2. Permanent Observer States

To invite the Permanent Observer states to contribute to the financing of the programs and projects of the Organization.

3. Program-Budget for 2001

a. To instruct the Secretary General to submit a draft program-budget for the Regular Fund for the year 2001 at an indicative level no higher than US$80,000,000, provided that the General Secretariat can finance it with revenues as defined in Section II.2. of this resolution. Should the General Secretariat obtain financing over this approved level, these funds should go into the Reserve Subfund until it reaches the level prescribed by the General Standards.

b. To instruct the Secretary General and Preparatory Committee of the General Assembly to include in the proposed program-budget an unprogrammed amount for the funding of new mandates arising out of the plenary of the General Assembly.

c. To instruct the Preparatory Committee to require that all resolutions transmitted to the plenary of the General Assembly for approval be accompanied by an opinion on the corresponding budgetary implications so that those implications may be duly considered in the Organization’s year 2001 budget. In this regard, the General Secretariat is requested to instruct the technical secretaries at the committees to complete the required forms, developed by the General Secretariat in consultation with the CAAP, and forward them, along with the proposed resolution, to the Department of Program-Budget for consideration by CAAP, not later than 30 days before the General Assembly or by such earlier date as may be established by the Preparatory Committee. Any resolution not previously reviewed by the Preparatory Committee or by such other committee that may be established for that purpose may not be considered by the plenary unless accompanied by the corresponding opinion on budgetary implications.

d. To instruct the Secretary General, in preparing the program-budget, to consult with the Permanent Council regarding the criteria and basic information to be contained in the draft program-budget in accordance with Article 88 of the General Standards.

e. To urge the member states to make a decision on whether to adopt a new scale of quotas in accordance with resolution AG/RES. 1594 (XXVIII-O/98).

f. To instruct the Secretary General to take immediate action towards the formulation of the program-budget of the Organization, on the basis of the corresponding mandates and programs, and to inform the Permanent Council, through its Committee on Administrative and Budgetary Affairs, on a quarterly basis as to its progress.

1. In the “additional information” column, States Parties may wish to provide voluntary additional information such as designation, model, or any other information considered relevant. States Parties may also wish to use the “additional information” column to explain or clarify aspects relevant to the acquisition.

States Parties that do not have anything to report should file a “nil” report clearly stating that no imports have taken place in any of the categories during the calendar year.

2. In the “additional information” column, States Parties may wish to provide voluntary additional information such as designation, model, or any other information considered relevant. States Parties may also wish to use the “additional information” column to explain or clarify aspects relevant to the export.

States Parties that do not have anything to report should file a “nil” report clearly stating that no exports have taken place in any of the categories during the calendar year.

3. In the “additional information” column, States Parties may wish to provide voluntary additional information such as designation, model, or any other information considered relevant. States Parties may also wish to use the “additional information” column to explain or clarify aspects relevant to the acquisition.

4. In the “additional information” column, States Parties may wish to provide voluntary additional information such as designation, model, or any other information considered relevant. States Parties may also wish to use the “additional information” column to explain or clarify aspects relevant to the acquisition.

1. When the Statute of the Inter-American Agency for Cooperation and Development (IACD) comes into force, this mandate will correspond to the Inter-American Council for Integral Development (CIDI).

1. The delegation of Trinidad and Tobago said that it would not support the consensus on operative paragraph 11 of this resolution.

A. CONVENTIONAL WEAPONS	B. QUANTITY	C. TYPE	D. EXPORTING STATE	E. Additional information[1]^/
I. BATTLE TANKS
II. ARMORED COMBAT VEHICLES
III. LARGE-CALIBER ARTILLERY SYSTEMS
IV. COMBAT AIRCRAFT
V. ATTACK HELICOPTERS
VI. WARSHIPS
VII. MISSILES AND MISSILE LAUNCHERS

A. CONVENTIONAL WEAPONS	B. QUANTITY	C. TYPE	D. IMPORTING STATE	E. Additional information[2]^/
I. BATTLE TANKS
II. ARMORED COMBAT VEHICLES
III. LARGE-CALIBER ARTILLERY SYSTEMS
IV. COMBAT AIRCRAFT
V. ATTACK HELICOPTERS
VI. WARSHIPS
VII. MISSILES AND MISSILE LAUNCHERS

BUDGETARY APPROPRIATIONS		TOTAL	REGULAR FUND	VOLUNTARY FUND

1.	GENERAL ASSEMBLY AND OTHER ORGANS	11,958.1	11,958.1
2.	SPECIALIZED ORGANIZATIONS AND OTHER ENTITIES	5,471.1	5,471.1
3.	EXECUTIVE OFFICES OF THE GENERAL SECRETARIAT	9,316.0	9,316.0
4.	UNITS AND SPECIALIZED OFFICES	21,424.0	21,424.0
5.	EXECUTIVE SECRETARIAT FOR INTEGRAL DEVELOPMENT	12,935.2	2,779.1	10,156.1
6.	OFFICES OF THE GENERAL SECRETARIAT IN THE MEMBER STATES	6,298.4	6,298.4
7.	SECRETARIAT FOR LEGAL AFFAIRS	1,984.4	1,984.4
8.	SECRETARIAT FOR MANAGEMENT	9, 839.3	9,839.3
9.	COMMON SERVICES	8,929.6	8,929.6

	TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS	88,156.1	78,000.0	10,156.1

GENERAL ASSEMBLY

VOLUME I

GENERAL ASSEMBLY

TWENTY-NINTH REGULAR SESSION

PROCEEDINGS

ARTICLE I

OBJECTIVE

CONFERENCES OF THE STATES PARTIES

Bold items are mandatory.

Clarification from the Delegation of Argentina

I. OBJECTIVES

II. ACTIVITIES

Chapter I

Article 1

Article 2

Article 3

Article 4

Article 5

Article 7

Article 8

Chapter IV

Article 9

Article 11

Article 12

Article 13

Article 14

Article 15

Article 16

Article 18

Article 19

Article 20

Article 21

Article 22

Article 23

Article 24

Article 25

Article 26

Article 27

Article 28

II. AREA ON STRENGTHENING OF NATIONAL INSTITUTIONS

AG/RES. 1684 (XXIX-O/99)

I. BUDGET APPROPRIATIONS

II. FINANCING OF THE BUDGET APPROPRIATIONS

2. Quota Payments

8. Studies in International Law

B. OTHER

TOTAL