THE CITIZEN AND THE LAW
It is important to understand that every Canadian is part of the
justice system, and that justice is not only the business of
police, lawyers, judges and lawmakers. Individual citizens must
play their part in the justice system if the law is to work and
justice is to be done.
Jury Duty
The jury is one of the oldest institutions of our criminal
justice system. It entitles those who have been charged with a
criminal offence to be tried by a group of fellow citizens. In
Canada, a jury is made up of 12 persons who have been selected from
among citizens of the province or territory in which the court is
located. The precise method of selecting citizens for jury duty is
determined by the laws of the various provinces. Generally, the
qualifications for jury duty are Canadian citizenship and age of
majority.
Although most cases in Canada are tried by judges without a
jury, the Charter states that any person who is charged with a
criminal offence for which there can be a prison sentence of five
years or more has the right to a trial by jury. In some cases, a
person who is charged with a criminal offence for which there can
be a prison sentence of less than five years may have a right to
choose a trial by jury. In some jurisdictions, some civil cases can
also be tried by judge and jury.
A citizen who is called for jury duty is obliged to attend,
unless excused by the laws of the province. Being called for jury
duty does not necessarily mean that a person will be selected to
serve as a juror; either the prosecutor or the defence counsel may
object to the choice of a particular juror if they believe there is
a reason why he or she should be disqualified.
In the course of the trial, jurors must not allow themselves to
be influenced by anything except the evidence presented in court.
Jurors must make up their own minds about the accuracy or honesty
of the testimony given by witnesses in the trial. Finally, when
both sides have called their witnesses and presented their
arguments, and the judge has instructed the jury on the law and on
what they must take into account when making their decision, the
jurors meet by themselves in a room outside the courtroom. This is
where they must decide: in a criminal case, whether the prosecution
has proven beyond a reasonable doubt that the accused person
is guilty; or in a civil case, whether the plaintiff has proven
on a balance of probabilities that the defendant is
liable.
Regardless of the jury's verdict, it must be unanimous. That is,
the jurors must all agree on it. If they cannot agree, the judge
may discharge the jury, freeing them from further duties, and
direct that a new jury be empanelled. After the trial, no juror is
permitted to inform other people about the discussions that took
place in the jury room.
Testifying in Court
A person may be called to give evidence in a civil or criminal
trial because he or she has information that either party in the
case believes to be useful. For example, someone might have
witnessed an offence, know something that is important to the case,
or possess a key document. A person may also be called as an
"expert witness". An expert witness is a person whose knowledge
about a particular subject can help the court obtain answers to
technical questions.
Usually, persons come forward voluntarily when they have
information that they believe is related to the case. An individual
may also be summoned by "subpoena" to give evidence in court. A
subpoena is a command by the court to testify, whether or not the
person has volunteered. It is used when the prosecution, plaintiff,
accused or defendant wishes to call a person as a witness in the
trial. Persons have a duty to testify in court when required to do
so, and a person subpoenaed must comply with the order or face a
penalty.
Witnesses' testimony is taken under oath or by affirmation.
Witnesses are required to answer all questions they are asked,
unless the judge decides that a question need not be answered for
some reason: for example, because it is irrelevant. Testifying in
court is essential to making Canada's justice system work as it
should.
Knowing the Law
Individuals do not have to be experts in the law: that is the
responsibility of lawyers. However, in our system of law, ignorance
of the law is no defence. This means that persons charged with
offences cannot be excused simply by claiming that they did not
know they were breaking the law, although the court will consider
honest mistakes of fact. Further, because our laws are publicly
debated before being passed in Parliament or a provincial
legislature, the public is expected to know what is permitted and
what is not.
Knowing the law means that citizens should take reasonable steps
to be sure they are acting legally. Information is available from
federal and provincial government offices, public libraries, and
the police. If, after consulting these sources of information, a
person is still uncertain about the law, then a lawyer should be
consulted.
|