SOURCES OF CANADIAN LAW
English Law and the Code Napoléon
Canada's present legal system derives from various European
systems brought to this continent in the 17th and 18th centuries by
explorers and colonists. Although the indigenous peoples whom the
Europeans encountered here each had their own system of laws and
social controls, over the years the laws of the encroaching
immigrant cultures began to prevail. After the English defeat of
the French at Quebec in 1759, the country fell almost exclusively
under English law. Except for Quebec, where the civil law is based
on the French Code Napoléon, Canada's criminal and civil law
has its basis in English common and statutory law.
The common law, which developed in Great Britain after the
Norman Conquest, was based on the decisions of judges in the royal
courts. It is called judge-made law because it is a system of rules
based on "precedent". Whenever a judge makes a decision that is to
be legally enforced, this decision becomes a precedent: a rule that
will guide judges in making subsequent decisions in similar cases.
The common law is unique in the world because it cannot be found in
any "code" or "legislation"; it exists only in past decisions.
However, this also makes it flexible and adaptable to changing
circumstances.
The tradition of civil law is quite different. It is based on
Roman law, which was consolidated by the Roman Emperor
Justinian. The law in ancient Rome was scattered about in many
places: in books, in statutes, in proclamations. Justinian ordered
his legal experts to put all the law into a single book to avoid
confusion. Ever since, the civil law has been associated with a
"civil code", containing almost all private law. Quebec's Civil
Code was first enacted in 1866, just before Confederation, and
after periodic amendments, was recently revised. Like all civil
codes, such as the Code Napoléon in France, it contains a
comprehensive statement of rules, many of which are framed as
broad, general principles so as to deal with any dispute that may
arise. Unlike common-law courts, courts in a civil-law system first
look to the Code, and then refer to previous decisions for
consistency.
When discussing the law as it pertains to aboriginal people in
Canada it is also necessary to consider aboriginal rights and
treaty rights which are protected under the Constitution.
Aboriginal rights are those related to the historical occupancy and
use of the land by aboriginal peoples; treaty rights are those set
out in treaties entered into between the Crown and a particular
group of aboriginal people.
Law Reform: An Endless Cycle
Although much of our law has been inherited from European legal
traditions, as society grows and develops it cannot rely entirely
on tradition. Sometimes there is an urgent need for new laws, or
for old laws to be changed, and the common law and civil law may
evolve too slowly to meet this need. So, even as government
ponderously enacts reforms designed to address changing ethics and
morality, society continues to evolve dynamically ahead of the
lawmakers, necessitating a never-ending cycle of law reform.
Making New Laws: Legislation
Democratic countries usually have what is called a "legislature"
or "parliament", which has the power to make new laws or change old
laws. In its political structure, Canada is a federation: a union
of several provinces, with a central government. So, it has both a
parliament in Ottawa to make laws for all of Canada, and a
legislature in each province and territory to deal with local
matters. Laws created at either level are called "statutes",
"legislation", or "acts". When Parliament or a provincial
legislature passes a statute, that statute takes the place of
common law dealing with the same subject. In Quebec, much
legislation exists to deal with specific problems not dealt with in
the Civil Code.
Making laws through legislation can be a complicated process.
Suppose, for example, the federal government wanted to create a law
that would help control pollution. First, government ministers or
senior public servants would be asked to examine the problem
carefully and suggest ways in which, under federal jurisdiction, a
law could deal with pollution. Next, a draft of the proposed law
would be made. This text would then have to be approved by the
Cabinet, which is composed of members of Parliament chosen by the
Prime Minister. This version would then be presented to Parliament
as a "bill", and would be studied and debated by members. Bills
only become laws if they are approved by a majority in both the
House of Commons and the Senate, and assented to by the Governor
General in the name of the Queen.
A similar process is used in every province to make laws. Laws
enacted by provincial legislatures are assented to by the
Lieutenant Governor.
Because of the complexity of modern society, more laws are made
today than ever before. If our lawmakers had to deal with all
details of all laws, the task would be nearly impossible. To solve
this problem, Parliament and provincial legislatures often pass
general laws delegating authority to make more specific laws called
"regulations". Regulations serve to carry out the purposes of or
expand on the general laws but are limited in scope by such
laws.
The Constitution
In a democracy with a written constitution, legislators cannot
make any laws they wish. A country's constitution, among other
things, defines the powers and limits of powers that can be
exercised by the different levels of government.
In many countries formed by revolution or some act of
independence -- the United States, for example -- the preponderance
of constitutional law is contained in a single document, usually
referred to as "the constitution". In Canada's case, however, the
country was formed by an act of the Parliament of Great Britain;
consequently, it does not have a "constitution" per se. The closest
thing to a constitutional document would be the British North
America Act, 1867, by which the British colonial provinces of
Canada (Upper and Lower), Nova Scotia and New Brunswick were united
to create the Dominion of Canada.
Even so, although there is no single "constitution" in Canadian
law, the Constitution Act, 1982, which is Schedule "B" to
the Canada Act, 1982 -- by which Canada's constitution was
finally patriated from Great Britain -- contains a definition of
the constitution. Section 52 of the Act declares the Constitution
of Canada to be the supreme law of Canada and states that it
includes an itemized list of some 30 acts and orders enumerated in
an attached schedule.
Confederation of the provinces into the Dominion of Canada did
not involve any break with the Imperial government. The new country
was still part of the British Empire, governed by authority
appointed by the monarch on the advice of the British Colonial
Secretary at Westminster. Far from codifying a new set of
constitutional rules for Canada, the BNA Act did little more than
provide for confederation, not even having the inclusion of an
amending clause. For this reason, until 1982 any necessary
amendments to the BNA Act were enacted by the Parliament in
England.
The Constitution sets out the basic principles of democratic
government in Canada. It also defines the powers of the three
branches of government: the executive, the legislative and the
judicial.
The executive power in Canada is vested in the Queen. But in our
democratic society, it is a constitutional convention reflected in
our fundamental laws that the real executive power rests with the
Cabinet, which consists at the federal level of the Prime Minister
and a number of ministers who are all answerable to Parliament for
various government activities. As well, individual ministers are
responsible for various government departments, such as the
Department of Finance and the Department of Justice. When we say
"the government" in a general way, we are usually referring to the
executive.
The legislature, which at the federal level in Canada is called
"Parliament", is made up of the House of Commons, the Senate, and
the monarch. Most laws in Canada are first examined and discussed
by the Cabinet, then presented for debate and approval by members
of the House of Commons and the Senate.
Before a bill becomes a law, the Queen or her representative,
the Governor General, must "assent" to it. The same is true in each
province, except that the Queen's provincial representative is
called the Lieutenant Governor. The requirement of royal assent
does not mean that the Queen is politically powerful: it is a
constitutional convention that the monarch always follows the
advice of the government.
Our constitution also provides for a "judiciary", which means
the judges who preside over cases before the courts. The
Constitution expressly provides only for federally appointed
judges; provincial judges are appointed to office under provincial
laws. The role of the judiciary is to interpret and apply the law
and the Constitution, and to give impartial judgments in all cases,
whether they involve public law, such as a criminal case, or
private law, such as a dispute over a contract.
The Federal System
The Constitution defines a federal system of government for
Canada. This means that the authority or "jurisdiction" to make
laws is divided between the Parliament of Canada and the provincial
legislatures. Parliament can make laws for the whole of Canada with
respect to matters assigned to it by the Constitution. A provincial
legislature, likewise, can make laws that come within the subject
matter over which it has been assigned jurisdiction. But these laws
are only effective within the province's borders. A number of other
countries, such as Australia and the United States, also have
federal systems. Jurisdiction in those countries is divided between
the federal government and the various states. By contrast, Great
Britain does not have a federal system; its Parliament has sole
authority to pass laws for the entire country.
The Canadian Constitution gives the provinces authority to make
laws concerning such matters as education, property, the
administration of justice, hospitals, municipalities and other
matters of a local and private nature within the provinces.
The federal Parliament deals, for the most part, with issues
concerning Canada as a whole, such as trade between provinces,
national defence, criminal law, money, patents and the postal
service.
As well, the federal Parliament has responsibility for Yukon
Territory and the Northwest Territories. To ensure that the people
in the territories can govern themselves on local matters, as the
citizens of a province can, federal law provides for elected
territorial councils with the power (similar to provincial powers)
to pass laws.
There are also local or municipal governments. They are created
under provincial laws and can make by-laws dealing with a variety
of local matters, such as parking regulations and the issuance of
construction permits.
Finally, particular arrangements have been developed for
aboriginal peoples in the various regions of Canada. For example,
Indian bands can exercise a range of governmental powers over
reserve lands under the Indian Act. There are also
several examples of aboriginal governments which exercise
governmental powers as a result of specific agreements negotiated
with the federal and provincial governments.
The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
In Canada, protection of the individual's rights and freedoms is
a subject of both federal and provincial jurisdiction. The
territorial governments also may legislate to protect human rights,
since the federal government has delegated to them the powers to do
so.
The Canadian Bill of Rights, which was passed
in 1960, was the first federal legislative enactment to
specifically set out fundamental human rights for Canadians. The
Canadian Human Rights Act (CHRA), which was first
enacted in 1977, also protects human rights, particularly in the
areas of employment, the provision of accommodation, and commercial
premises. Unlike the Bill of Rights, the CHRA applies not only to
the federal government but also to the private sector.
All provinces and territories also have human rights legislation
that prohibits discrimination on various grounds with regard to
employment matters and the provision of goods, services and
facilities. This legislation applies to discrimination by
individuals in the private sector and by provincial or territorial
governments.
The protection provided by all of the above-mentioned
legislation is limited. Because the Bill of Rights, the CHRA, and
all provincial human rights codes are only statutes, they are
always subject to repeal. It was not until the advent of the
Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms that human
rights in Canada were expressly protected in the Constitution.
When the Constitution was patriated in 1982, the
Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms became a
fundamental part of our Constitution. The Charter applies to the
provincial legislatures as well as to Parliament. The Charter is
paramount over other legislation because it is "entrenched" in the
Constitution and is the supreme law of Canada. This means that when
an individual who believes that Parliament or a legislature has
violated guaranteed rights asks the courts for help, the courts may
declare the law in question to be invalid insofar as it conflicts
with the Charter. In addition, courts may provide other appropriate
remedies to individuals whose rights have been infringed.
However, the Charter also recognizes that, in a democracy,
rights and freedoms are not absolute. For instance, freedom of
expression is guaranteed, but no one is free to yell "fire" in a
crowded theatre, to slander someone or to spread hate propaganda.
In Canada, Parliament or a provincial legislature can limit
fundamental rights, but only if that government can establish that
the limit is reasonable, is prescribed by law, and can be justified
in a free and democratic society. This allows for the balancing of
the interests of society against the interests of individuals to
determine if limits on individual rights can be justified.
Under the agreement between the federal and provincial
governments that resulted in the Constitution Act,
1982, both Parliament and the provincial legislatures
retain a limited power to pass laws that may violate certain
Charter rights. Many believe that such a provision is consistent
with our democratic principles because it gives the legislatures,
whose members are elected, the last word, as opposed to the
unelected judiciary. Nonetheless, it is limited in that Parliament
or a provincial legislature must specifically declare that it is
passing a law "notwithstanding" specified provisions of the
Charter. Further, the declaration must be reviewed and re-enacted
at least every five years; otherwise, it will not remain in force.
These conditions act as a kind of warning to Canadians, and force
the government that is invoking the notwithstanding clause to
explain itself, to accept full responsibility for its actions, and
to take the political consequences.
The Charter protects our rights and freedoms in the following
areas.
Fundamental Freedoms The Charter
constitutionally protects certain fundamental freedoms that custom
and law over the years had made almost universal in our country.
Everyone in Canada has a right to practise any religion or no
religion at all. We are free to speak our minds, to gather
peacefully into groups and to associate with whomever we wish, as
long as we do not infringe the legal and constitutional rights of
others. Unlike the situation that exists in many totalitarian
countries, the freedom of the media to print and broadcast news and
other information is guaranteed in Canada.
Democratic Rights The tradition of democratic
rights in Canada is specifically guaranteed by the Charter. This
means that Canadian citizens have a constitutional right to vote in
elections for members of Parliament and provincial legislatures,
and to seek election themselves. A few restrictions on a citizen's
right to vote or to run in an election have been found to be
reasonable in a democratic society; for example, restrictions on
minors or on certain election officials who may have to cast a
deciding ballot.
Another democratic protection is that our governments cannot
continue to hold power indefinitely without calling an election.
The Charter requires governments to call an election at least once
every five years. The only exception is in a time of national
emergency, such as war. But, even then, two thirds of the members
of Parliament or a legislature must agree to delay the
election.
The Charter also provides that Parliament and the provincial
legislatures must sit at least once a year. This ensures that our
governments perform the work for which they were elected, and also
that they will have to answer questions and explain themselves in
public; they cannot govern in secret.
Mobility Rights Canadian citizens have the
right to enter, remain in or leave the country. Citizens and
permanent residents have the constitutional right to live or seek
work anywhere in Canada. This includes the right to live in one
province and work in another. Further, the Charter prevents
provinces from distinguishing between residents and newcomers. For
example, if a person is a qualified professional in a province,
such as an accountant or a teacher, that province cannot prevent
him or her from working there because that person resides elsewhere
in the country. However, this does not prevent a province from
making residency a requirement for certain social and welfare
benefits, nor does it prevent the application of other laws or
practices of general application in force in the province that do
not discriminate. Also, a province in which the employment rate is
below the national average has the right to undertake programs for
socially and economically disadvantaged residents of the
province.
Legal Rights The Charter requires government to
act in accordance with specified rights and freedoms. These rights
are designed to protect the individual and to ensure fairness
during legal proceedings, particularly in criminal cases. The right
to habeas corpus to challenge a detention, and to be presumed
innocent until the contrary be proved, have always been recognized
as part of our law, but those rights are now guaranteed in our
constitution.
In Canada, everyone has a right to life, liberty and security of
the person, and cannot be deprived of these rights except in
accordance with fundamental justice. Canadians are protected
against unreasonable searches and seizures; even where a search or
seizure is authorized by law, the police cannot use excessive force
in carrying it out. We are also protected against being detained or
arrested arbitrarily. In other words, a police officer must have a
reasonable suspicion that we have committed a crime before
detaining us.
The Charter also protects us once we are arrested or detained.
We have a right to be told why we are being arrested or detained,
to consult a lawyer without delay and to be informed of this right,
and to have a court determine quickly whether the detention is
lawful. These rights are to protect against arbitrary actions by
law enforcement agencies.
When charged with an offence under federal or provincial law, we
also have the right to be told promptly of the offence; to be tried
within a reasonable time; not to be compelled to testify at one's
own trial; to be presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a
reasonable doubt in a fair and public hearing by an independent and
impartial tribunal; not to be denied reasonable bail without cause;
to be tried by a jury for serious charges; and not to be tried or
punished twice for the same offence.
Everyone also has the right not to be subjected to any cruel and
unusual punishment. Any witness at trial has the right to the
assistance of an interpreter if he or she does not understand the
language or is deaf. Witnesses also have the right not to have
incriminating evidence used against them in subsequent
proceedings.
Equality Rights
Under the Charter, every individual, regardless of race,
religion, national or ethnic origin, colour, sex or age, as well as
one who is physically or mentally disabled, is equal before and
under the law and enjoys equal protection and benefit of the law.
This means that laws and government programs, such as pension
plans, must not be discriminatory. For example, practices that
unfairly discriminate on the basis of religious observance are not
permitted. However, the existence of the Charter does not mean that
all people always have to be treated in exactly the same way. For
example, it is constitutional to create special programs to favour
individuals or groups who may be at a disadvantage in society, such
as women, visible minorities or the disabled.
Language Rights
The Charter recognizes English and French as Canada's official
languages, as well as the official languages of New Brunswick. Both
languages have equal status and equal rights and privileges as to
their use in the institutions of the Parliament and Government of
Canada, and the Legislature and Government of New Brunswick.
Everyone has the right to use English or French in the debates
and proceedings of Parliament or of New Brunswick's legislature,
and all statutes and parliamentary records and journals must be
printed and published in both languages. Everyone has the right to
use English or French in proceedings before any court established
by Parliament or in any court in New Brunswick. Moreover, members
of the public have a right to communicate with and receive
available services, in English or French, from the head or central
offices of federal institutions and from other federal offices
where there is a significant demand in either language, or where
the nature of the office makes it reasonable. The public has a
right to communicate with and receive available services, in
English and French, from all offices of New Brunswick legislative
and governmental institutions.
The Constitution Act, 1867 and the
Manitoba Act, 1870 give persons in Quebec and
Manitoba, respectively, the right to use English and French in
debates and proceedings of the legislatures and the courts of those
provinces, and require that provincial laws be enacted and
published in both languages. The Charter preserves these rights and
obligations.
Minority Language Educational Rights
In the nine predominantly English-speaking provinces and the
territories, citizens whose mother tongue is French, or who
attended French primary schools in Canada, or who have a child who
has received or is receiving primary or secondary school
instruction in French in Canada, have a constitutional right to
send all their children to French schools.
In Quebec, citizens who received their primary instruction in
English in Canada, or who have a child who was or is being
instructed in English in Canada, have the constitutional right to
send all their children to English schools.
The right to minority language instruction in English or French
applies wherever in the respective province there are sufficient
numbers of other children in the same situation to warrant the
provision of such instruction, and includes, where the number of
children warrant it, the right of those children to receive their
instruction in minority language schools and educational
facilities.
Aboriginal Rights
A number of provisions in the Charter, and other
provisions in the Constitution, specifically provide for the
protection of the rights of the aboriginal peoples of Canada who
are defined as including Indian, Inuit and Metis. The purpose of
these provisions is two-fold: first, to recognize and protect the
aboriginal and treaty rights of aboriginal peoples and, secondly,
to help aboriginal peoples preserve their cultures, identities,
customs, traditions and languages. For instance, no provision in
the Charter can be used to take away any rights that
aboriginal peoples now have or may acquire in the future from, for
example, the settlement of land claims.
The Charter and Other Rights
It would be wrong to think that the Charter embodies all our
rights as Canadians; rather, the Charter only guarantees a basic
minimum set of rights. We all have other rights that derive from
federal, provincial, international and common law. And, of course,
Parliament or a provincial legislature can always add to our
rights.
The Constitution affirms that we are a multicultural country and
that Charter rights must be interpreted consistently with this
ideal.
|